SUMS: Standing up in people with multiple sclerosis

ISRCTN ISRCTN69614598
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN69614598
IRAS number 163803
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 18999, IRAS 163803
Submission date
03/02/2016
Registration date
03/02/2016
Last edited
17/08/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common diseases of the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord). Healthy nerves are coated in a fatty casing (myelin sheath) which helps messages to travel quickly and smoothly along nerves. When a person is suffering from MS, the immune system, which normally helps to protect against infection, attacks the myelin sheath, stripping it from the nerves (demyelination). This demyelination means that messages cannot travel along the nerves effectively causing a range of disabilities, such as walking problems and immobility. Being able to stand upright is highly valued by most people, both mentally and physically. Standing frames are commonly used by people with spinal cord injury (SCI) who are unable to stand unaided. These frames provide support to enable even severely disabled patients to stand safely. Regular use has been shown to reduce complications of immobility (such as pressure sores and muscle wasting) and boost feelings of wellbeing. Many people with MS develop severe walking problems and so spend much of their day sitting down. The associated complications impact on quality of life and result in increased healthcare needs. These problems can be minimised if physical activity is increased, however without easy access to a frame, people must travel to a rehabilitation/MS centre to stand which can be both expensive and time consuming. Using a standing frame at home may offer a solution which reduces the economic and social costs for the patient and NHS. The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of a home-based standing programme with a frame in people who are severely disabled by their MS.

Who can participate?
Adults with MS who require assistance to walk more than 20 metres or who are restricted to a bed or wheelchair.

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Participants in the first group receive two, home-based, hour-long therapy sessions, during which time they are taught how to use the standing frame, followed by six 15-minute telephone consultations. The participants are encouraged to stand in the frame for 30 minutes, three times a week. In order to offer further support, participants are given user-friendly information leaflets and DVDs. Participants in the second group continue to receive usual care. At the start of the study and then again after 20 and 36 weeks, participants in both groups complete a number of questionnaires and assessments in order to test if their motor (movement) abilities and quality of life have improved.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from an increased level of physical activity and improvements to movement and mood as a result of regularly standing in the frame. Risks of taking part are small but some participants may experience some increased fatigue, muscle stiffness or soreness because muscles that may not have been moved in a long time are being used.

Where is the study run from?
Peninsula Allied Health Centre (Plymouth University) and at least 30 other health centres catering for people with MS across Devon, Cornwall and East Anglia (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2015 to March 2017

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Jennifer Freeman
jenny.freeman@plymouth.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Dr Jennifer Freeman
Public

Peninsula Allied Health Centre
Plymouth University
Derriford Road
Plymouth
PL6 8BH
United Kingdom

Phone +44 1752 588835
Email jenny.freeman@plymouth.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a home-based self-management standing frame programme plus usual care versus usual care in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) who have severely impaired balance and mobility
Study acronymSUMS
Study hypothesisThe aim of this study is to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of a home-based self management standing programme in people who are severely physically impaired with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Ethics approval(s)NRES Committee South West – Frenchay, 13/05/2015, ref: 15/SW/0088
ConditionTopic: Neurological disorders; Subtopic: Neurological (all Subtopics); Disease: Multiple Sclerosis
InterventionParticipants are randomly allocated to one of two groups.

Intervention group: Participants will be asked to stand in an Oswestry standing frame for 30
minutes three times per week for a total of 16 weeks during a 20 week period. This method of supported standing, uses a robust wooden frame to provide support through the use of straps at the knees, hips and ankles (www.oswestry-frames.co.uk). The treating physiotherapist will teach the participant and carer safe use of the standing frame over 2 face-to-face sessions in the participant’s home (~60 minutes/session). They will be taught exercises, stretches and balance activities to undertake using the frame. To complement this and optimise adherence, an information booklet and DVD will provide advice on how to intensify the programme, a detailed description/schema of the exercises, advice on safety issues, and “frequently asked questions”.
To further optimise adherence these face-to-face sessions will be supported by weekly telephone support (~15 minutes) for 4 weeks, and then monthly for the following 2 months. Calls will focus on facilitating individuals to set and achieve personal targets. As is routine clinical practice, the therapist’s contact name and telephone number will be provided should any queries arise.
Individuals may take up to four weeks to become re-accustomed to an upright position. A 20 week period has therefore been allocated for achieving the desired intensity of standing activity as participants will not have been used to prolonged standing and may fatigue. This further allows for time when the participant is unable to use the frame (illness, holidays, etc.), as highlighted by our user discussion groups.

