A randomised study to compare the outcomes after realignment knee surgery versus non-surgical treatment with bespoke knee physiotherapy, for patients under 60 years of age with osteoarthritis of the knee

ISRCTN ISRCTN99042491
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN99042491
IRAS number 306571
Secondary identifying numbers NIHR129820, CPMS 55238, IRAS 306571
Submission date
17/01/2023
Registration date
25/01/2023
Last edited
17/04/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and most commonly affects the knee joint causing issues with mobility, quality of life, and ability to work. Treatment options include non-surgical management and surgery may also be considered. Knee replacement is successful in patients over 60 years but less so if under 60 as the implant wears out sooner, therefore alternative options are sought to delay knee replacement surgery as long as possible. High tibial osteotomy (HTO), is a surgical procedure where the bone is cut just below the knee joint and a small wedge is opened, to shift the person’s weight away from the damaged part of the knee to a healthy part of the knee. This can decrease pain, improve function and delay or avoid the need for knee replacement. Personalised knee therapy (PKT) is a physiotherapist-delivered non-surgical focussed intervention consisting of a programme of exercise alongside exercise enabling pain relief (external braces if required) which aims to improve muscle control in the lower limb and knee joint, to shift weight away from the ‘worn’ part of the knee, help reduce pain and avoid the need for further surgery. In this study, the team want to find out if HTO is better at delaying or avoiding knee replacement surgery than PKT alone in patients under 60 years old by comparing these two interventions.

Who can participate?
Patients aged >18 and <60 years with old with symptomatic medial compartment knee OA who the treating orthopaedic surgeon considers a suitable candidate for medial opening wedge HTO

What does the study involve?
Patients will be enrolled at around 20 NHS hospitals in the UK to determine the clinical (pain relief, improvement in function, quality of life, return to work) and cost-effectiveness of both treatments at 24 months. A mixed method process evaluation in a subset of staff and patients will explore trial eligibility; recruitment and retention; acceptability of intervention implementation including trial processes and collection of routine monitoring data; patient experience of taking part and the contextual factors that influence this.

For participants randomised to the surgical group:
1. They will be placed on a routine NHS waiting list to have the HTO surgery
2. They will have their surgery at their local hospital and follow the local process for having the surgery and recovering from the operation. After their operation, they will receive standard postoperative rehabilitation from their hospital

For participants randomised to the non-surgical group:
1. They will be referred to the local NHS Physiotherapy department at the hospital and receive the specialised PKT physiotherapy programme of rehabilitation for knee OA
2. PKT will be delivered at their local NHS physiotherapy department over six sessions within a period of 3-4 months

Participants in both arms of the study will get the same questionnaires at 12 and 24 months post-randomisation (either via post or email) to assess whether these treatments have worked.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Both treatment options (non-surgical and surgical) have been proven in previous studies to improve knee pain, reduce disability and delay or avoid the need for a knee replacement altogether.

Non-surgical treatment has the obvious advantage that it does not require an operation and all the risks that go with an operation. The non-surgical treatment takes around 3-4 months to deliver and requires participants to attend at least six sessions with the physiotherapist and commit to the tailored exercise programme over this time. Participants may also be offered bracing and steroid injections. The treatment is directed at improving symptoms from osteoarthritis and does not alter the alignment of the lower leg.

Where is the study run from?
The lead study site is The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh - NHS Lothian with the trial management team in Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit - University of Edinburgh.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
August 2022 to July 2027

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK)

Who is the main contact for the study?
Mr Anish Amin (Chief Investigator), Anish.K.Amin@ed.ac.uk (UK)

Study website

Contact information

Mr Anish Amin
Principal Investigator

Department of trauma and orthopaedic surgery
Room S4334 (c/o Medical Secretary)
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
51 Little France crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4SA
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-9768-7595
Phone +44 (0)131 242 6881
Email Anish.K.Amin@ed.ac.uk
Miss Rachel Penman
Public

