PFC vs Scorpio total knee replacement: effect of a single radius femoral component on recovery of range of movements

ISRCTN ISRCTN17519020
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17519020
Secondary identifying numbers N0155153523
Submission date
30/09/2005
Registration date
30/09/2005
Last edited
07/12/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr David Wright
Scientific

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
North Manchester General Hospital
Delaunays Road
Manchester
M8 5RB
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titlePFC vs Scorpio total knee replacement: effect of a single radius femoral component on recovery of range of movements
Study hypothesisDoes the scorpio total knee replacement allow patients to recover their range of movements more quickly in comparison to PFC knee replacement?
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
ConditionArthroplasty
InterventionDouble-blind randomised controlled trial
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureTime it takes to achieve a straight leg raise
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/12/2004
Overall study end date01/12/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participants50
Participant inclusion criteria25 patients with osteo-arthritis of the knee between the age of 60-75 years in each arm of the study
Participant exclusion criteria1. Patients outside 60-75 years
2. Valgus knee > 20 degrees
3. Any vascular compromise which would lead to a decision not to use a tourniquet
4. Any haematology condition which increases the risk of bleeding
Recruitment start date01/12/2004
Recruitment end date01/12/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

North Manchester General Hospital
Manchester
M8 5RB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Department of Health
Government

Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Government

Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)

No information available

Trust-Funded

No information available

NHS R&D Support Funding

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan