Randomised controlled trial comparing foam sclerotherapy, alone or in combination with endovenous laser therapy, with conventional surgery as a treatment for varicose veins

ISRCTN ISRCTN51995477
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN51995477
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 06/45/02
Submission date
25/02/2008
Registration date
29/02/2008
Last edited
05/09/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Up to 15% of men and 25% of women at some point in their life develop swollen and enlarged veins called varicose veins. This results in about 95,000 operations being performed each year in the NHS in England alone. There is considerable variation across the UK in accessing treatment for varicose veins, and also to the type of treatment offered. The most common treatment offered is surgery, which involves stripping out the veins under general anaesthetic. Recently, new treatments have been developed for treating varicose veins. These are called minimally invasive techniques as they can be given under local anaesthetic and so avoid the scars and bruising associated with surgery. They may also allow a quicker return to normal daily activities and work, more rapid treatment for a greater number of people, and result in fewer complications. They also allow expensive operating theatre time to be freed up. The two most common types of minimally invasive treatment are foam sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation. Foam sclerotherapy involves injecting special foam into your veins that scars the veins and seals them closed. Endovenous laser treatment involves having a tiny laser inserted into your vein which delivers energy that heats up the vein and seals it closed. Both techniques have been classified as safe to use in the NHS, although we have been advised to carefully monitor any side effects that might occur following foam sclerotherpy. Despite good short-term results, success in the long term is unclear. This study will assess this and determine the need for a second course of treatment.

Who can participate?
Patients aged over 18 with varicose veins

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to be treated with either surgery, foam sclerotherapy or both endovenous laser ablation and foam sclerotherapy. Participants are followed-up for six months initially (and then for up to 5 years) and are asked about their varicose veins, their general health and any visits to their GP or hospital about their varicose veins.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2008 to May 2011

Who is funding the study?
Health Technology Assessment Programme (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Julie Brittenden
j.brittenden@abdn.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Dr Julie Brittenden
Scientific

c/o Vascular Department
Ward 36
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Foresterhill
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom

Email j.brittenden@abdn.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Patient information can be found at: https://w3.abdn.ac.uk/hsru/class/site/Public_New/DownloadPage.aspx
Scientific titleRandomised controlled trial comparing foam sclerotherapy, alone or in combination with endovenous laser therapy, with conventional surgery as a treatment for varicose veins
Study hypothesisFoam sclerotherapy is more cost-effective in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year compared to surgery or laser therapy.

More details can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/064502
Protocol can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/51448/PRO-06-45-02.pdf
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration -– submission pending as of 25/02/2008
ConditionVaricose veins
InterventionArm 1: Foam sclerotherapy
Arm 2: Foam sclerotherapy + endovenous laser therapy
Arm 3: Conventional surgery
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureThe following will be assessed at 6 months:
Primary patient outcome:
1. Disease specific: Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire
2. Generic: EuroQol (EQ-5D), the 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36)

Primary economic outcome:
3. Incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY)
Secondary outcome measures1. Costs to the health service and patients and any subsequent care
2. Technical success of venous intervention at 6 weeks and 6 months
3. Clinical success of venous intervention at 6 weeks and 6 months
4. Disease-specific and generic quality of life at 6 weeks
5. Behavioural recovery
Overall study start date01/06/2008
Overall study end date31/05/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants1,015
Total final enrolment798
Participant inclusion criteria1. Adult patients (aged over 18 years old)
2. Those who are referred to the surgical out-patient department for treatment of primary varicose veins with symptomatic (CEAP [Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathological elements] classification grade 2 or above) primary long or short saphenous main stem incompetence (reflux >1 second on duplex scanning)
3. Suitable for day case treatment
Participant exclusion criteria1. Current deep vein thrombosis
2. Deep venous incompetence
3. Acute superficial vein thrombosis
4. Allergy to sclerosant
5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
6. History of hypercoagulability
7. Arterial disease (ankle brachial pressure index <0.8)
8. Inability to mobilise post-procedure
9. Needle phobia
10. Long or short saphenous vein less than 3 mm in diameter or greater than 15 mm and tortuous veins that are considered to be unsuitable for endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) due to difficulties in passing the guide wire
11. Inability to complete study questionnaires
Recruitment start date01/06/2008
Recruitment end date31/05/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Aberdeen (UK)
University/education

c/o Dr E Rattray
Research & Innovation
University Office
Kings College
Aberdeen
AB24 3FX
Scotland
United Kingdom

Website http://www.abdn.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/016476m91

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 25/09/2014 Yes No
Results article results 01/11/2014 Yes No
Results article results 01/04/2015 Yes No
Results article 5-year results 05/09/2019 Yes No

Editorial Notes

05/09/2019: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
07/06/2016: Plain English summary added.