Developing and evaluating the effectiveness of educational prompts in improving diabetes care

ISRCTN ISRCTN21863140
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21863140
Secondary identifying numbers 2005DIAB002
Submission date
05/07/2005
Registration date
25/07/2005
Last edited
17/08/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Robbie Foy
Scientific

Centre for Health Services Research
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
21 Claremont Place
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4AA
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)191 222 7214
Email R.C.Foy@ncl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific titleDeveloping and evaluating the effectiveness of educational prompts in improving diabetes care
Study hypothesisIn general practices receiving glycaemic educational messages attached to laboratory test reports, compared to those practices not, the number of HbA1c test requests will be higher and the mean HbA1c value will be lower. Similarly for cholesterol messages the number of cholesterol tests will be higher and the mean cholesterol value will be lower.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
ConditionDiabetes mellitus
InterventionShort educational messages added to paper and electronic general practice laboratory test reports of Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
Practices, stratified by list size, will be randomly allocated to each intervention (glycaemic control educational messages and cholesterol control educational messages) independently. In the first randomisation, practices will be allocated to receive the glycaemic educational messages or control (no glycaemic educational messages). In the second randomisation, practices will be allocated to receive the cholesterol educational messages or control (no cholesterol educational messages). This will result in four groups:
1. Practices receiving glycaemic and cholesterol educational messages
2. Practices receiving only glycaemic educational messages
3. Practices receiving only cholesterol educational messages
4. Practices receiving no educational messages
This will allow comparisons of the separate and combined effects of the two educational message interventions.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureNumber of HbA1c and cholesterol tests requested (standardised for practice size) and the general practice mean levels of HbA1c and cholesterol.
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/07/2005
Overall study end date31/07/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupOther
SexBoth
Target number of participants39 practices
Participant inclusion criteriaGeneral practices in Newcastle upon Tyne
Participant exclusion criteriaDoes not meet inclusion criteria
Recruitment start date01/07/2005
Recruitment end date31/07/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Centre for Health Services Research
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4AA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Newcastle Primary Care NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research and Development Department
Benfield Road
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE6 4PF
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)191 219 6132
Email alison.emslie@newcastle-pct.nhs.uk

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Newcastle Primary Care NHS Trust (UK) (ref: 2005DIAB002) - The funding comes from service development rather than NHS R&D monies.

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 24/07/2007 Yes No
Results article results 16/12/2011 Yes No

Editorial Notes

17/08/2018: Publication reference added.