Two vs. one high-frequency rTMS session per day for treatment-resistant depression
ISRCTN | ISRCTN71929667 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN71929667 |
Secondary identifying numbers | 0527821514 1st Psychiatric Dept, Eginition University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece |
- Submission date
- 01/08/2014
- Registration date
- 18/08/2014
- Last edited
- 09/10/2017
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) is a form of brain stimulation therapy that is often used, for example, to treat depression when other treatments have not worked (that is, treatment resistant depression). It involves using magnetic pulses to stimulate a part of the brain that controls mood. This causes an electric current to be passed to specific nerve (brain) cells. The therapy is believed to work by resetting brain wave frequencies to normal and therefore relieving the symptoms of depression. In this study, we are investigating how successful two sessions of HF-rTMS is in treating patients with treatment resistant depression compared to only one HF-rTMS session or either one or two sham (dummy) sessions. The results should help us to develop faster and more successful treatment for patients with treatment resistant depression.
Who can participate?
Adults aged 18-59 years, who are right handed, have treatment resistant depression and have not had HF-rTMS therapy before.
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated into one or 4 groups. Those in group 1 receive three weeks of treatment of two HF-rTMS sessions per day, group 2 recieve one HF-rTMS session per day, group 3 receive two sham sessions a day and group 4 receive one sham session per day. Each participant has a follow up session 2 weeks after the treatment.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants that receive HF-rTMS sessions might find that their depression symptoms are alleviated, particularly those in the two session a day group. Patients who have HF-rTMS therapy usually experience some slight pain or discomfort at the site of stimulation. Seizures can occur if specific safety guidelines are not followed, but this is very rare.
Where is the study run from?
First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (Greece).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2006 to December 2011
Who is funding the study?
The First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (Greece).
Who is the main contact?
Christos Theleritis
chtheler@med.uoa.gr or ctheleritis@gmail.com
Contact information
Scientific
72-74 Vas. Sofias Avenue
Athens
11528
Greece
Phone | +30 (0) 2107289324 |
---|---|
psakkas@med.uoa.gr |
Study information
Study design | 5-year parallel-group, randomized, sham-controlled one-site trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Other |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet. |
Scientific title | Two vs. one high-frequency rTMS session per day for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized sham-controlled trial. |
Study hypothesis | High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) has proven antidepressant effects, but the optimal frequency of sessions remains unclear. It is hypothesised that twice per day HF-rTMS sessions will be more effective than once per day session in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference between once and twice per day sessions of HF-rTMS. |
Ethics approval(s) | First Department of Psychiatry Ethics Committee, Eginition University Hospital,02/05/2006, ref. 0527821514. |
Condition | Depression |
Intervention | We conducted a 3-week, sham- controlled trial to assess the antidepressant efficacy of one session/day compared to two active rTMS sessions/ day (A2 group) and equivalent sham sessions once/day and twice/ day in 98 patients with treatment-resistant major depression (TRD), with a subsequent 2-week follow-up period. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Difference from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score and Clinician Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score at the end of treatment and follow-up. |
Secondary outcome measures | None |
Overall study start date | 01/07/2006 |
Overall study end date | 01/12/2011 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Upper age limit | 59 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 98 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for current non-psychotic major depressive disorder 2. Have treatment resistant depression (with failure of at least two trials of two different antidepressants) 3. 18-59 years of age 4. Right handed 5. Be naïve to TMS |
Participant exclusion criteria | 1. History of seizures 2. History of head injury with loss of consciousness 3. History of brain surgery 4. History of presence of metallic implants 5. History of dementia or other Axis I diagnosis 6. History of substance dependence or abuse within the previous 6 months 7. Pregnancy |
Recruitment start date | 01/07/2006 |
Recruitment end date | 01/12/2011 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Greece
Study participating centre
11528
Greece
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
72-74 Vas. Sofias Avenue
Athens
11528
Greece
Phone | +30 (0) 2107289324 |
---|---|
egslelabath@hol.gr | |
Website | http://www.eginitio.gr/ |
https://ror.org/04gnjpq42 |
Funders
Funder type
Hospital/treatment centre
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/09/2017 | Yes | No |