A randomised, controlled trial of a community-based perinatal intervention for postnatal depression in India

ISRCTN ISRCTN56588156
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN56588156
Secondary identifying numbers 060174
Submission date
06/11/2002
Registration date
06/11/2002
Last edited
17/02/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims.
Research has identified that significant numbers of women in South Asia can experience postnatal (postpartum) depression. Various effective interventions have been described for women with postnatal depression in high income countries, but at the time of starting this study, no effective intervention had been described for postnatal depression in South Asian women. We aimed to develop a low-cost intervention, based on the evidence-based treatment of 'listening visits' offered by Health Visitors in the UK. We adapted the listening visit intervention to allow it to be provided by experienced mothers who did not have any clinical qualification. We aimed to test the effectiveness of lay psychological intervention. We recruited pregnant women at high risk for postnatal depression, and our hypothesis was that women receiving the intervention would be less likely to develop postnatal depression than women receiving usual care.

Who can participate?
The study was based in Goa, India. We identified a community sample of women in the final months of pregnancy, and we used known risk factors for postnatal depression in Goa to identify women at high risk of developing postnatal depression. Only high-risk women were recruited into the study.

What does the study involve?
The active intervention was a package of 5-6 listening visits, delivered by a lay health worker. Participants in the control group received usual care from local health services.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
All participants in the study were screened for symptoms of depression. Any women with worrying levels of depression during the study were referred to an independent local psychiatrist for a free consultation to discuss treatment options. The same applied to women who were identified as having suicidal thoughts. There are no known side effects of the psychological intervention.

Where is the study run from?
The study was based in a community district of Goa, India. The local research base was the Sangath Centre, a non-governmental organisation providing clinical services to the local population, as well as being the centre for several community health and mental health research projects. The associated UK academic base of the researchers is the Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study ran from 2002 to 2003. We ran a pilot study from 2001 to 2002.

Who is funding the study?
The Wellcome Trust (UK).

Who is the main contact?
Dr Marcus Hughes, research fellow (2001-2004)
mhbina@virginmedia.com

Contact information

Prof Martin Prince
Scientific

Head of Section of Epidemiology
PO Box 60
Institute of Psychiatry
De Crespigny Park
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleA randomised, controlled trial of a community-based perinatal intervention for postnatal depression in India
Study acronymSMIPS (Supporting Mothers in Pregnancy Study)
Study hypothesisThe primary objective is to determine whether a brief perinatal intervention can reduce the prevalence of postnatal depression at three months postpartum, in a group of women identified as being at high risk for the condition, compared to a control group of high risk women. Risk status will be determined using data from an earlier cohort study.

The secondary objectives are:
1. To determine whether the growth and developmental outcome for the infants of women receiving the intervention is improved compared to the infants of women in the control group
2. To determine whether the prevalence of chronic depression, at six months postpartum, is reduced by the same intervention
3. To determine whether levels of maternal disability and health care usage are influenced by the intervention
4. To examine the effect of putative socio-demographic risk factors on response to the intervention
5. To identify the relationship between outcome (both maternal and infant) and adherence to the intervention
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
ConditionPostnatal depression; child development
InterventionA home-based, perinatal psycho-social intervention is given to a random half of the participants. It is based on 'listening visits' used for postnatal depression by UK health visitors, culturally adapted and piloted in Goa. One specific aspect of the intervention is a component to challenge male-child preference, and the psychological pressure that exists for some women to bear a male heir. This pressure has been shown in a recently published cohort study from Goa to be an important risk factor for postnatal depression. The intervention is delivered over five or six sessions (two antenatal, three to four postnatal).

The control group receives usual care from local medical and obstetric services.

The trial was conducted in collaboration with Sangath (http://www.Sangath.com), a non-governmental organisation, conducting research and providing mental health services to children and families in Goa, India.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Depression at three and six months postnatal (using Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale)
2. Primary infant outcome: mental development score on the Developmental Assessment Schedules for Indian Infants (DASII), measured at six months postnatal
Secondary outcome measures1. Maternal depression according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria (Revised Clinical Interview Schedule [CIS-R]), measured at three and six months postnatal
2. Disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, version II [WHO-DAS II]), measured at three and six months postnatal
3. Costs of healthcare (Modified Client Services Receipt Inventory [CSRI]), measured at three and six months postnatal
4. Infant growth, measured at three and six months postnatal
5. Maternal-infant interaction (Global Rating Scale of maternal-infant interaction [GRS]), measured at three months postnatal
Overall study start date01/08/2002
Overall study end date30/06/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants422
Participant inclusion criteria1. Pregnant women, between 26 and 34 weeks gestation at recruitment
2. At high risk of postnatal depression. A pre-recruitment screening interview is used to identify high risk women, based on:
2.1. Presence of psychological symptoms
2.2. Reporting the current pregnancy to be unplanned, and
2.3. Being vulnerable to excessive pressure to bear a male child (see interventions)
Participant exclusion criteria1. Women who did not speak the study language (Konkani)
2. Women who planned to move away from the project area during the period of the study
3. Women with a health problem of such seriousness that it would prevent them from participating in the study
Recruitment start date01/08/2002
Recruitment end date01/09/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • India
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Institute of Psychiatry
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

King's College London (UK)
University/education

Institute of Psychiatry
De Crespigny Park
London
SE5 8AF
England
United Kingdom

Email G.Dale@iop.kcl.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0220mzb33

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Wellcome Trust
Private sector organisation / International organizations
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 03/04/2004 Yes No