Naprapathy or evidence-based care provided by a physician for patients with non-specific low back and/or neck/shoulder pain: a randomised controlled trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN56954776
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN56954776
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
12/09/2006
Registration date
30/10/2006
Last edited
18/05/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Lars Alfredsson
Scientific

Karolinska Instituet
Institute of Environmental Medicine
Box 210
Stockholm
SE-171 77
Sweden

Email lars.alfredsson@ki.se

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleNaprapathy or evidence-based care provided by a physician for patients with non-specific low back and/or neck/shoulder pain: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymThe BJÖRN-study
Study hypothesisThe hypothesis tested was: naprapathic treatment is more effective for patients with non-specific pain and disability in low back and/or neck/shoulder, than evidence-based advices provided by a physician.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics committee approval was received on the 29th of December 2003 from the Karolinska Institutet (dnr: 03-657)
ConditionNeck, shoulder or low back pain
InterventionNaprapathy (index group): One out of eight naprapaths gave a maximum of six treatments within six weeks in his/her own clinic. The naprapath decided how the treatment sequences should be performed and precise notes about the treatment, advises, progress and possible adverse reactions, were kept. Each appointment lasted for about 45 minutes. Naprapathy, founded by Dr Oakley Smith in the beginning of the 20th century, is a manual therapy for soft tissues and joints aimed at decreasing pain and re-establishing musculoskeletal function. Treatment with Naprapathy means that every patient is given an individual combination of manual naprapathic techniques as manipulation and mobilisation of joints as well as stretching and massage for the muscles. In addition to the manual treatments, preventive and rehabilitating physical activity and ergonomic advices often are given.

Evidence Based Care provided by a physician (control group): One out of four physicians gave evidence based care in direct conjunction with the physical examination all participating patients got prior to the randomisation (an additional 15 minutes). The evidence-based care (“gold standard”) involved evidence-based advice and support by the physician according to guidelines that aimed to empower the patient in the understanding of the fact that the best prognosis for recovery is received by living as normal a life as possible, including work and physical activities. The aim of the consultation was empowerment of the patient’s belief in and faith in his/her own capacity to handle and cope with the pain. A booklet and exercises conformed to the patients conditions were given. Precise notes were kept and a second consultation (approximately 15 minutes) after three weeks was scheduled. The patient was told that additional consultation could be offered if necessary.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measurePain and disability, measured by the Chronic Pain Questionnaire (CPQ)
Secondary outcome measuresHealth status, , measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) at 26 and 52 weeks, incorporating
1. Recovery
2. Quality of life
3. General health
4. Sick leave
5. Economical aspects in short and long term
Overall study start date07/03/2005
Overall study end date30/09/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participants400
Total final enrolment409
Participant inclusion criteriaParticipants were assembled mainly among employees at two big companies in Stockholm, Sweden (in total around 40,000 persons) during the period March to September 2005.

The inclusion criteria was a present non-specific pain in back or neck/shoulder of the kind that brought about marked disability at work and/or in leisure time, for at least two weeks.
Participant exclusion criteria1. Pregnancy
2. Specific diagnose as acute slipped disc or spinal stenos
3. Recently have been exposed to naprapathic treatment or evidence based physician consultation (the preceding two months) or other manual therapy with the exception of massage (the preceding month)
4. Surgery in the painful area
5. Red flags (e.g. serious disease in back or neck and recent trauma in the area)
6. Not able to understand Swedish
Recruitment start date07/03/2005
Recruitment end date30/09/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Sweden

Study participating centre

Karolinska Instituet
Stockholm
SE-171 77
Sweden

Sponsor information

Karolinska Institutet (Sweden)
University/education

Nobels väg 5
Solna
Stockholm
SE-171 77
Sweden

Phone +46 8 524 800 00
Email info@ki.se
Website http://www.ki.se
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/056d84691

Funders

Funder type

Government

Swedish Research Council (Sweden) (ref: K2005-27VK-15355-01A)
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Swedish Research Council, VR
Location
Sweden
Stockholm County Council (Sweden) (ref: 20050585)
Government organisation / Local government
Alternative name(s)
Stockholm County Council
Location
Sweden
Uppsala County Council (Sweden)

No information available

Capio (Sweden) (ref: 626)

No information available

Swedish Naprapathic Association (Sweden)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/06/2007 Yes No
Results article results 05/02/2010 Yes No
Results article 08/10/2021 11/10/2021 Yes No
Results article 16/05/2022 18/05/2022 Yes No

Editorial Notes

18/05/2022: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
11/10/2021: Publication reference added.