Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Levonorgestrel containing Intrauterine system in Primary care against Standard treatment for menorrhagia

ISRCTN ISRCTN86566246
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86566246
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 02/06/02
Submission date
10/06/2004
Registration date
11/06/2004
Last edited
06/11/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Prof Janesh Gupta
Scientific

Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Metchley Park Road
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TG
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 607 4751
Email j.k.gupta@bham.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomized controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Patient information can be found at: http://www.eclipse.bham.ac.uk/documents/Eclipse_PIS_v1.1_dated_21.07.08.pdf
Scientific titleEffectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Levonorgestrel containing Intrauterine system in Primary care against Standard treatment for menorrhagia: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymECLIPSE
Study hypothesisMenorrhagia is a very common problem affecting women's lives. Attendant demand on time and resources in primary and secondary care is considerable. However it is unclear which treatment options are the most effective and the most acceptable to women, particularly in the long term, and experience of care varies widely. Currently 1 in 5 women in the UK have a hysterectomy, half of whom present with heavy periods. This trial will assess the effectiveness, cost effectiveness and acceptability of using the levonorgestrel IUS (Mirena coil) compared to standard medical treatment for women with menorrhagia presenting in primary care.
Ethics approval(s)South West Research Ethics Committee, 18/08/2004, ref: 04/MRE06/7. The latest approval for amendments was given on 25/07/2008.
ConditionMenorrhagia
InterventionLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems compared with standard medical treatment, based on the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Levonorgestrel
Primary outcome measureAdded as of 30/01/2009:
The Shaw Menorrhagia Questionnaire

All primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years with a possibility of 10 years.
Secondary outcome measuresAdded as of 30/01/2009:
1. SF-36® Health Survey
2. Sexual Activity Questionnaire
3. Euroqol EQ-5D

All primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years with a possibility of 10 years.
Overall study start date01/11/2004
Overall study end date31/12/2014

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit25 Years
Upper age limit50 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participants570
Total final enrolment571
Participant inclusion criteriaWomen between the ages of 25-50 presenting to General Practitioners with menorrhagia, who are not intending to become pregnant in the next 5 years
Participant exclusion criteria1. Taking HRT
2. Patients with any contraindications to an IUS, with or without Levonorgestrel
3. Patients with contraindications to medical therapy
4. Women with abdominally palpable enlarged fibroid uteri (10-12 Weeks size)
5. Women to whom the contraceptive effect of LNG-IUS would be unacceptable.
6. Women with symptoms suggestive of other pathology (irregular bleeding, intermenstrual bleeding, postcoital bleeding)
7. Women with risk factors for endometrial cancer (tamoxifen treatment, unopposed ostrogen treatments)
Recruitment start date01/11/2004
Recruitment end date31/12/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
B15 2TG
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Birmingham (UK)
University/education

Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.bham.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03angcq70

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 10/01/2013 Yes No
Results article results 01/10/2015 Yes No
Results article 14/11/2022 15/11/2022 Yes No
Other publications 10-year observational follow-up study 01/10/2023 06/11/2023 Yes No

Editorial Notes

06/11/2023: Publication reference added.
15/11/2022: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
17/01/2008: the overall trial start and end dates were updated from 01/01/2004 and 31/08/2012 to 01/11/2004 and 30/06/2013, respectively.
30/01/2009: extensive amendments were made to this record, including the following:
1. Scientific title was added
2. Target number of participants was amended from 1,000 to 570
Other amendments are recorded within the relevant fields.
04/09/2009: the overall trial end date was updated from 30/06/2013 to 31/12/2014.