Early removal of Fallopian tubes and delayed removal of ovaries in women at high risk of ovarian cancer

ISRCTN ISRCTN25173360
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25173360
IRAS number 237992
Secondary identifying numbers IRAS project ID: 237992
Submission date
04/06/2018
Registration date
14/06/2018
Last edited
10/03/2021
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/find-a-clinical-trial/a-study-to-prevent-ovarian-cancer-by-removing-the-fallopian-tubes-and-then-the-ovaries-protector (added 10/03/2021)

Background and study aims
Some women have an inheritable fault in their genetic code which increases their risk of developing ovarian cancer. Genes in which a fault may lie are BRCA1/ BRCA2/ RAD51C/ RAD51D/ BRIP1. Some women with a strong family history of ovarian cancer or breast and ovarian cancer may also be at increased risk. There is currently no screening programme for ovarian cancer available on the NHS. Therefore current practice is to offer women at increased risk, once they have completed their family, an operation to remove their fallopian tubes and ovaries. This procedure is called risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. This is the best known way to prevent ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. However, in women who are premenopausal it leads to early menopause. Early menopause has serious health implications. It results in menopausal type symptoms (e.g. hot flushes, changes in mood, reduced sex drive), increased risk of osteoporosis (brittle bones), heart disease, stroke, dementia and sexual problems. Research suggests many ovarian cancers start in the fallopian tube. This has led to the proposal of an alternative strategy to prevent ovarian cancer. This involves having the operation in two stages. The first operation involves removing the fallopian tubes alone. This is called 'early salpingectomy’. The second operation removes the ovaries after natural menopause (average age 51 in the UK). This is called 'delayed oophorectomy’. The advantage of this two-stage alternative is that it offers some protection against ovarian cancer in young women whilst avoiding negative health consequences of early menopause.
The aim of the PROTECTOR study is to assess the impact of this two-stage alternative approach on sexual function. The study also evaluates the impact on quality of life, hormonal well-being, psychological well-being and overall satisfaction. Outcomes from this new approach are compared to the traditional approach of removal of both tubes and ovaries at the same operation. We also compare this to the well-being of women who do not have an operation.

Who can participate?
Women at increased risk of developing ovarian cance, who are aged 30 years and over and have not gone through the menopause.

What does the study involve?
Participants will be given the choice of which arm of the study they wish to be part of:
1. RRESDO (risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy): the new, two-stage operation (initial removal of tubes alone, followed by later removal of ovaries at a second operation after natural menopause or sooner if requested).
2. RRSO (risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy): removal of both tubes and ovaries at the same time. This is the current standard operation offered on the NHS to prevent ovarian cancer.
3. Controls: no operation involved.
Everyone will be required to complete questionnaires at the start of the study and annually. These ask about medical history, family history, quality of life, sexual function, cancer worry, psychological well-being and how satisfied individuals are with their decision.
All participants will also have a blood test at the start of the study and during follow up for a hormone called FSH. This will provide information on how the ovaries are functioning. Women who decide to have an operation to prevent ovarian cancer (either RRSO or RRESDO) will have a baseline ultrasound scan to look at the ovaries and a blood test for an ovarian cancer marker called CA125.
A small number of women from each study arm will be approached to take part in an optional interview. Interviews will explore views on acceptability, interest, factors influencing decision-making and willingness to undergo the new two-stage operation. Those who go on to have an operation (RRESDO/RRSO), will be contacted 1 year after their operation for a follow-up interview to discuss their satisfaction with the process and their general health and wellbeing.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits include:
1. The opportunity of having a two staged operation (RRESDO) to prevent ovarian cancer. This is not currently routinely available outside the study. It involves removal of the tubes in the first step followed by removal of ovaries at a later date.
2. Removal of the tubes alone will provide some protection against developing ovarian cancer and also preserve ovarian function which will delay or avoid early menopause. This can prevent the adverse health consequences of early menopause.
3. Participants will be given the choice of deciding which arm of the study they wish to be a part of: RRESDO (new procedure), RRSO (current standard practice), or controls (no surgery).
4. Participants will be contributing to research into preventing ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. Results of this study will help us better understand the impact of the new two stage procedure. This will help develop future clinical care guidelines and plan future care pathways for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Risks:
1. Although there is evidence to suggest removal of tubes alone provides some protection against developing ovarian cancer, the precise extent of this protection is unclear. There is the possibility of getting ovarian cancer despite removal of tubes.
2. It is unclear if a possible benefit of reduced breast cancer risk is lost by not removing ovaries before menopause.
3. The two-stage option (RRESDO) involves two operations instead of one (RRSO: removal of both tubes and ovaries). Each operation has potential complications. As there are two operations this may lead to more complications overall.
4. There is concern that not everyone having their tubes removed initially will go on to have their ovaries removed at a later date. This would mean that these women who don’t do so could still remain at an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.

Where is the study run from?
Queen Mary University of London (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2018 to July 2028

Who is funding the study?
Barts and the London Charity

Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Ranjit Manchanda (scientific)
r.manchanda@qmul.ac.uk
2. Dr Faiza Gaba (public)
f.gaba@qmul.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Ranjit Manchanda
Scientific

Barts Cancer Institute
Queen Mary University of London
Room 4
Basement
Old Anatomy Building
Charterhouse Square
London
EC1M 6BQ
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-3381-5057
Phone +44 (0)7979 884575
Email r.manchanda@qmul.ac.uk
Dr Faiza Gaba
Public

Barts Cancer Institute
ECMC
Queen Mary University of London
Charterhouse Square
London
EC1M 6BQ
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-4081-6883
Phone +44 (0)20 7882 8491
Email f.gaba@qmul.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulticentre prospective three-armed cohort study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designNon randomised study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet ISRCTN25173360_PIS_v4_16Apr2018.pdf
Scientific titlePreventing Ovarian Cancer through early Excision of Tubes and late Ovarian Removal
Study acronymPROTECTOR
Study hypothesis1. Early salpingectomy is non-inferior for sexual function compared to no surgery.
2. Early salpingectomy is superior for sexual function and non-inferior in terms of quality of life compared to the standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
Ethics approval(s)London - Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee, 18/04/2018, ref: 18/LO/0555
ConditionPrevention of ovarian cancer
InterventionParticipants who meet the eligibility criteria and who have been identified through various NHS outpatient clinics, GP-surgeries or who have self-referred to the study team, self-select which of the three study arms they wish to participate in: risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO); risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO); controls (no surgery).

Baseline investigations
Participants enrolled into the two surgical arms (RRESDO/RRSO) have a CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound of the pelvis. Participants in all three arms have a baseline FSH as a measure of ovarian function and are required to complete interventional questionnaires that collect data on medical and reproductive history, socio-demographics, family history of cancers, endocrine symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction, psychological health and cancer risk perception and worry.

RRSO arm
Participants who have completed their family undergo risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and peritoneal washings. A strict histopathological SEE-FIM based protocol is followed and pathology samples are sent for central pathology review..

RRESDO arm
Participants who have completed their family undergo surgery in two stages. The first stage involves salpingectomy and peritoneal washings. The second stage involves oophorectomy and peritoneal washings once natural menopause has been reached (or sooner if requested). A strict histopathological SEE-FIM based protocol is followed and pathology samples are sent for central pathology review.

Control arm
Participants do not undergo surgery but undergo a blood test measuring FSH levels and are required to complete the interventional questionnaires.

Qualitative in-depth interviews
A small number of women from each of the three study arms are invited to one-to-one semi-structured in depth interviews to explore acceptability, interest, factors influencing decision making and willingness to undergo RRESDO. Women who elected to have surgery are followed up with another interview one year post salpingectomy/RRSO to explore satisfaction with the counselling process and the effects of surgery on health and wellbeing.

Follow up
All participants are followed up with annual questionnaires and FSH levels (annually after salpingectomy/control arm; 3 months after RRSO/delayed oophorectomy).
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureSexual function measured using the Sexual Activity Questionnaire and Sexual Quality of Life 3D (SQOL-3D) questionnaire completed at baseline, 3 months post surgery and annually.
Secondary outcome measures1. Endocrine function and menopause is measured using the FACT-ES questionnaire completed at baseline, 3 months post surgery, annually and FSH levels measured 3 months after surgery and annually (ealry salpingectomy/control arm)
2. Quality of life measured using the EQ5D-5L questionnaire completed at baseline, 3 months post surgery and annually
3. Satisfaction/regret is measured using the 5-item Decision Regret Scale (O'Connor, Ottawa 1996) and 1-item ('I am satisfied with the decision I have made' on a 5-point Likert scale from Madalinska et al, 2005) completed at baseline, 3 months post surgery and annually
4. Surgical morbidity measured by recording complications experienced by the participant 4 weeks after surgery during the post-surgical clinic review
5. Psychological health measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), assessing cancer worry using the 4-item scale from Lerman et al and measuring intrusive thoughts using the Impact of Events Scale (7 intrusive items, Horowitz et al, 1997) completed at baseline, 3 months post surgery and annually
6. Number of serous-tubal-intraepithelial-carcinoma (STIC)/invasive (tubal/ovarian/peritoneal/non-ovarian) cancers will be recorded following histopathology review by a central pathology review committee using the SEE-FIM protocol
7. Utility scores for early salpingectomy will be derived using the Sexual Quality of Life 3D (SQOL-3D) questionnaire
8. Cost-effectiveness (incremental cost effectiveness ratio per quality adjusted life years (ICER/QALY)) of early salpingectomy/delayed oophorectomy will be established via a cost utility analysis performed using a Markov model
9. A national register of women undergoing early salpingectomy will be created by collating the details of all participants who have undergone early salpingectomy as part of the trial
Overall study start date01/01/2017
Overall study end date01/07/2028

