Comparing a new test for tuberculosis with conventional tests

ISRCTN ISRCTN35629189
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN35629189
IRAS number 266798
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04909385
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 46846, IRAS 266798
Submission date
25/01/2021
Registration date
16/02/2021
Last edited
23/01/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infection caused by a bacterium called Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It can be diagnosed with procedures such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). BAL is a procedure where sterile water is injected into a segment of the lung and then suctioned back and sent for tests. EBUS-TBNA uses ultrasound to allow doctors to take samples of tissue just outside the lungs. This study will evaluate the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BAL samples for pulmonary TB and EBUS-TBNA samples for mediastinal TB and will compare the diagnostic performance against conventional tests (smear, culture, cytology), as well as to a clinical composite diagnosis, using a clinical expert panel reviewing the data blindly.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 and over suspected of having pulmonary TB or mediastinal TB undergoing a routine clinical bronchoscopy or EBUS-TBNA

What does the study involve?
Participants will follow the routine clinical pathway to investigate the diagnosis of possible TB and will have a BAL and/or EBUS-TBNA sample taken. The researchers will review their medical notes for clinical information and results related to your TB investigations such as blood tests, X-rays, BAL and/or EBUS-TBNA results. Participants will have follow-up arrangements in line with the local trust guidelines and the researchers will review any routine follow up data for a minimum of 3 months after the procedure if available. There will be no additional procedures, sampling or visits as the researchers will only use routinely available clinical and follow up information if available.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There will be no direct benefit to participants as their team are already using this test but they may be helping by showing that this test can be useful in testing lung samples taken through the bronchoscope for units that do have access to this routinely. As participants will be following the routine clinical pathway, there will be no additional risks or side effects of the study. Participation in this study will not alter the clinical management or the care participants receive as their clinical team are already using this test routinely.

Where is the study run from?
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial Clinical Respiratory Research Unit (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2020 to October 2021

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Onn Min Kon
Dr Mirae Park, imperial.respiratory.research@nhs.net

Contact information

Dr Mirae Park
Scientific

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Praed Street
London
W2 1NY
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)2033125734
Email Mirae.park@nhs.net

Study information

Study designNon-randomized; Both; Design type: Diagnosis, Device, Cohort study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designNon randomised study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet See additional files
Scientific titleXpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for pulmonary TB and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples for mediastinal TB
Study acronymTRiBE
Study hypothesis1. Xpert Ultra will have a higher diagnostic sensitivity compared to smear microscopy in clinically defined and treated TB cases using a composite diagnosis (category 1 and 2) in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples for pulmonary and mediastinal TB.
2. Xpert Ultra will have a higher diagnostic sensitivity compared to smear microscopy in culture-positive TB cases (category 1) in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples for pulmonary and mediastinal TB.
3. Xpert Ultra will have a higher diagnostic sensitivity compared to smear microscopy in culture-negative clinically defined TB cases (category 2) in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples for pulmonary and mediastinal TB.
4. Xpert Ultra will have a higher diagnostic sensitivity compared to culture in clinically defined and treated TB cases (category 1 and 2) in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples for pulmonary and mediastinal TB.
5. Xpert Ultra will provide more rapid TB diagnostics compared to the current gold standard of culture in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples for pulmonary and mediastinal TB.
6. ‘Trace’ reading from Xpert Ultra will correlate with a true positive result in patients who have not had previous TB or previously had treatment for active or latent TB in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples for pulmonary and mediastinal TB.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 07/10/2020, South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee 01 (Waverley Gate, 2-4 Waterloo Place, Edinburgh, EH1 3EG, UK; +44 (0)131 465 5473; Sandra.Wyllie@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk), REC ref: 20/SS/0089
ConditionTuberculosis
InterventionThis is a prospective multi-centre study across the UK including London, Birmingham, Leicester and Manchester which account for the highest proportion of TB cases in the UK. These are centres routinely investigate patients with suspected TB and routinely use Xpert Ultra in their practice.

Any patient who is suspected of having pulmonary or mediastinal TB who is routinely undergoing a bronchoscopy or EBUS-TBNA for clinical purposes will be recruited. These patients will be identified mainly by the TB services but also via Accident and Emergency, wards and clinics. Inclusion criteria include any consenting adult ≥18 years of age suspected of having pulmonary or mediastinal TB who is undergoing a routine clinical bronchoscopy for BAL or EBUS-TBNA.

Any patient identified who need a bronchoscopy or EBUS-TBNA for suspected TB will have this done in the local hospital. Patients will follow the routine follow up arrangements in line with the local trust guidelines but the researchers will review any routine follow up data up to 3 month post-procedure if available. There will be no additional procedures or visits as the researchers will merely use routinely available clinical data and follow up data if available.

The study aims to recruit a minimum of 323 participants undergoing a BAL, and 323 participants undergoing an EBUS-TBNA for a minimum of 6 months or until the recruitment targets are reached. The researchers will review any routine follow up data for a minimum of 3 months post-procedure. There will be no additional study follow up visits.