Control group: Participants receive usual physiotherapy care only. Although usual care varies between individuals, it rarely involves regular physiotherapy intervention either within the community or hospital. Intervention is generally limited to a few visits, typically reacting to presenting problems (e.g. practising transfer skills, providing mobility aids) rather than promoting long-term preventative self-management..

Participants in both groups are followed up at 20 and 36 weeks.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureMotor function is measured using the Amended Motor Club Assessment at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks.
Secondary outcome measures1. Bowel and Bladder Control is measured using the self report Bladder and Bowel Control Scales at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
2. Falls frequency is determined at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
3. Knee extensor strength is measured using dynanometry at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
4. Length of hip flexors are measured using goniometry at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
5. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) are measured at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
6. Quality of Life is measured using the 29-item MS Impact Scale and the EURoQOL 5D-5L at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
7. Respiratory capacity is measured using spirometry to measure forced expiratory volume (FEV) at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
8. Sitting balance is measured using the Modified Functional Reach in Sitting at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
9. Spasm Frequency is measured using the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale at baseline, 20 and 36 weeks
Overall study start date01/01/2015
Overall study end date31/03/2018

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 140; UK Sample Size: 140; Description: 70 people will be randomly allocated to the usual care group and 70 to the standing frame plus usual care group.
Total final enrolment140
Participant inclusion criteria1. Individuals diagnosed with primary or secondary progressive MS according to McDonald’s criteria
2. Aged 18 years or over
3.Willing and able to consent to participate
4. Scoring 6.5-8.0 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), i.e. people who “require bilateral assistance to walk 20 metres or less” to those “restricted to bed or wheelchair”
5. Ability of the home / family to accommodate the standing frame
6. Able to get into a standing frame independently or with assistance from a carer
7. Agreement of another person (e.g. carer) should assistance be necessary for the standing programme
8. Willing and able to travel to local assessment centres for blinded outcomes assessment
Participant exclusion criteria1. Any recent changes in disease modifying therapies (more specifically if they have ever had Campath, are within past 6 months of ceasing Nataluzimab, or are within 3 months of ceasing any other MS disease modifying drug)
2. Have relapsed/received steroid treatment within the last month
3. Are currently, or during the past 6 months have undertaken a regular standing frame programme(more than once a week)
4. Have a history of osteoporotic-related fractures
5. Have comorbidities which contraindicate standing in the frame (e.g. foot ulceration, uncontrolled epilepsy) or likely to impact on the trial (e.g. chronic jaundice, heart disease, age related multiple co-morbidities)
6. Currently participating in another clinical trial (rehabilitation or pharmacological)
Recruitment start date01/09/2015
Recruitment end date31/03/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Peninsula Allied Health Centre
Plymouth University
Derriford Road
Plymouth
PL6 8BH
United Kingdom
Peninsula Community Health
