Feasibility study of MiADE, a system for analysing text in electronic health records at the point of care
ISRCTN | ISRCTN58300671 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN58300671 |
IRAS number | 322887 |
Secondary identifying numbers | CPMS 57302, IRAS 322887 |
- Submission date
- 10/10/2023
- Registration date
- 13/10/2023
- Last edited
- 17/03/2025
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Other
Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
This study aims to evaluate a computer program called MiADE which is designed to make it easier for clinicians to enter information in electronic health records in a structured, coded form. The study will assess the performance and utility of the system, and inform future improvements and developments.
Who can participate?
Clinicians at UCLH and inpatients managed under the care of a participating team during the study period
What does the study involve?
The study is a before-and-after comparison of the recording of structured information in electronic health records with and without the MiADE system. Clinicians participating in the study will be trained in the use of the new system and asked to fill in questionnaire surveys. The researchers will compare the average number of structured entries recorded per patient before and after switching on the MiADE system. They will observe a sample of outpatient consultations and interview a sample of patients to find out how the system affects their experience of the consultation. They will also interview a sample of clinicians working in the inpatient and outpatient settings.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants will be able to improve the usability of electronic health record systems, and thereby improve the quality of data within the systems. This will support safer patient care and better research. The risks for study participants are minimal.
Where is the study run from?
University College Hospital London (UCLH) (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2020 to March 2025
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Anoop Shah, a.shah@ucl.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
UCL Institute of Health Informatics
222 Euston Road
London
NW1 2DA
United Kingdom
0000-0002-8907-5724 | |
Phone | +44 (0)78 7676 7478 |
a.shah@ucl.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Non-randomized; Both; Design type: Process of Care, Other, Qualitative |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Non randomised study |
Study setting(s) | Other |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | 44382_PIS_V2_24Jul23.pdf |
Scientific title | Non-randomised feasibility study of point of care natural language processing using the MiADE system to assist structured clinical documentation |
Study hypothesis | The study hypothesis is that the MiADE point of care natural language processing system increases the number of diagnoses, medication and allergies recorded by clinicians in a structured way in the electronic health record. |
Ethics approval(s) | Approved 02/08/2023, South Central - Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee (Health Research Authority, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK; +44 (0)207 104 8120, +44 (0)207 104 8210, +44 (0)207 104 8290; hampshirea.rec.hra.nhs.uk), ref: 23/SC/0221 |
Condition | Health services research |
Intervention | This study consists of two substudies (inpatient and outpatient studies), each of which are non-randomised intervention studies with before and after comparison. The outpatient study also includes an embedded qualitative substudy for a subset of consultations, with patient and clinician interviews. Three time periods will be analysed. The primary comparison will be between pre-MiADE and post-MiADE once clinicians have been consented into the study, as they will have received training and the comparison will show the change in behaviour that results from the system being available. There is a possibility that structured recording may improve after clinicians enter the study because of the Hawthorne effect, so a prior 8-week period will also be studied in order to evaluate this effect. The MiADE system will be made available according to clinician-level permissions, which can be switched on or off. This will allow clinicians’ use of problem lists and other structured data to be compared before and after the system is switched on. There will be a period of at least 4 weeks between clinicians entering the study and having the MiADE system switched on. Study 1 (Outpatient study): Consultants and specialty doctors who see outpatients will be recruited via institutional communications and networks. Interested clinicians will be consented and receive training on the use of the system, as described below. They will be asked to fill in a survey on their level of experience and comfort with EHR systems. They will have the MiADE system switched on within their EHR user profile so that they have access to it from a particular date. Electronic health records of outpatients in the clinics linked to the clinician will be assessed between the training session and MiADE switch-on, and for 8 weeks after MiADE is switched on. The crude number of entries per patient in the problem list, medication record and allergy record will be calculated for outpatients seen by the clinician during this interval. Embedded qualitative substudy: For each clinician in the qualitative substudy, a sample of at least 2 outpatient consultations will be observed before the MiADE system is switched on for the clinician, and 2 outpatient consultations will be observed after the MiADE system is switched on. For each observed consultation, consent will be sought from the patient prior to the consultation. The researcher will sit in the consultation and observe the overall consultation, as well as timing the overall consultation and how long the clinician spends interacting with the EHR. A semi-structured interview will be held with the patient after the consultation either in person (if clinic space is available) or by telephone. After MiADE has been switched on and clinicians have been using it for at least a month, they will undergo a semi-structured interview with the researcher. Study 2 (Inpatient study): Inpatient clinical teams will be recruited to the