A decision aid for helping people to decide about colorectal cancer screening
ISRCTN | ISRCTN98108615 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN98108615 |
Secondary identifying numbers | PI12/00509 |
- Submission date
- 10/12/2018
- Registration date
- 27/12/2018
- Last edited
- 16/07/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Cancer
Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Regular colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for people older than 50 years old because they have a higher risk of developing this disease. However, a significant proportion of this population do not comply with this recommendation. The researchers have developed a web-based decision aid (DA) to help people to make an informed decision about undergoing CRC screening. It includes information about the disease, as well as two screening procedures: fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy (their characteristics, potential benefits and harms). The DA is available on the following link: http://www.pydesalud.com/toma-de-decisiones-en-cancer-colorrectal/. The aim of this study is to find out whether this DA can help people to make informed decisions about CRC screening.
Who can participate?
People between 50-69 years old who have no history of CRC or current symptoms, and who have never had been screened for CRC
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to either individually review the DA accompanied by a researcher, or to not review the DA. The main outcome assessed is decisional conflict, that is, participants' uncertainty about undergoing CRC screening or not. The study also assesses their knowledge about CRC and the screening procedures, their intention to be screened, and the importance that they attributed to different characteristics of the screening procedures.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Regarding potential benefits, those allocated to the intervention group have access to evidence-based information about colorectal cancer screening. There are no risks of potential physical or psychological harm for participating in the trial.
Where is the study run from?
1. Primary care center of Santa Ursula (Tenerife)
2. Primary care center of Ofra (Tenerife)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2016 to March 2017
Who is funding the study?
Carlos III Health Institute (Spain)
Who is the main contact?
Amado Rivero-Santana
Contact information
Scientific
Camino Candelaria, 44, El Chorrillo
El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife
38109
Spain
ORCID ID | 0000-0002-5067-3196 |
---|
Study information
Study design | Interventional randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | GP practice |
Study type | Other |
Scientific title | Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial |
Study hypothesis | Reviewing a decision aid about colorectal cancer screening will improve participants' decisional conflict about undergoing the procedure. |
Ethics approval(s) | Scientific and Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria (Tenerife, Spain), January 2016, file number: 2013/21 |
Condition | Colorectal cancer |
Intervention | The study took place in two primary care centers: one located in an area where a public screening program was available, and other in which that program was not available at the moment of the study. Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention (web-based decision aid) or usual care. Computerized randomization was carried out centrally by an independent researcher. Allocation was not blinded for patients and researchers. The decision aid (DA) included information about colorectal cancer and two screening procedures: fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy (their characteristics, potential benefits and harms). It is available on the following link: https://www.pydesalud.com/toma-de-decisiones-en-cancer-colorrectal/ Each intervention participant reviewed the DA accompanied by a researcher in her/his primary care center. Outcome measures were assessed by questionnaires immediately after reviewing the DA. Participants in the control group did not review the DA and just completed the questionnaires assessing the outcome measures. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Decisional conflict, measured with the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) immediately after reviewing the DA in the intervention group, and at the baseline assessment in the control group |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Knowledge of the disease and the screening procedures, assessed using 12 items questionnaire 2. Intention to undergo screening (yes/no) 3. Concordance between participants' values about the characteristics of the screening procedures (importance attributed in a 1-5 Likert scale) and their intention to be screened All assessments were performed immediately after reviewing the DA in the intervention group (except for knowledge, which was also measured before the aplication of the DA), and at the baseline assessment in the control group |
Overall study start date | 01/01/2016 |
Overall study end date | 31/03/2017 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Mixed |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 126 |
Total final enrolment | 107 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Age 50-69 2. Having no CRC history or current symptoms 3. Having no family antecedents of CRC 4. Not been screened previously |
Participant exclusion criteria | Cognitive impairment that hinders understanding of the study aims, information provided in the DA, or filling out the questionnaires |
Recruitment start date | 01/03/2016 |
Recruitment end date | 31/12/2016 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Spain
Study participating centres
Spain
Spain
Sponsor information
Government
C/ Sinesio Delgado, 4 (entrada por Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5)
Madrid
28029
Spain
Website | http://www.isciii.es/ISCIII/es/general/index.shtml |
---|---|
"ROR" | https://ror.org/00ca2c886 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- SaludISCIII, InstitutodeSaludCarlosIII, Instituto de Salud Carlos III | Madrid, Spain, Carlos III Institute of Health, Institute of Health Carlos III, Carlos III Health Institute, ISCIII
- Location
- Spain
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 28/02/2019 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
Publication and dissemination plan | An article reporting the study results is currently under review in the journal BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez (lilisbeth.peresteloperez@sescs.es). The trialists will share all of the individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices). Other documents available: study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form, analytic code. The data will be available immediately following publication (no end date). The data will be available for researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to Dr Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez (lilisbeth.peresteloperez@sescs.es). To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 10/01/2019 | 14/01/2019 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
16/07/2019: Total final enrolment added.
14/01/2019: Publication reference added.