Unit 2 Harleigh Road
Bodmin Business Centre
Bodmin
PL31 1AQ
United Kingdom
Newquay Hospital
St Thomas Road
Newquay
TR7 1RQ
United Kingdom
Royal Cornwall Hospital
2 Penventinnie Lane
Treliske
Truro
TR1 3LJ
United Kingdom
Camborne Redruth Community Hospital
Barncoose Terrace
Redruth
TR15 3ER
United Kingdom
Liskeard Community Hospital
Clemo Road
Liskeard
PL14 3XD
United Kingdom
Newton Abbot Hospital
West Golds Road
Newton Abbot
TQ12 2TS
United Kingdom
Paignton Hospital
Church Street
Paignton
TQ3 3AG
United Kingdom
Totnes Hospital
Torbay and Southern Devon Health and Care NHS Trust
Coronation Road
Totnes
TQ9 5GH
United Kingdom
Dartmouth Hospital
South Embankment
Mansion House Street
Dartmouth
TQ6 9BD
United Kingdom
Mount Gould Local Care Centre
Therapy Unit
200 Mount Gould Road
Plymouth
PL4 7PY
United Kingdom
Ivybridge Reablement Team
5 Olafs Chapel
Puslinch Farm
Yealmpton
PL8 2NN
United Kingdom
Bideford Hospital
Abbotsham Road
Bideford
EX39 3AG
United Kingdom
Tyrrell Hospital
Ilfracombe Community Rehabilitation
St Brannock's Park Road
Ilfracombe
EX34 8JF
United Kingdom
Axminster Hospital
Axe Valley Community Rehabilitation team
Chard Road
Axminster
EX13 5DU
United Kingdom
Tiverton and District Hospital
Kennedy Way
Tiverton
EX16 6NT
United Kingdom
Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Centre
West Grange
Clyst Heath
Exeter
EX2 7EY
United Kingdom
Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital
Wonford Road
Exeter
EX2 6DW
United Kingdom
Lucerne Residential Home
40-42 Chudleigh Road
Exeter
EX2 8TU
United Kingdom
Tavistock Community Rehabilitation Team
DCC Offices
Abbey Rise
Whitchurch Road
Tavistock
PL19 9AS
United Kingdom
Swaffham Community Hospital
Sporle Road
Swaffham
PE37 7HL
United Kingdom
Dereham Community Hospital
Northgate
Dereham
NR19 2EX
United Kingdom
Wymondham Health Centre
18, Bridewell Street
Wymondham
NR18 0AR
United Kingdom
Kelling Community Hospital
Old Cromer Road
High Kelling
Holt
NR25 6QA
United Kingdom
North Walsham Community Hospital
Yarmouth Road
North Walsham
NR28 9AP
United Kingdom
MS Therapy Centre
Iceni Way
Norwich
NR6 6BB
United Kingdom
Norwich Community Hospital
Bowthorpe Road
Norwich
NR2 3TU
United Kingdom
Disability Resource Centre
4, Bunting Road
Bury St Edmunds
IP32 7BT
United Kingdom
Newmarket Community Hospital
56 Exning Road
Newmarket
CB8 7JG
United Kingdom
The Kirkley Centre
154 London Road
Lowestoft
NR33 0AZ
United Kingdom
Bluebird Lodge
100, Mansbrook Boulevard
Stowmarket
IP3 9GJ
United Kingdom
Felixstowe Community Hospital
Constable Road
Felixstowe
IP11 7HJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

Neurology
The John Bull Building
Derriford Hospital
16 Research Way Derriford
Plymouth
PL6 8BU
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05x3jck08

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health Research
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/05/2018
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination plan1. Planned dissemination of results via journal articles, newsletters, conference presentations, user discussion groups, and the study website.
2. Planned publication in MS lay newsletters and magazines (e.g. MS Trust “Open Door” and MS Society “Research Matters” newsletters)
3. Planned presentation at national and international conferences
IPD sharing plan-

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/08/2019 16/07/2019 Yes No
Results article qualitative results 28/10/2020 30/10/2020 Yes No
Protocol article 05/05/2016 17/08/2022 Yes No
Statistical Analysis Plan version 1 17/01/2018 17/08/2022 No No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN69614598_SAP_V1_17Jan18.pdf

Editorial Notes

17/08/2022: Publication reference and statistical analysis plan added.
30/10/2020: Publication reference added.
16/07/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
05/02/2016: Verified study information with principal investigator.