Adjunctive Clindamycin For Cellulitis clinical trial (C4C)

ISRCTN ISRCTN86329346
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86329346
EudraCT/CTIS number 2013-001218-14
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01876628
Secondary identifying numbers 15297
Submission date
25/10/2013
Registration date
25/10/2013
Last edited
15/05/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Cellulitis is an infection of the skin most often caused by a bacterium called Group A streptococcus. Cellulitis is very common and some people can get it more than once. It can make people feel very ill and cause a lot of skin damage, which can take many weeks to get better. The bacterium produces a variety of poisons or 'toxins' which damage the skin in a similar way to a burn. The normal treatment is with an antibiotic called flucloxacillin, which is effective. Another antibiotic called clindamycin is often used to treat a more serious infection, caused by the same bacterium, called necrotising fasciitis. This antibiotic is also sometimes added to, or used after, flucloxacillin if the cellulitis does not appear to be getting better. Clindamycin is added because some doctors think that it will reduce the amount of toxins released by the bacterium. If less toxin is released then there should be less damage. There is some evidence that adding clindamycin helps the patient. We think that if we add clindamycin to the normal flucloxacillin treatment of cellulitis it might reduce the amount of skin damage. If the amount of skin damage is less then the patient will feel less pain and should recover more quickly. This study should tell us whether adding clindamycin is effective and well tolerated.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 or over who have a diagnosis of cellulitis of a single, upper or lower, limb.

What does the study involve?
Patients will be randomly allocated to receive flucloxacillin either with or without clindamycin. We will then see which patients get better more quickly. We will give the patient flucloxacillin as soon as the diagnosis of cellulitis is made, so treatment is not delayed. Clindamycin can sometimes cause diarrhoea so we do not want to give it unless it really does make patients get better quickly.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants will receive appropriate treatment and follow up. There are no extra risks compared with the usual treatments.

Where is the study run from?
Bristol Royal Infirmary and 17 other hospitals in the UK

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2013 to March 2016

Who is funding the study?
NIHR - Research for Patient Benefit (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Lucy Dixon
Bristol.cellulitis@uhbristol.nhs.uk

Study website

Contact information

Dr Richard Brindle
Scientific

Bristol Royal Infirmary
Marlborough Street
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom

Email richard.brindle@uhbristol.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised interventional treatment trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet http://www.bristolcellulitis.org/media/2269570/c4c_patient_information_sheet_v1.4_140904.pdf
Scientific titleAdjunctive Clindamycin for Cellulitis: Clinical trial comparing flucloxacillin with or without clindamycin for the treatment of limb cellulitis (C4C Trial)
Study acronymC4C
Study hypothesisThe aim of this study is to see whether the addition of Clindamycin, a protein inhibiting antibiotic, to the standard antibiotic treatment of limb cellulitis, with Flucloxacillin, results in less tissue damage and a more rapid resolution of both systemic and local features, in a cost-effective manner.
Ethics approval(s)13/SC/0211; First MREC approval date 11/06/2013
ConditionTopic: Injuries and Emergencies, Skin; Subtopic: Injuries and Emergencies (all Subtopics), Skin (all Subtopics); Disease: Injuries and Emergencies, Dermatology
InterventionOral clindamycin or placebo added to IV or PO flucloxacillin for 48 hours.
Study Entry : Single Randomisation only
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase IV
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Clindamycin
Primary outcome measureImprovement of systemic and local features; Timepoint(s): Day 1 and Day 5
Secondary outcome measures1. Decrease in pain using a visual analogue score (VAS); Timepoint(s): Day 1, Day 5 and Day 10
2. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) based on the EQ-5D-5L; Timepoint(s): Day 1 and Day 30
3. Recovery of renal function; Timepoint(s): Day 1, Day 5 and Day 10
4. Resolution of composite inflammatory markers; Timepoint(s): Day 1, Day 5 and Day 10
5. Resolution of systemic features; Timepoint(s): Day 1, Day 5 and Day 10
6. Return to work or normal activities; Timepoint(s): Day 1 and Day 30
Overall study start date15/10/2013
Overall study end date31/03/2016

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsUK Sample Size: 450
Participant inclusion criteria1. Male or female subjects aged 18 or over who have a diagnosis of cellulitis of a single, upper or lower, limb
2. Who are able to understand the study and give consent
3. Who are able to take oral medication
Participant exclusion criteria1. Patients with a confirmed history of penicillin, flucloxacillin or clindamycin allergy
2. Patients known to be colonised with MRSA or MRSA isolated from wound within the last year
3. Unable to take oral medication
4. Previous history of Clostridium difficile colitis
5. Clindamycin taken within the last 30 days
6. Clinically unstable
7. Unable to understand the study or give consent
8. Any doubt over the certainty of the diagnosis of cellulitis
9. Patients taking any drug that is incompatible with either flucloxacillin or clindamycin
Recruitment start date15/10/2013
Recruitment end date30/09/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom
The Royal London
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom
Royal Devon & Exeter
Exeter
EX2 5DW
United Kingdom
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull
HU3 2JZ
United Kingdom
Yeovil District Hospital
Yeovil
BA21 4AT
United Kingdom
Doncaster & Bassetlaw Hospital
Doncaster
DN2 5LT
United Kingdom
Basingstoke Hospital
Basingstoke
RG24 9NA
United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London
SE5 9RS
United Kingdom
Poole Hospital
Poole
BH15 2JB
United Kingdom
Royal Lancaster Infirmary
Lancaster
LA1 4RP
United Kingdom
St George's Hospital
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
Manchester Hospital
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Royal United Hospital Bath
Bath
BA1 3NG
United Kingdom
Newham Hospital
London
E13 8SL
United Kingdom
Portsmouth Hospital - Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth
PO6 3LY
United Kingdom
Northumbria Hospital - North Tyneside General Hospital
North Shields
NE29 8NH
United Kingdom
Basildon Hospital
Basildon
SS16 5NL
United Kingdom
Leeds General Hospital
Leeds
LS1 3EX
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research & Development
Upper Maudlin Street
Bristol
BS2 8AE
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.uhbristol.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04nm1cv11

Funders

Funder type

Government

Research for Patient Benefit Programme; Grant Codes: PB-PG-0212-27015
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme, RfPB
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/02/2016
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryOther
Publication and dissemination plan1. Molecular studies as soon as possible
2. Results February 2016 BMJ
3. Health economics not known
4. Procalcitonin and inflammatory markers not known
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 17/03/2017 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

15/05/2018: Publication reference added.
29/04/2015: The overall trial end date was changed from 30/03/2015 to 31/03/2016.