study. Within each team, the clinicians (consultants, specialty and foundation doctors who see inpatients) will be recruited, consented and trained. Doctors rotate through clinical teams every few months, so the MiADE system will be switched on for the relevant clinicians at a time point halfway through the four-month rotation, to allow comparison of the completeness of structured recording of diagnoses on the problem list before and after the switch on. The ‘gold standard’ of recording diagnoses will be the ICD-10 coded billing diagnoses which are assigned by the clinical coding team based on a review of the entire medical record after a patient is discharged. Diagnoses will be aggregated by groups of ICD-10 codes, and a diagnosis will be considered as included in the problem list if any SNOMED CT concept which maps to an ICD-10 code in the group was recorded on or prior to the patient’s discharge date. This flexibility of mapping will be permitted as different professionals may assign different clinical codes to the same condition based on their interpretation and judgement, especially for cases where an exact code does not exist. The proportion of ICD-10 code groups with a problem list entry will be calculated per patient and aggregated across the patients under the care of the clinical team during the study period. All inpatient clinicians will be asked to complete surveys before and after having the MiADE system switched on. For a sample of 5 clinicians, semi-structured interviews will be held with the clinicians after they have been using MiADE for at least two weeks, using the same questions as for outpatient doctors except for the question on medications, as MiADE for inpatients does not handle medications. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Study 1 (outpatient): Number of structured entries for diagnoses, medication and allergies recorded by the clinician in outpatient consultations; Timepoint(s): Comparison before and after switching on the MiADE system Study 2 (inpatient): The proportion of ICD-10 coded billing diagnoses for which a similar SNOMED CT concept is present in the problem list for inpatients, evaluated at the point of discharge; Timepoint(s): Comparison before and after switching on the MiADE system |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. The proportion of structured data items suggested by MiADE that are accepted by the clinician for entry into the structured record during the period that the MiADE system is active 2. The distribution of computing time required per consultation note during the period that the MiADE system is active 3. Clinician and patient perceptions of structured data recording in electronic health records and the MiADE system: quantitative measures from categorical survey responses and qualitative measures from interviews and free-text survey responses, at least 2 weeks after the MiADE system has been switched on |
Overall study start date | 01/12/2020 |
Overall study end date | 31/03/2025 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient, Health professional |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | Planned Sample Size: 100; UK Sample Size: 100 |
Total final enrolment | 121 |
Participant inclusion criteria | Study 1 clinician inclusion criteria: Any interested clinicians who have their own clinic list at UCLH and see outpatients, who consent to be part of the study. A subset of at least five clinicians will be purposively sampled to include a range of specialties for the observation substudy, and they will undergo observed consultations. Study 1 patient inclusion criteria: All outpatients seen by the clinician from 2 months before being consented until 2 months after the MiADE system is switched on for included clinicians. For clinicians selected for observation (at least 5), the researchers will observe at least two consultations from one or more clinics before and two consultations from one or more clinics after the MiADE system is switched on will be observed. Hence the minimum number of observed consultations will be 20. Study 2 clinician inclusion criteria: All clinicians within interested inpatient teams at UCLH. Study 2 patient inclusion criteria: All inpatients managed under the care of a participating team during the study period. |
Participant exclusion criteria | There are no patient exclusions. If patients are unable to give written consent, the study will be discussed with a consultee who will be asked to give advice as to whether the patient would wish to be included in the study. A decision on whether or not to include the patient in the study will be based on a best interests assessment. |
Recruitment start date | 23/10/2023 |
Recruitment end date | 01/01/2025 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centres
London
NW1 2PQ
United Kingdom
London
NW1 2BU
United Kingdom
London
NW1 0PE
United Kingdom
London
W1T 7HA
United Kingdom
London
WC1N 3BG
United Kingdom
London
WC1N 3HR
United Kingdom
London
W1G 8PH
United Kingdom
London
WC1E 6AS
United Kingdom
London
WC1E 6AG
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)203 447 5696 |
---|---|
uclh.randd@nhs.net | |
Website | http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ |
https://ror.org/02jx3x895 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 31/12/2024 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not expected to be made available |
Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available because they consist of individual patient data, which cannot be shared because of patient confidentiality. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other files | Clinician information sheet version 2 |
24/07/2023 | 12/10/2023 | No | No |
Participant information sheet | version 2 | 24/07/2023 | 12/10/2023 | No | Yes |
Protocol file | version 1.1 | 12/10/2023 | No | No | |
Protocol file | version 2.0 | 21/06/2024 | No | No |
Additional files
Editorial Notes
17/03/2025: Total final enrolment was added.
21/06/2024: The following changes were made to the study record:
1. Protocol uploaded.
2. The recruitment end date was changed from 31/03/2024 to 01/01/2025.
3. The overall study end date was changed from 31/05/2024 to 31/03/2025.
09/01/2024: The recruitment end date was changed from 31/01/2024 to 31/03/2024.
10/10/2023: Study's existence confirmed by the NIHR.