Side by side comparison of 0.03% tacrolimus ointment (Protopic) versus usual topical steroid treatment in children with atopic dermatitis

ISRCTN ISRCTN65507338
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN65507338
Secondary identifying numbers N0129118582
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
21/04/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Peter Arkwright
Scientific

Child Health
Booth Hall Children's Hospital
Charlestown Road
Blackley
Manchester
M9 7AA
United Kingdom

Phone +44 0161 220 5535
Email peter.arkwright@manchester.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific title
Study hypothesisIn children with moderately severe atopic dermatitis is Protopic more effective than the usual steroid ointment in controlling disease activity?
There is only limited information concerning the relative efficacy of topical tacrolimus versus topical corticosteroids in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of tacrolimus ointment in the treatment of children with moderately severe atopic dermatitis currently receiving topical corticosteroids.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
ConditionSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases: Atopic dermatitis
InterventionRandomised controlled trial with random allocation to: [A] Protopic and [B] usual steroid ointment. Fifty children attending the regional eczema referral outpatient clinic at Booth Hall Children's Hospital will be randomised to apply Protopic ointment to one arm or leg and the effectiveness of this treatment will be compared with continuing application of the usual steroid to the other limb. The doctor, who will be blinded to which side the Protopic is applied, will assess the patient 1 week later to determine which treatment is more effective.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Protopic
Primary outcome measureComparison of the severity of eczema on the side to which the Protopic is applied compared with the other limb.
Secondary outcome measuresAtopic dermatitis
Overall study start date01/11/2002
Overall study end date01/11/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants50
Participant inclusion criteria50 children
Participant exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Recruitment start date01/11/2002
Recruitment end date01/11/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Child Health
Manchester
M9 7AA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Department of Health (UK)
Government

Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results 01/03/2007 Yes No