Amniocentesis Results: Investigation of Anxiety
ISRCTN | ISRCTN54376052 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN54376052 |
Secondary identifying numbers | HTA 99/48/04 |
- Submission date
- 17/10/2002
- Registration date
- 17/10/2002
- Last edited
- 08/08/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English Summary
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Prof Jenny Hewison
Scientific
Scientific
Academic Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences
University of Leeds
15 Hyde Terrace
Leeds
LS2 9LT
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)113 343 1894 |
---|---|
j.hewison@leeds.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | 2 X 2 factorial design randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Not specified |
Study type | Not Specified |
Scientific title | Amniocentesis Results: Investigation of Anxiety |
Study acronym | ARIA |
Study hypothesis | There is evidence both that being able to predict stressful events, and having information which normalises the content and timing of worries about such events, reduces anxiety. This provides scope for interventions designed to minimise anxiety while waiting for test results. Phase one: 1. To identify patterns of anxiety and the factors that contribute to this. 2. To develop an appropriate intervention for phase two, the RCT. 3. To obtain information about the patterns of anxiety which will inform the outcome measures and the timing of measurement in the RCT. Phase two - to test the following hypotheses: 1.That giving amniocentesis results out on a fixed date with an undertaking not to phone earlier even if possible, alters maternal anxiety during the waiting period, compared with a policy of phoning as soon as possible. 2. Providing parents with a "debriefing" leaflet describing the normal pattern of worry during the waiting period, reduces anxiety. Please note that, as of 15 January 2008, the start and end dates of this trial have been updated from 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2003 to 1 September 2001 and 31 March 2005, respectively. |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Condition | Pregnancy |
Intervention | Phase one: an observational cohort study (n=30) using anxiety diaries and qualitative interviews. Phase two: a 2 X 2 factorial design randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised immediately after amniocentesis to "phone result when available" or "issue result on a fixed date" and to "leaflet" or "no leaflet". The trial will use independent telephone randomisation, stratified by centre and maternal age (<35, >=35years). Setting: seven amniocentesis clinics = Leeds General Infirmary and St James's, Airedale, Harrogate, York, Hull Maternity Hospital and Castle Hill. The aim is to investigate how two interventions, firstly, the issue of a standard culture result on a fixed date (18 days after amniocentesis) or variable date, secondly, how the implementation of a new cytogenetic technique, Fluorescent In-situ Hybridisation (FISH), affect maternal anxiety levels. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | We will measure anxiety daily using the short Spielberger state measure with regular phone reminders The primary outcomes will be total anxiety in the first 24 hours after the test, over the last 24 hours before the result is issued, and the peak level of anxiety reached. Within 24 hours of issuing the results, parents will be asked to recall and score their anxiety over the waiting period. This will provide validation of the prospectively collected scores. We will not conduct any economic analysis because the costs of different modes of issuing results will be similar and the leaflets will be cheap. We will recommend that the method, which minimises anxiety, be used. |
Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
Overall study start date | 01/09/2001 |
Overall study end date | 31/03/2005 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Female |
Target number of participants | 226 |
Total final enrolment | 226 |
Participant inclusion criteria | Pregnant women who are having an amniocentesis for indications such as maternal age, triple test risk or the presence of a soft marker for Downs Syndrome |
Participant exclusion criteria | Women with a major structural abnormality on scan. Women who miscarry before the karyotype result is obtained (<1%) or whose result indicates aneuploidy (1 in 70) will be excluded from the primary analysis. |
Recruitment start date | 01/09/2001 |
Recruitment end date | 31/03/2005 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Academic Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences
Leeds
LS2 9LT
United Kingdom
LS2 9LT
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Department of Health (UK)
Government
Government
Quarry House
Quarry Hill
Leeds
LS2 7UE
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1132 545 843 |
---|---|
Sheila.Greener@doh.gsi.gov.uk | |
Website | http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/index.htm |
https://ror.org/03sbpja79 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/12/2006 | Yes | No | |
Results article | results | 01/04/2007 | 08/08/2019 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
08/08/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.