University of Edinburgh
level 2, NINE Edinburgh BioQuarter
9 Little France Road
Edinburgh
EH16 4UX
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-0297-6851
Phone +44 (0)131 651 9970
Email r.penman@ed.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulti-centre prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) parallel-group controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Home, Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet 43069 MOTION_PIS_v3.0_10Jan2023.pdf
Scientific titleWhat is the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery with medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) compared with non-surgical treatment in the management of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients younger than 60 years?
Study acronymMOTION Trial
Study hypothesisDetermine whether the intervention is superior to the comparator by answering the following two research questions:
1. For patients aged <60 years old with medial compartment knee OA, what is the relative clinical effectiveness (pain relief, improvement in function, quality of life, return to work) of HTO compared with non-surgical management at 24 months?
2. For patients aged <60 years old with medial compartment knee OA, what is the relative cost-effectiveness of HTO compared to non-surgical management at 24 months and as modelled over a lifetime horizon?
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 16/01/2023, South Central - Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (2 The Square, Temple Quay, Bristol, BS1 6PN, United Kingdom; +44 (0)207 104 8088; hampshireb.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 22/SC/0446

ConditionMedial compartment knee osteoarthritis
InterventionIn this study, patients under 60 years old with knee OA who the treating orthopaedic surgeon considers a suitable candidate for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) surgery will be selected to compare the two possible options (non-surgical versus HTO). Half of the participants will be randomised for surgery (HTO) and half will be randomised to undertake a personalised knee therapy (PKT) package. PKT consists of a core package of a progressive structured exercise programme and advice on pain management, lifestyle and if appropriate, weight management. If it falls within usual care, optional inclusion of additional manual therapy, steroid injection, insoles or bracing and treatment of any co-existing symptoms can be introduced. The package is delivered over a 12 – 16 week period and involves 6 face-to-face sessions of physiotherapy and a patient program of physiotherapy to complete at home. Patients will be asked to complete a diary to record their compliance with the programme and bring it along to each visit for the details to be recorded. Which of the two treatments patients will get will be decided by chance, using a computer - half the patients will get one treatment, and half will get the other.

To compare the interventions, we will ask patients about their pain, knee function, quality of life and ability to work before and after the treatment. The research will be carried out at the local hospital or institution where the patient would normally be seen and treated.
Intervention typeMixed
Primary outcome measurePatients' opinions about their knee and associated problems measured using the patient-reported Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 24 months
Secondary outcome measures1. Fidelity of interventions measured using the minimum requirements/acceptable variation (MRAV) proforma completed between 6 -12 months post-intervention (note that this interval may be different from the same period post-randomisation due to NHS waiting lists)
2. Patients' opinions about their knee and associated problems measured using the patient-reported Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 12 months post-randomisation.
3. Symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life measured using five separate KOOS subscales at 12- and 24-months post-randomisation
4. Function and pain measured using the Oxford Knee score (OKS) at 12 and 24- months post-randomisation
5. Artificial prosthesis awareness during daily activities measured using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) at 12- and 24- months post-randomisation
6. Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L score (EQ-5D-5L – EQ-5D) at 12- and 24- months post-randomisation
7. Sleep quality measure using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 12- and 24-months post-randomisation
8. Employment status measured using a bespoke Return to Work/Employment Questionnaire developed at the lead centre at 12 and 24 months post-randomisation
9. Additional study-knee-related operative intervention measured using patient medical records at 12- and 24-months post-randomisation
10. Intraoperative and postoperative complications measured using patient medical records at 12 and 24 months post-randomisation
11. Health Economic Evaluation Outcomes derived from the EQ-5D score at 12- and 24- months post-randomisation
11.1. Health and social care resource utilisation and associated NHS and personal social services (PSS) cost and Quality Adjusted life years (QALY) at 24 months
11.2. Incremental Cost per QALY at 24 months
11.3. NHS and PSS cost, and QALYs as modelled over a lifetime horizon to account for future impacts on the need for TKR and associated revision surgery and their timing relative to retirement
11.4. Incremental Cost per QALY as modelled over a lifetime horizon to account for future impacts on the need for TKR and associated revision surgery and their timing relative to retirement
Overall study start date01/08/2022
Overall study end date31/07/2027

