Evaluation of unloading the heart in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with mechanical circulatory support devices

ISRCTN ISRCTN82431978
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN82431978
IRAS number 300145
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 51137, IRAS 300145
Submission date
17/01/2022
Registration date
19/01/2022
Last edited
05/06/2024
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Cardiogenic shock occurs when the heart suddenly fails and is unable to meet the body's demands, often leading to death. Cardiogenic shock is becoming more common particularly in patients suffering heart attacks and therefore research into potential treatments to improve the high death rate is urgently needed. Current treatment options are limited and can be associated with an increased death rate.
A promising new treatment is veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). This mechanical support system works like a heart bypass to support the body whilst the heart recovers. However, while beneficial to most other organs, VA-ECMO can put additional pressure on the heart by pumping blood backwards into the aorta (the main artery that carries blood away from the heart), preventing it from recovering. If the heart is unable to overcome this increased pressure (or afterload) a number of dangerous events can occur such as the formation of blood clots in the heart or the build-up of fluid in the lungs which can be potentially fatal. This problem can be solved by using additional devices in the circulation to “unload” the heart. Two devices are commonly used for this task - the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella - but it is not known which one works better as they have never been directly compared. Additionally, each device has a distinct mechanism of action, the effect of which has never been studied in patients treated with VA-ECMO. Currently therefore hospitals are treating such patients differently due to the lack of available evidence as to the best treatment strategy. This study aims to directly compare the effects of the IABP and Impella on parameters of supply and demand of oxygen to the heart which are the key determinants of heart recovery.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 years and over who are being treated in an intensive care unit for cardiogenic shock and are either treated with VA-ECMO or are being considered for treatment with VA-ECMO by their doctors are eligible to participate.

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to be treated with either an IABP or Impella. They will have specialised measurements of blood flow in their coronary (heart) arteries and pressures within the ventricle (the main pumping chamber of the heart) taken in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. These will be repeated after the unloading device is inserted. The remainder of the participants care will be as they would normally receive if not participating in the research study.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Because it is not known which device works better, there are no direct benefits from taking part in this study. The researchers will obtain information which it is hoped will improve the treatment of patients with the same condition in the future.
Participating in the study will not increase risk substantially compared to standard treatment with VA-ECMO. Taking the additional measurements will involve placing a small sensor in the coronary arteries and the heart itself under X-ray guidance: the risk of causing damage to either the heart or the arteries is likely to be around 1 in 300. A small additional dose of ionising radiation will be required to acquire the study measurements. Ionising radiation may cause cancer many years or decades after the exposure. We are all at risk of developing cancer during our lifetime. 50% of the population is likely to develop one of the many forms of cancer at some stage during our lifetime. Taking part in this study will add only a very small chance of this happening (<0.1% added risk).

Where is the study run from?
King’s College London (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
February 2020 to November 2026

Who is funding the study?
1. British Heart Foundation (UK)
2. RBH-KHP Partnership Transformation Funding (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Saad Ezad
saad.ezad@kcl.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Saad Ezad
Scientific

Cardiovascular Division
Rayne Institute
St Thomas’ Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-3008-5290
Phone +44 (0)207 188 3026
Email saad.ezad@kcl.ac.uk
Prof Divaka Perera
Principal Investigator

Cardiovascular Division
Rayne Institute
St Thomas’ Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-6362-1291
Phone +44 (0)207 188 3026
Email divaka.perera@kcl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomized; Interventional; Design type: Treatment, Device
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleHEmodynamic effects of Reducing left ventricular Afterload with impella or intra-aortic balloon CounterpuLsation during veno-arterial Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic Shock (HERACLES)
Study acronymHERACLES
Study hypothesisIt is hypothesised that ventricular unloading of patients supported with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with an Impella will result in a greater increase in the coronary device flow reserve as compared to unloading with an intra-aortic balloon pump.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 13/01/2022, London - Queen Square Research Ethics Committee (HRA NRES Centre Bristol, 3rd Floor, Block B, Whitefriars Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK; +44 (0)2071048225; queensquare.rec@hra.nhs.uk), REC ref: 21/LO/0853
ConditionCardiogenic shock
InterventionHERACLES is a randomised control trial designed to compare the physiological effects on myocardial oxygen supply and demand of ventricular unloading with either an IABP or Impella in patients supported with VA-ECMO. Patients who are either supported with VA-ECMO or being considered for VA-ECMO support will be eligible for inclusion in the trial. At the time of cardiac catheterisation participants will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to unloading with either an IABP or Impella. Randomisation will be performed via a computer using a web-based bespoke KCTU randomisation system. Coronary flow and ventricular pressure volume measurements will be recorded prior to insertion of the randomised unloading device and then repeated following device insertion. The randomised unloading device will remain in situ for as long as clinically indicated at the discretion of the treating physician. No further study related procedures are performed after completion of the study protocol in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Patients will be followed up 6 months post randomisation. Results will be compared between the two groups to identify if one device has a greater beneficial impact on the ratio of myocardial oxygen supply and demand.
Intervention typeDevice
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)IABP, Impella
Primary outcome measureCoronary device flow reserve measured using a coronary guidewire post left ventricular (LV) unloading
Secondary outcome measures1. Early effect of LV unloading measured using an LV catheter post LV unloading
2. Minimal microvascular resistance calculated from pressure and flow measurements post LV unloading
3. Time to VA-ECMO decannulation (days) measured using patients' medical records
4. Days alive and off ICU (at 30 days post randomisation) measured using patients' medical records
Overall study start date03/02/2020
Overall study end date28/11/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 36; UK Sample Size: 36
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patients aged ≥18 years with cardiogenic shock of any aetiology
2. On veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support or starting VA-ECMO post PCI
3. Undergoing clinically indicated cardiac catheterisation
Participant exclusion criteria1. Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
2. Confirmed left ventricular thrombus on imaging
3. Age <18 years
4. Pregnancy or peripartum cardiomyopathy
5. Contraindication to either intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) insertion i.e. ≥moderate aortic regurgitation (AR), severe peripheral vascular disease (PVD) prohibiting insertion of either device
6. Mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR)
Recruitment start date09/03/2022
Recruitment end date28/05/2026

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

St Thomas' Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 9RS
United Kingdom
Harefield Hospital
Hill End Road
Harefield
Uxbridge
UB9 6JH
United Kingdom
Royal Brompton Hospital
Sydney Street
London
SW3 6NP
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

King's College London
University/education

c/o Prof. Reza Razavi
Room 5.31, James Clerk Maxwell Building
London
SE1 3QD
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)2078483224
Email reza.razavi@kcl.ac.uk
Website http://www.kcl.ac.uk/index.aspx
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0220mzb33

Funders

Funder type

Charity

British Heart Foundation; Grant Codes: FS/CRTF/21/24118
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
the_bhf, The British Heart Foundation, BHF
Location
United Kingdom
RBH-KHP Partnership Transformation Funding

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date22/12/2026
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal. No additional study files are available
IPD sharing planThe data-sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

05/06/2024: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 21/02/2025 to 28/05/2026.
2. The overall end date was changed from 22/08/2025 to 28/11/2026.
3. The intention to publish date was changed from 22/08/2026 to 22/12/2026.
4. The plain English summary was updated to reflect these changes.
21/02/2022: The recruitment start date has been changed from 21/02/2022 to 09/03/2022.
17/01/2022: Trial's existence confirmed by the NIHR.