The study outcome is the diagnostic performance of Xpert Ultra in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples in patients with suspected TB against conventional modalities available (smear microscopy, culture, cytology) using a subgroup analysis of the different clinical categories attributing to the likely TB diagnosis incorporating follow-up data and the clinician’s decision to treat. A clinical expert panel will review the culture-negative cases blindly to categorise each case into a clinical diagnosis category.

Category Criteria:
1. Culture confirmed TB: Microbiological culture of MTB, and clinical and radiological findings suggestive of TB.
2. Highly probable TB: Clinical and radiological features highly suggestive of TB and unlikely to be caused by other diseases, a decision to treat made by a clinician, appropriate response to therapy, and histological evidence if available.
3. Clinically indeterminate diagnosis: Final diagnosis of TB neither highly probable nor reliably excluded.
4. Highly unlikely or TB excluded: Other diagnosis made other than TB (e.g. sarcoidosis, cancer or lymphoma).

Prospective data will be collected from Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London North West University Health Care NHS Trust, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free London NHS Trust, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Trust, Barts Health NHS Trust, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust which together serve a diverse cultural population with a high prevalence of TB in the UK and offer EBUS-TBNA services.

Clinical (patient demographics, medical history, TB symptoms, previous TB, history of exposure to TB, medications, HIV status and immunosuppression), microbiological, cytological data, radiology and biomarkers of infection will be collected throughout the study and documented on the following case report forms (CRFs). A paper or electronic CRF will be used as a clinical data collection tool which will comply with GCP, FDA CFR-21 Part-11, and HIPAA.

This data will be collected by the local clinical team, a clinical research fellow or research nurses using participant hospital records or from the participant directly. Personal data will be kept in pseudo-anonymised form with a link code which can be used to refer to the participant’s information. This link code will only be available to the clinical or clinical research team. There will be an audit trail of the staff entering the data.

Statistical analysis software will also be used such as R, GraphPad Prism, SPSS to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. There will also be an analysis of the differences in time to results being available in the different modalities using paired analysis.

Measures such as the mean and standard deviation will be used to summarise continuous variables. Tables reporting the numbers and percentages will be used for categorical variables such as TB. The Kappa statistic will be used to compare results from different tests. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare categorical variables such as TB and ethnicity. The t-test will be used to compare the average number of years in two groups. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction will be used to compare the average number of years in different clinical categories. Logistic regression will be used to look at factors associated with TB. Factors include HIV, diabetes, ethnicity, sex, and years in UK, having previous TB and other social risk factors such as smoking status.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe diagnostic performance of Xpert Ultra in BAL and EBUS-TBNA samples in patients with suspected TB against conventional modalities available (smear microscopy, culture, cytology) using a subgroup analysis of the different clinical categories attributing to the likely TB diagnosis, measured at a single timepoint
Secondary outcome measures1. Turn-around time for Xpert Ultra against standard smear, culture, cytology results and its effects on treatment decisions, measured using clinical, microbiological, cytological data, radiology and biomarkers of infection collected throughout the study
2. The operating characteristics of this platform in varying clinical phenotypes, evaluated by stratifying patients based on risk factors, clinical presentations, radiological appearances and histological results and comparing this with Xpert Ultra results (including ‘trace’) at a single timepoint
Overall study start date07/10/2020
Overall study end date29/02/2024

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 646; UK Sample Size: 646
Total final enrolment394
Participant inclusion criteriaAny consenting adult ≥18 years of age suspected of having pulmonary TB or mediastinal TB who is undergoing a routine clinical bronchoscopy or EBUS-TBNA
Participant exclusion criteriaAny patient who has had a BAL or EBUS-TBNA but has not had Xpert Ultra testing as part of routine diagnostics for possible TB
Recruitment start date17/08/2020
Recruitment end date29/02/2024

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

St Mary's Hospital (lead site)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Praed Street
London
W2 1NY
United Kingdom
Chelsea & Westminster Hospital
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
369 Fulham Road
London
SW10 9NH
United Kingdom
Hillingdon Hospital
The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Pield Heath Road
Uxbridge
UB8 3NN
United Kingdom
The Royal London Hospital
Barts Health NHS Trust
Whitechapel
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom
University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Trust HQ
PO Box 955
Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TH
United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Infirmary Square
Leicester
LE1 5WW
United Kingdom
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Cobbett House
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Royal Free Hospital
Royal Free London NHS Trust
Pond Street
London
NW3 2QG
United Kingdom
Northwick Park Hospital
London North West University Health Care NHS Trust
Watford Road
Harrow
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Keith Boland
Medical School Building
Norfolk Place
London
W2 1PG
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7594 9480
Email k.boland@imperial.ac.uk
Website http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/056ffv270

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health and Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/10/2022
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryOther
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study during this study will be included in the subsequent results publication

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

23/01/2024: The following changes were made:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 31/07/2021 to 29/02/2024.
2. The overall study end date was changed from 31/10/2021 to 29/02/2024.
3. The total final enrolment was added.
19/07/2021: ClinicalTrials.gov number added.
23/03/2021: The target number of participants was changed from 394 to 646.
25/01/2021: Trial's existence confirmed by the NIHR.