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit60 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants224
Total final enrolment91
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patient aged <60 years old with symptomatic medial compartment knee OA who the treating orthopaedic surgeon considers a suitable candidate for medial opening wedge HTO
Participant exclusion criteria1. Aged <18 or >60 years old
2. Body mass index (BMI) >40
3. Patients considered for HTO but who DO NOT have any knee OA including:
3.1. Offloading HTO for concomitant cartilage repair (No OA)
3.2. Offloading HTO solely to treat ligamentous instability (ACL/PCL)
3.3. Symptomatic avascular necrosis/osteonecrosis
3.4. Correction of intraarticular or extraarticular post-traumatic knee deformity
4. Patients requiring double-level knee osteotomy for correction of deformity
5. History of inflammatory arthropathy including rheumatoid arthritis, gout, psoriasis
6. Previous high tibial or distal femoral osteotomy in the same or contralateral knee
7. Previous knee replacement (partial or total) in the same or contralateral knee
8. Cognitive impairment or inability to consent.
9. Inability to comply with study procedures.
10. Previous history of septic arthritis in the knee
Recruitment start date01/02/2023
Recruitment end date01/04/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom
  • Wales

Study participating centres

NHS Lothian
Waverley Gate
2-4 Waterloo Place
Edinburgh
EH1 3EG
United Kingdom
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
J B Russell House
Gartnavel Royal Hospital
1055 Great Western Road Glasgow
Glasgow
G12 0XH
United Kingdom
NHS Fife
Hayfield House
Hayfield Road
Kirkcaldy
KY2 5AH
United Kingdom
NHS Grampian
Summerfield House
2 Eday Road
Aberdeen
AB15 6RE
United Kingdom
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Walsgrave General Hospital
Clifford Bridge Road
Coventry
CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley Way
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust
University Hospital Lewisham
Lewisham High Street
London
SE13 6LH
United Kingdom
Warrington and Halton Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Warrington Hospital
Lovely Lane
Warrington
WA5 1QG
United Kingdom
Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
St Homas' Hospital
Westminster Bridge
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom
East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Colchester Dist General Hospital
Turner Road
Colchester
CO4 5JL
United Kingdom
St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
St George's Hospital
Blackshaw Road
Tooting
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
Portsmouth Road
Frimley
Camberley
GU16 7UJ
United Kingdom
Whiston Hospital (site)
Whiston Hospital
Warrington Road
Prescot
L35 5DR
United Kingdom
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Mindelsohn Way
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2GW
United Kingdom
NHS Lanarkshire
14 Beckford Street
Hamilton
ML3 0TA
United Kingdom
Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Galsworthy Road
Kingston upon Thames
KT2 7QB
United Kingdom
Salisbury District Hospital
Salisbury District Hospital
Odstock Road
Salisbury
SP2 8BJ
United Kingdom
The Maidstone Hospital
Hermitage Lane
Maidstone
ME16 9QQ
United Kingdom
Sunderland Royal Hospital
Kayll Road
Sunderland
SR4 7TP
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Edinburgh
University/education

The Queens Medical Research Institute
47 Little France Crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4TJ
Scotland
United Kingdom

Phone None available
Email resgov@accord.scot
Website http://www.ed.ac.uk/home
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01nrxwf90
NHS Lothian
Hospital/treatment centre

The Queens Medical Research Institute
47 Little France Crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4TJ
Scotland
United Kingdom

Phone None available
Email accord@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
Website http://www.nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk/Pages/default.aspx
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03q82t418

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health and Care Research
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/07/2028
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal.
The press will also be engaged through the University of Edinburgh press office. We may also use lay summaries and infographics which can be sent to trial participants, and trial hospitals, and published on our trial website, or in conjunction with the main publication, if journal policies allow. We will prepare articles for dissemination within magazines such as Arthritis Today and patient-focused websites such as https://www.patient.co.uk and https://www.versusarthritis.org.
IPD sharing planThe data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet version 3.0 10/01/2023 25/01/2023 No Yes
Protocol file version 2.0 06/12/2022 25/01/2023 No No
HRA research summary 20/09/2023 No No

Additional files

43069 MOTION Protocol_v2.0_06Dec2022.pdf
43069 MOTION_PIS_v3.0_10Jan2023.pdf

Editorial Notes

17/04/2025:
11/04/2025: The recruitment end date was changed from 31/01/2025 to 01/04/2025. Royal Albert Edward Infirmary was removed from the study participating centres.
21/10/2024: The following changes were made:
1. Study website added.
2. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, North Bristol NHS Trust, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospital Southampton, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Cardiff & Vale University Lhb, and Stockport NHS Foundation Trust were removed from the Study participating centres.
3. Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, The Maidstone Hospital and Sunderland Royal Hospital were added to the the Study participating centres.
20/09/2023: A link to the HRA research summary was added.
18/01/2023: Trial's existence confirmed by NIHR (UK).