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit30 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participants1000
Participant inclusion criteria1. Women at increased risk of ovarian cancer: BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers; RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1 mutation carriers; strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer or ovarian cancer alone.
2. Premenopausal
3. Aged ≥30 years.
4. Completed family (for surgical arms)
Participant exclusion criteria1. Previous bilateral-salpingectomy or bilateral-oophorectomy.
2. Postmenopausal (amenorrhoea ≥1year (uterus in situ) / FSH >40).
3. Previous tubal/ovarian/peritoneal malignancy
4. <12 months post cancer treatment
5. Pregnancy
6. Clinical suspicion of tubal/ovarian cancer at baseline
7. Inability to provide informed consent
Recruitment start date01/07/2018
Recruitment end date01/07/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Northern Ireland
  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom
  • Wales

Study participating centres

Barts Health NHS Trust
W Smithfield
London
EC1A 7BE
United Kingdom
University College London Hospital Foundation Trust
235 Euston Rd, Fitzrovia
London
NW1 2BU
United Kingdom
Belfast Health & Social Care Trust
Belfast
BT9 7AB
United Kingdom
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hills Rd
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Southmoor Rd, Wythenshawe
Manchester
M23 9LT
United Kingdom
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Mindelsohn Way
Birmingham
B15 2TH
United Kingdom
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
Great Maze Pond
London
SE1 9RT
United Kingdom
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea
London
SW3 6JJ
United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
The Bays
S Wharf Rd
Paddington
London
W2 1NY
United Kingdom
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian
Foresterhill
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
Tonbridge Rd
Tunbridge Wells
TN2 4QJ
United Kingdom
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals
Colney Ln
Norwich
NR4 7UY
United Kingdom
Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
Queen Elizabeth Ave
Gateshead
NE9 6SX
United Kingdom
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Upper Maudlin St
Bristol
BS2 8HW
United Kingdom
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Eastern Rd
Brighton
BN2 5BE
United Kingdom
Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals
Dudley Rd
Birmingham
B18 7QH
United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals
Headley Way, Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Guildford Rd, Lyne
Chertsey
KT16 0PZ
United Kingdom
Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust
Cardiff
CF14 4XW
United Kingdom
Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospitals
Watford Rd, Harrow
London
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Infirmary Square
Leicester
LE1 5WW
United Kingdom
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Southwick Hill Rd, Cosham
Portsmouth
PO6 3LY
United Kingdom
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust
Great Ormond St
London
WC1N 3JH
United Kingdom
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
Ethelbert Rd
Canterbury
CT1 3NG
United Kingdom
Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside
James Arrott Dr
Dundee
DD2 1SY
United Kingdom
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
Rom Valley Way
Romford
RM7 0AG
United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Tremona Rd
Southampton
SO16 6YD
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Queen Mary University of London
University/education

Joint Research Management Office
5 Walden Street
London
E1 2EF
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7882 7260
Email sponsorsrep@bartshealth.nhs.uk
Website http://www.qmul.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/026zzn846

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Barts and the London Charity

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/07/2029
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryOther
Publication and dissemination planResults of the research will be presented at scientific conferences and published in scientific journals. They will also be made available through cancer charities, patient support groups and the Queen Mary University of London website.
IPD sharing planThe data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet version v4 16/04/2018 02/04/2019 No Yes
Protocol article protocol 01/02/2021 11/09/2020 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN25173360_PIS_v4_16Apr2018.pdf
Uploaded 02/04/2019

Editorial Notes

10/03/2021: Link to lay summary on CRUK added to the plain English summary.
11/09/2020: Publication reference added.
02/04/2019: The participant information sheet has been uploaded.