Evaluating the use of a lower blood pressure target to guide drug treatment in critically ill children with low blood pressure

ISRCTN ISRCTN20609635
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN20609635
IRAS number 289545
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 48813, IRAS 289545, HTA - NIHR128895
Submission date
21/05/2021
Registration date
24/05/2021
Last edited
15/05/2024
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
In critically ill children, hypotension (low blood pressure) is common, especially in patients with severe infections and is a key feature of shock. Untreated, hypotension compromises tissue perfusion (blood flow) and organ function, with an increased risk of multiple organ failure. Vasoactive agents (which also stimulate the heart) and fluids are mainstays of treatment. Central venous catheters (a tube inserted into a large vein) are often used to help with treatment. Around 80% of the 20,000 children admitted to UK PICUs each year receive fluid bolus therapy and around 30% receive vasoactive drugs at some point during their intensive care stay.
Though interventions to treat hypotension may be lifesaving, there are also harms. Excessive fluids are associated with prolonged Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay and increased illness and death. Most vasoactive drugs induce vasoconstriction (constriction of blood vessels), which may reduce blood flow and cause other effects. Central venous catheters are usually sited to give the patient vasoactive drugs; these catheters are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (blood clots) and infection, particularly in very small children.
Current guidelines recommend maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP – mean arterial or average blood pressure) for children with sepsis around the 50th centile for age. However, these guidelines are based on low-quality evidence and no guidance is given for an upper MAP limit.
In adults with sepsis, the 5th centile value for mean blood pressure has been recommended. This strategy has been examined in a number of recent studies, all of which investigated a permissive blood pressure target in critically ill adults with a variety of pathology. None of these studies demonstrated any significant difference in the overall death rate between the lower and higher blood pressure target groups. However, a pooled analysis found an increased incidence of supraventricular tachycardia (abnormally fast heart rhythm) in the higher blood pressure target group and an increased death rate in those patients in the higher blood pressure target group enrolled after over 6 h of vasopressors (medicines that constrict blood vessels).
The aim of this study is to find out whether the benefits associated with a lower blood pressure target will outweigh the risks associated with lower MAP values and the medical interventions needed to raise blood pressure, improving outcomes and decreasing costs.

Who can participate?
Children under 16 years old admitted to one of the PICUs on invasive mechanical ventilation, who have started treatment with a vasoactive drug for hypotension in the last 6 hours and are expected to continue for at least 6 hours.

What does the study involve?
Patients will be randomly allocated between the intervention and control groups. The intervention group are treated with a permissive blood pressure target (MAP target of 5th centile for age). The permissive blood pressure target is to be followed at any point the patient needs vasoactive drugs during this critical care unit admission. The decision to discontinue vasoactive agents will be determined by the patients' ability to maintain the MAP target without vasoactive drugs. All other care will be at the discretion of the treating clinical team. The control group receive usual care. No specific blood pressure target will be set for usual care, with treating clinicians directed to follow their standard practice.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
No promises will be made to participants. There are potential risks and benefits of being in both the intervention and control group but the overall effect is not known, which is why this study is needed. Very low blood pressure can be associated with organ damage or may even be life-threatening. However, interventions to treat hypotension may be lifesaving, there are also harms. Excessive fluids are now known to be associated with prolonged paediatric intensive care unit stay and increased death rate. Most vasoactive drugs commonly used in children cause vasoconstriction, which may reduce blood flow with secondary effects on organ function. Central venous lines are usually sited to administer vasoactive drugs; these are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and infection, particularly in very small children in whom the central venous catheter may occupy most of the vessel lumen (the inside space). The results of this study will benefit critically ill children treated in PICU.

Where is the study run from?
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
August 2020 to November 2026

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr David Inwald
di260@cam.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Dr David Inwald
Scientific

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit
Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-9518-7821
Phone +44 (0)7917 373689
Email di260@cam.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomized; Interventional; Design type: Treatment, Management of Care
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet https://www.icnarc.org/Our-Research/Studies/Current-Studies/Pressure
Scientific titlePRESSURE: PRotocolised Evaluation of permiSSive blood pressure targets versus Usual caRE. Evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of using a permissive blood pressure target to guide titration of vasoactive drugs in critically ill children with hypotension
Study acronymPRESSURE
Study hypothesisA permissive blood pressure target (mean arterial pressure (MAP) target of 5th centile for age) to guide treatment (as compared with usual care) is clinically and cost-effective in mechanically ventilated, critically ill children with hypotension, on vasoactive drugs.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 10/05/2021, East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (The Old Chapel, Royal Standard Place, Nottingham, NG1 6FS, UK; +44 (0)02071048065; cambridgesouth.rec@hra.nhs.uk), REC ref: 1/EE/0084
ConditionCritically ill children with hypotension
InterventionEligible patients will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to either permissive blood pressure targets or usual care using a central web-based randomisation service (sealed envelope). Randomisation will be stratified by site and age.

Intervention group:
Participants allocated to the intervention group will be treated using an allocated lower blood pressure target whilst receiving vasoactive drugs. The target allocated will depend on the participant's age. The decision to discontinue vasoactive drugs will depend on the patient's ability to maintain the target. All other usual care will be provided at the discretion of the treating clinical team, according to local practice.

Usual care:
Participants allocated to this group will receive usual care, according to local practice.

