Can a test of preterm labour (quantitative fetal fibronectin) help diagnosis and clinical decision making?

ISRCTN ISRCTN41598423
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN41598423
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 14/32/01
Submission date
15/10/2015
Registration date
27/10/2015
Last edited
10/09/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
About 11% of all babies born worldwide are preterm (premature) meaning that they are born more than three weeks before their due date. Accurately predicting whether a woman will have a preterm delivery is notoriously challenging. Up to 80% of women who show signs of preterm labour remain pregnant after 7 days. Despite this, many women are given treatments aimed at preventing complications for their babies, should they be premature. This can be very costly and little is known about the effects for mothers and their babies if a preterm delivery does not take place. Fetal fibronectin (fFN) is a “glue-like” protein which attaches the amniotic sac (the fluid sac that contains and protects a fetus) to the lining of the womb. At the end of pregnancy, fFN begins to break down and can be detected in vaginal fluid. By measuring the concentration of fFN, it is possible to predict whether the baby is likely to arrive prematurely (quantitative foetal Fibronectin test). Generally, the result will either be positive (showing the fFN is present and so there is an increased chance of labour) or negative (where it is not present, ruling out the chance of labour). The aim of this study is to find out how accurate the quantitative foetal Fibronectin (qfFN) test is at predicting preterm delivery. The results are compared with two pre-term birth marker tests currently available in the NHS (Actim Partus and Partosure).

Who can participate?
Women who are showing signs of going into labour prematurely.

What does the study involve?
Women have a vaginal swab taken so that levels of quantitative fetal fibronectin can be measured. This will allow the researchers to predict the chance of the women delivering their babies prematurely over the next seven days. Two additional vaginal swabs are also taken for the Actim Partus and Partosure tests. Regular contact is kept with the women in the form of telephone interviews so that the number of women who have had a preterm delivery can be measured.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits to women or their babies for participating in this study, although some women gain satisfaction from contributing research studies which will improve future care for women with preterm labour. There are very few risks from participation as qfFN is the most commonly used test for preterm labour, and it is considered to be safe. Knowledge of qfFN results may increase or decrease anxiety levels, and this will be assessed as part of the trial.

Where is the study run from?
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (lead centre) and three Scottish, four Welsh and 19 English hospitals (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2015 to January 2019 (as of 04/10/2018)

Who is funding the study?
Health Technology Assessment Programme (UK)

Who is the main contact?
1. Ms Lisa Wotherspoon (public)
lisa.wotherspoon@ed.ac.uk
2. Dr Sarah Stock (scientific)
sarah.stock@ed.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Ms Lisa Wotherspoon
Public

University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health
Queen's Medical Research Institute
47 Little France Crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4TJ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)131 242 6753
Email lisa.wotherspoon@ed.ac.uk
Dr Sarah Stock
Scientific

University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Reproductive Health
Queen's Medical Research Institute
47 Little France Crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4TJ
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-4308-856X
Phone +44 (0)131 242 6449
Email sarah.stock@ed.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulti-centre prospective cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleQUIDS – Quantitative Fibronectin to help Decision-making in women with Symptoms of Preterm Labour
Study acronymQUIDS
Study hypothesisIn women with symptoms suggestive of preterm labour, quantitative fetal fibronectin will help rule out preterm labour and aid decision making.
Ethics approval(s)1. QUIDS – West of Scotland REC 5, 22/03/2016, ref: 16/WS/0068
2. QUIDS 2 – West of Scotland REC 5, 10/05/2017, ref: 17/WS/0081
ConditionPreterm labour
InterventionWomen with symptoms of preterm labour (22-34 weeks gestational age) who are participating in the study will have a vaginal swab sample taken to test levels of quantitative fetal fibronectin in order to predict the likelihood of preterm delivery within the next 7 days. Women will be followed up until delivery to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

