Feasibility study for the development of a sero-correlate of protection against invasive Group B Streptococcus disease (the iGBS study)
ISRCTN | ISRCTN49326091 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN49326091 |
Secondary identifying numbers | 1.0; HTA 17/153/01 |
- Submission date
- 02/07/2018
- Registration date
- 09/07/2018
- Last edited
- 19/08/2022
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Infections and Infestations
Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a bacterium (bug) that causes infection in young infants in all regions of the world. Worldwide in 2015 it was estimated that there were at least 319,000 infants under 3 months of age with GBS disease, resulting in 90,000 deaths and at least 10,000 children with long-term disabilities. Babies mostly acquire the GBS bacteria from their mothers around the time of birth and around 20% of all pregnant women carry GBS in their bowel and vagina. The global burden of GBS is therefore high and the options for prevention are currently limited. An effective vaccine that could be given to pregnant women has the greatest potential to benefit mothers and babies worldwide and such vaccines are now being tested in clinical trials, including in pregnant women. To license a new vaccine so that it can be recommended for routine use usually requires evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective in preventing the disease. This usually means undertaking a large trial in which the new vaccine is given to half of the subjects, who are then compared to the other half who did not receive the new vaccine. Such trials are expensive and time-consuming to perform. Another way of licensing a new vaccine is to show that when it is given to relevant groups of people it is able to produce levels of immunity (usually measured as antibodies) in their blood that are known to result in protection. Such levels are called serocorrelates (because they “correlate” with protection). Although there is considerable evidence that high levels of antibody against GBS in pregnant women do correlate with protection against GBS disease in their babies, the precise level (the serocorrelate) is not currently known. Although GBS is the most common cause of serious early infections in UK babies it is still relatively rare overall, so around 150,000 babies will need to be followed in order to find at least 150 babies with GBS disease, which is around the number needed to establish the serocorrelates of protection. The aim of this smaller (feasibility) study of around 4000 women is to assess the recruitment and test the methods. If this feasibility study works well this will lead to a larger study to address the question of how much antibody is needed to protect against invasive infant GBS disease.
Who can participate?
Pregnant women aged 18 and over who are delivering at one of the selected hospitals
What does the study involve?
A small sample of blood is collected from pregnant women and/or from the cord of their newborn babies at delivery and stored in the laboratory. With the cooperation of paediatricians and microbiologists the researchers are alerted if any of the babies develop GBS disease over the next 3 months. For those who do, the level in their blood samples at birth is then compared with that of other babies who did not develop GBS disease. Because many babies acquire GBS from their mothers at birth a smaller number of the mothers have a swab taken to see if they are carrying GBS around the time of birth.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The antibody tests will help in the development and licensure of GBS vaccines for pregnant women. It is hoped that the results of this study will help to stop babies from becoming sick with GBS disease in the future. A blood sample can cause anxiety for some people and is associated with mild, temporary discomfort. There is a small risk of fainting, bruising and infection. All blood sampling is performed by trained members of the study team. If required, a blood sample may be needed from the baby at 1-3 months (less than a teaspoon full). This can cause discomfort but common distraction techniques, such as breastfeeding, can be used to minimize this. In the unlikely case of a stillbirth, participants are still asked if they are happy to consent for a blood test. This can provide useful information as GBS is a cause of stillbirths.
Where is the study run from?
1. St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
2. Kingston Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
3. Croydon University Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
4. East Surrey Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
5. Poole Hospital NHS Trust (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2018 to August 2020
Who is funding the study?