A follow-up questionnaire will be provided to those who have agreed to it 12 months post randomisation.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Vasoactives
Primary outcome measureClinical effectiveness:
Composite of mortality and duration of ventilator support, defined by the Paediatric Critical Care Minimum Dataset (PCCMDS), from randomisation to day 30

Cost-effectiveness:
Incremental net monetary benefit (INB), evaluated at the NICE recommended threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), at 90 days
Secondary outcome measures1. Mortality collected via sites on case report form (CRF) at PICU discharge, 30 days, 90 days and 12 months
2. Duration of survival collected via sites on CRF and NHS digital if necessary to 12 months
3. Time to liberation from invasive ventilation, collected via sites on CRF, from PICU admission to PICU discharge
4. Functional status measured by the Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scales between PICU admission and PICU discharge
5. Receipt of renal replacement therapy collected via sites on CRF and PICANet at 30 days
6. Length of PICU and hospital stay collected via sites on CRF from PICU admission to PICU discharge
7. Health-related quality of life (HrQoL), measured by the child self-or parent-proxy reported PedsQL-4.0 with age-appropriate versions covering the wide range included in the trial (1 month-16 years) and the Child Health Utility 9D Index (CHU-9D), at 1 year
8. Incremental costs measured using CRF data, PICANet and NHS Digital at 30 days
Overall study start date01/08/2020
Overall study end date30/11/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit37 Weeks
Upper age limit16 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 1900; UK Sample Size: 1900
Participant inclusion criteriaCurrent participant inclusion criteria as of 11/08/2023:
1. Age >37 weeks corrected gestational age and <16 years
2. Enrolled within 6 hours of first meeting all the following criteria:
2.1. Accepted for or admitted to a participating PICU
2.2. Face-to-face contact with PICU staff or transport team
2.3. On invasive mechanical ventilation
2.4. Receiving a continuous infusion of vasoactive drug for hypotension
2.5. Vasoactive drug expected to continue for at least 6 hours or more





Previous participant inclusion criteria:
1. Age >37 weeks corrected gestational age and <16 years
2. Accepted for or admitted to PICU
3. Receiving a continuous infusion of a vasoactive drug for hypotension commenced within the previous 6 hours
4. Vasoactive drug expected to continue for at least 6 hours or more
5. On invasive mechanical ventilation
Participant exclusion criteriaCurrent participant exclusion criteria as of 11/08/2023:
1. Admitted post cardiac surgery
2. Known cardiomyopathy
3. Neonates with suspected or proven duct dependent circulation
4. Acute brain injury
5. Currently being treated for pulmonary hypertension
6. Admitted with malignant hypertension
7. Death perceived as imminent
8. Previously recruited to PRESSURE





Previous participant exclusion criteria:
1. Admitted post cardiac surgery
2. Known cardiomyopathy
3. Neonates with suspected or proven duct dependent circulation
4. Brain injury
5. Pulmonary hypertension
6. Malignant hypertension
7. Death perceived as imminent
8. Previously recruited to PRESSURE
Recruitment start date01/11/2021
Recruitment end date30/11/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom
  • Wales

Study participating centres

St Mary's Hospital
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
The Bays
South Wharf Road
London
W2 1BL
United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Infirmary Square
Leicester
LE1 5WW
United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 9RS
United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Headley Way
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Bristol Royal Infirmary
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
Trust Headquarters
Marlborough Street
Bristol
BS1 3NU
United Kingdom
Gartnavel Royal Hospital
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
J B Russell House
1055 Great Western Road
Glasgow
G12 0XH
United Kingdom
St. James's University Hospital
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Alder Hey Hospital
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Eaton Road
West Derby
Liverpool
L12 2AP
United Kingdom
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Cobbett House
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge Biomedical Campus
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
The Royal London Hospital
Barts Health NHS Trust
80 Newark S
London
E1 2ES
United Kingdom
Royal Stoke University Hospital
University Hospitals of North Midlands Nhs Trust
Newcastle Road
Stoke-On-Trent
ST4 6QG
United Kingdom
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Western Bank
Sheffield
S10 2TH
United Kingdom
Queens Medical Centre
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Trust Headquarters
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Freeman Hospital
The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Freeman Road
High Heaton
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE7 7DN
United Kingdom
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
Great Ormond Street
London
WC1N 3JH
United Kingdom
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff & Vale University LHB
Woodland House
Maes-Y-Coed Road
Cardiff
CF14 4HH
United Kingdom
Southampton General Hospital
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Tremona Road
Southampton
SO16 6YD
United Kingdom
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Steelhouse Lane
Birmingham
B4 6NH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

Addenbrookes Hospital
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1223 217418
Email research@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
Website http://www.cuh.org.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04v54gj93

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Co-ordinating Centre (NETSCC); Grant Codes: NIHR128895

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/05/2027
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination plan1. The protocol will be uploaded to https://www.icnarc.org/Our-Research/Studies/Current-Studies
2. The Final Report will be submitted to the NIHR HTA Programme for publication in Health Technology Assessment
3. The findings from PRESSURE will also be published in appropriate peer-reviewed scientific journals and relevant professional journals
IPD sharing planAn anonymised dataset will be prepared for sharing by request from Dr David Inwald (di260@cam.ac.uk) and requests will be approved by the Trial Management Group (TMG).

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article 17/04/2024 15/05/2024 Yes No

Editorial Notes

15/05/2024: The following changes were made to the study record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 01/05/2024 to 30/11/2025.
2. The overall study end date was changed from 31/01/2025 to 30/11/2026.
3. The intention to publish date was changed from 31/01/2026 to 31/05/2027.
4. Publication reference added.
11/08/2023: The following changes have been made:
1. A drug/device/biological/vaccine name was added.
2. The study website was added.
3. The participant information sheet link was amended.
4. The inclusion criteria were updated.
5. The exclusion criteria were updated.
02/03/2022: The following changes have been made:
1. The recruitment start date has been changed from 02/08/2021 to 01/11/2021.
2. The recruitment end date has been changed from 02/02/2024 to 01/05/2024.
21/05/2021: Trial's existence confirmed by the NIHR.