Added 15/03/2017:
QUIDS 2 sub study:
The sub study will involve taking two additional cervical swabs from the participants to be used for testing additional pre-term birth marker tests currently available in the NHS (Actim Partus and Partosure). These results will be compared to the results and the model developed in QUIDS.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureDelivery rate is measured within 7 days of enrollment in the study
Secondary outcome measures1. Acceptability of the qfFN, measured by telephone interviews in a subset of participants (n=30) at 48 hours following test
2. Anxiety, measured using the State Trait Anxiety Index questionnaire pre and 48 hours post test
3. Cost effectiveness of fFN measured by decison analytical modelling until discharge from hospital
4. Delivery within 48 hours of enrollment in the study
5. Rate of spontaneous preterm delivery before 34 weeks
6. Rate of spontaneous preterm delivery before 37 weeks
Overall study start date01/12/2015
Overall study end date30/01/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participantsQUIDS – 3000, QUIDS2 – 550
Total final enrolment2924
Participant inclusion criteria1. Women with signs and symptoms of preterm labour 24-34 weeks (or earlier gestation if the fetus is considered potentially viable) in whom hospital admission, inter-hospital transfer or treatment (antenatal steroids, tocolysis or magnesium sulphate) is being considered
2. Signs and symptoms may include any or all of the following:
2.1. Back pain
2.2. Abdominal cramping
2.3. Abdominal pain
2.4. Light vaginal bleeding
2.5. Vaginal pressure
2.6. Uterine tightenings or contractions
2.7. Cervical effacement or dilatation
Participant exclusion criteria1. Women who have moderate or severe vaginal bleeding
2. Women who have cervical dilatation greater or equal to 3cm
3. Women with confirmed rupture of membranes
4. Sexual intercourse, vaginal examination or transvaginal ultrasound in the preceding 24 hours factors can invalidate results and so these women will be initially excluded from the study. They can later be included if still symptomatic after 24 hours, when fFN accuracy will be restored
Recruitment start date01/09/2016
Recruitment end date31/10/2018

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
51 Little France Crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4TJ
United Kingdom
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Mindelsohn Way
Birmingham
B15 2TG
United Kingdom
Nottingham University Hospitals
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
West Middlesex University Hospital
Twickenham Road
Isleworth
TW7 6AF
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian ACCORD
University/education

Research & Development Management Suite
The Queen's Medical Research Institute
47 Little France Crescent
Edinburgh
EH16 4TJ
Scotland
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)131 242 3336
Email R&DOffice@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03q82t418

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/01/2020
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planThe data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 19/04/2018 Yes No
Protocol file version v7.0 16/08/2018 11/01/2019 No No
Protocol file version v5.0 23/10/2018 11/01/2019 No No
Results article Qualitative results 01/10/2019 12/08/2019 Yes No
Other publications Development and validation of a risk prediction model 06/07/2021 30/07/2021 Yes No
Funder report results 01/09/2021 10/09/2021 No No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN41598423_Protocol for QUIDS_v7.0_16Aug2018.pdf
Uploaded 11/01/2019
ISRCTN41598423_Protocol for QUIDS2_v5.0_23Oct2018.pdf
Uploaded 11/01/2019

Editorial Notes

10/09/2021: Publication reference added.
05/08/2021: Internal review.
30/07/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
12/08/2019: Publication reference added.
11/01/2019: The trial website has been added.
11/01/2019: Uploaded QUIDS2 protocol Version 5.0 23 October 2018 (not peer reviewed)
11/01/2019: Uploaded QUIDS protocol Version 7.0 16 August 2018 (not peer reviewed)
04/10/2018: The following changes have been made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial start date has been changed from 30/09/2018 to 30/01/2019
2. The recruitment end date has been changed from 31/08/2018 to 31/10/2018
3. The plain English summary has been updated
4. The intention to publish date has been changed from 01/10/2018 to 30/01/2020
23/04/2018: Publication reference added.
08/03/2018: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 30/04/2018 to 31/08/2018.
2. The target number of participants was changed from "QUIDS – 2100, QUIDS2 – 550" to "QUIDS – 3000, QUIDS2 – 550".

31/07/2017: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 31/08/2017 to 30/04/2018
2. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/05/2018 to 30/09/2018.
3. The target number of participants was changed from "1,600 for QUIDS; 1100 for the QUIDS 2 sub study" to "QUIDS – 2100, QUIDS2 – 550"
15/03/2017: The target number of participants was changed from "1,600" to "1,600; 1100 for the QUIDS 2 sub study".
24/03/2016: Ethics approval information added.

Springer Nature