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Prof. Paul Heath
Contact information
Scientific
St George's University of London
Cranmer Terrace
Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group
Jenner Wing, Level 2
London
SW17 0RE
United Kingdom
0000-0002-7540-7433 |
Study information
Study design | Multicentre prospective cohort study |
---|---|
Primary study design | Observational |
Secondary study design | Cohort study |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Other |
Participant information sheet | https://www.sgul.ac.uk/images/iGBS/PIS%20for%20website%20KH,%20SGH.pdf |
Scientific title | Feasibility study for the development of a sero-correlate of protection against invasive Group B Streptococcus disease |
Study acronym | iGBS |
Study hypothesis | What are the Group B Streptococcus (GBS) capsular polysaccharide serotype-specific IgG immunecorrelates of protection against the most prevalent serotypes of GBS causing invasive infant disease (iGBS)? Aims and objectives: Given the anticipated study size of this study and its logistic complexities, the aim of this initial feasibility study is to test key operational aspects of the study design of such a study. The feasibility study aims to collect data on maternal GBS colonizing serotype prevalence, anti-capsular IgG concentrations, kinetics of antibody transfer and IgG decay in the first three months of life and enable sample size and power assumptions for the main study to be assessed. |
Ethics approval(s) | West Midlands - Solihull, 15/06/2018, REC ref: 18/WM/0147 |
Condition | Invasive infant disease caused by Group B Streptococcus |
Intervention | The trialists will establish maternal delivery/infant cord serum collection from 5 maternity units (around 4000 women) and test the feasibility of their strategies. They will collect a small sample of blood from pregnant women and/or from the cord of their newborn babies at delivery and store these samples in the laboratory. With the cooperation of paediatricians and microbiologists they will be alerted if any of the babies develop GBS disease over the next 3 months (cases). For those who do, the trialists can then compare the level in their blood samples at birth with that of other babies (controls) who did not develop GBS disease. Because many babies acquire the GBS from their mothers at birth the trialist will also carry out a sub-study in which 1000 mothers will have a vaginal-rectal swab taken to see if they are carrying GBS around the time of birth. The babies of mothers identified as carrying GBS will be the control babies as they were known to be exposed to GBS at birth but didn’t develop GBS disease. The trialists will assess the following parameters: 1. Enrollment rate (the rate (proportion) of eligible women who are willing to participate in the blood collection study) 2. Maternal and/or cord blood collection rate 3. The impact of different timings related to blood sample processing and storage 4. Key clinical data collection rate 5. Rectovaginal swab/delivery blood sample study enrollment rate 6. Rectovaginal swab and delivery blood sample collection rate 7. Infant blood sample study consent rate 8. Infant surveillance consent rate The collection of blood samples in colonised women will be used to derive estimates of GBS anticapsular IgG concentrations using a standardised assay. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | The feasibility of collecting serum at delivery (either maternal or cord or both) from a large cohort of pregnant women, assessed using: 1. Enrolment rate (the rate (proportion) of eligible women who are willing to participate in the delivery blood collection study) 2. Maternal and/or cord blood collection rate 3. Key clinical exclusion data (gestation at birth, receipt of IAP in labour (yes/no), type of IAP (list), time between administration of IAP and delivery (in hours) collection rate) 4. Infant iGBS surveillance consent rate |
Secondary outcome measures | In the sub-study the following are assessed at delivery: 1. Rectovaginal swab study consent rate 2. Rectovaginal swab collection rate 3. Rectovaginal GBS colonisation rate 4. Rectovaginal GBS CPS serotype-specific colonisation rates In the sub-study where samples of maternal/cord blood and rectovaginal swabs are available, the following are assessed at delivery: 1. Infant blood sample study consent rate 2. Infant Guthrie card consent rate 3. Infant Guthrie card collection rate |
Overall study start date | 01/06/2018 |
Overall study end date | 31/08/2020 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Female |
Target number of participants | Approximately 4000 |
Total final enrolment | 1823 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Pregnant 2. ≥ 18 years of age 3. Delivering at one of the selected hospitals 4. Consented to participate during the study period |
Participant exclusion criteria | Does not meet the inclusion criteria |
Recruitment start date | 02/07/2018 |
Recruitment end date | 31/12/2018 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centres
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
Kingston upon Thames
Kingston
KT2 7QB
United Kingdom
Croydon
CR7 7YE
United Kingdom
Redhill
RH1 5RH
United Kingdom
Poole
BH15 2JB
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
St George's Joint Research Enterprise Services
Hunter Wing, Ground Floor
Cranmer Terrace
London
SW17 0QT
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)208 725 0794 |
---|---|
researchgovernance@sgul.ac.uk | |
Website | https://www.stgeorges.nhs.uk/ |
https://ror.org/039zedc16 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 01/06/2019 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Stored in repository |
Publication and dissemination plan | The protocol has not been published but is available on request. The trialists are planning to publish the outcomes of the feasibility study and sub-studies in early 2019. |
IPD sharing plan | All data will be stored in an online format on the RedCap database. Data in this database will be anonymised, with each participant being identified by a unique participant ID. No patient identifiable information will be stored on RedCap. Research midwives and members of the research team all have secure password protected accounts that allow them to input data onto this form. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/12/2019 | 20/12/2019 | Yes | No |
Protocol file | version 9.0 | 06/10/2020 | 19/08/2022 | No | No |
Additional files
Editorial Notes
19/08/2022: Protocol file uploaded.
15/04/2020: The overall trial end date was changed from 01/03/2020 to 31/08/2020.
22/01/2020: The overall trial end date was changed from 01/02/2019 to 01/03/2020.
20/12/2019: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
07/11/2018: The following changes were made:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 02/10/2018 to 31/12/2018.
2. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/12/2018 to 01/02/2019.
3. The intention to publish date was changed from 30/04/2019 to 01/06/2019.