Does Ondansetron vs placebo Ondansetron and Metoclopramide vs placebo Metoclopramide (in addition to IV rehydration) reduce the rate of treatment failure in women suffering from nausea and vomiting in pregnancy

ISRCTN ISRCTN16924692
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16924692
EudraCT/CTIS number 2017-001651-31
Secondary identifying numbers 36233
Submission date
04/12/2017
Registration date
08/01/2018
Last edited
15/07/2022
Recruitment status
Stopped
Overall study status
Stopped
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Around 30% of women suffer from moderate to severe nausea and vomiting in pregnant (NVP), causing physical and emotional distress and reducing quality of life (QOL). The most severe form, hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), affects up to 3% of women, leading to dehydration, weight loss and nutrient deficiency. Moderate or severe NVP requires medical treatment, but care varies in different hospitals as some women have reported feeling unsupported, dissatisfied, anxious and depressed. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two drugs (metoclopramide and ondansetron) for treating women with severe symptoms of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) who have already tried using one anti-sickness drug but without improvement in their symptoms.

Who can participate?
Women attending hospital with severe NVP, 16+6 weeks pregnant or less, who have had little or no improvement whilst taking initial (first line) anti-sickness treatment.

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of groups. Those in the first group receive metoclopramide with a placebo (dummy medication). Those in the second group receive ondansetron with a placebo. Those in the third group receive metoclopramide and ondansetron. Those in the last group receive a double placebo. The medications are initially given into a vein three times a day for up to four days. Once women are able drink without vomiting, the same drugs are given by tablet for up to ten days. Participants are monitored and if at any point after 12 hours of treatment starting symptoms have not improved, the study drugs are deemed to have failed and the medical staff prescribes a third line antiemetic treatment. Patients are also offered the opportunity to take part in an interview. Both women who take part and those that decline are offered the opportunity to take part. These interviews are being carried out to help us understand the patient’s reason for participating or not participating in a complex trial of medication in pregnancy.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The study may not directly benefit participants but the study treatment in combination with IV rehydration may help alleviate their NVP symptoms. The information we gain from this study may help other patients in the future. Participants will also be more closely monitored and have follow up phone calls to check how they are doing, which would not normally happen. Participants may become sick again at the end of the 10 days when the study drugs are stopped. If this happens the participant can contact the doctors or midwives at the hospital or one of the research team members for advice. The research team and the participants will not know which of the study drugs the participant has received so if the participant felt better while taking part in the study, they will not be able to necessarily give them what they received while in the study. Participants will therefore be given whatever drug is normally given as part of standard care. This will probably be ondansetron or metoclopramide. Both drugs might cause side effects such as: drowsiness, restlessness, constipation, diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, visual disturbance (e.g., blurred vision), light headedness, irregular heart rhythm, (fast or slow), rash, itching, sensation of flushing. Metoclopramide very occasionally causes muscle spasms. In rare cases ondansetron and metoclopramide may react with some other prescription medication, such as antidepressants, sedatives, morphine, medication for epilepsy and some antibiotics. During the research study we will collect information about any reactions or side effects. Metoclopramide and ondansetron are licensed for use but not in pregnancy. However there is enough evidence for doctors to believe they are safe and both drugs are routinely used to treat pregnant women.

Where is the study run from?
This study is being run by the Newcastle University (UK) and takes place in hospitals in the UK.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2017 to January 2022

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Nicola Goudie (Scientific)
nicola.goudie@ncl.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Nicola Goudie
Scientific

Trial Manager
Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit
Newcastle University
1-4 Claremont Terrace
Newcastle upon Tyne
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4AE
United Kingdom

Phone +44 191 2087187
Email nicola.goudie@ncl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment, Drug
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleEMPOWER: EMesis in Pregnancy - Ondansetron With mEtoclopRamide
Study acronymEMPOWER
Study hypothesisThe aim of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of two drugs (metoclopramide and ondansetron) for treating women with severe symptoms of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) who have already tried using one anti-sickness drug but without improvement in their symptoms.
Ethics approval(s)North East – Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 REC, 30/11/2017, ref: 17/NE/0325
ConditionReproductive Health and Childbirth
InterventionParticipants initially receive the study drug via IV, they receive IV treatment 3 times per day, once they are able to tolerate liquids they are converted to oral treatment which they take three times daily. Participant can be allocated to one of four treatment groups – these are outlined below with details of the dosage they are given:
1. Metoclopramide (10 mg three times daily via IV and then tablets) + placebo (via IV and then tablets)
2. Ondansetron (4 mg three times daily via IV and then tablets) + placebo (via IV and then tablets)
3. Metoclopramide (10 mg three times daily (via IV and then tablets) + ondansetron (4 mg three times daily via IV and then tablets)
4. Double placebo three times daily (via IV and then tablets)

The study drug is initially given intravenously for up to four days. Once the women are able to tolerate fluids, the same drugs are given by tablet for up to ten days. Treatment lasts a maximum of ten days in total.

Follow up takes place at 48 hours post first dose of IMP, then at 5 days and the final follow up questionnaires at 10 days. Participants are then be followed up post birth via a review of their medical records.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTreatment failure is defined as the need for further treatment as a participant’s symptoms have worsened between 12 hours and 10 days post treatment initiation.
Secondary outcome measures1. Participant reported symptom severity is measured using PUQE at 48 hours, 5 days and 10 days post treatment commencing.
2. Participant reported severity of nausea is measured using VAS for nausea at 48 hours, 5 days and 10 days post treatment commencing.
3. Quality of life is measured using NVPQOL (Health-Related Quality of Life for Nausea and Vomiting during Pregnancy) at baseline and 10 days post treatment commencing
4. Anxiety, depression and social support will be measured using Edinburgh post-natal depression scale (EPDS) and State Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI] at baseline and 10 days
5. Anxiety, depression and social support will also be measured using the Maternity Social Support scale at baseline.
6. Clinical indicators of anti-emetic effectiveness is measured via:
6.1. Number of participants experiencing a treatment failure at 48 hours
6.2. Relapse rate at 5 and 10 days (defined as a PUQE score of ≤ 6 at 48 hours followed by an increase to > 12 at 5 / 10
days)
6.3. Remission rate at 10 days (defined as a PUQE score of ≤ 6 at 48 hours with return to persistent symptoms [PUQE
score of 7 or above] at 10 days)
6.4. Readmission rates (the number of participants readmitted with NVP within 10 days of recruitment and between 10
days of recruitment and 20 weeks of pregnancy)
6.5. Total in-patient days related to NVP between recruitment and 20 weeks of pregnancy and between 20 weeks of
pregnancy and delivery
6.6. Additional antiemetic use
7. Side effects and adverse events is measured by asking participants about the occurrence of side effects and adverse events at 48 hours, 5 days and 10 days
8. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes will be gathered via a chart review at 20 weeks gestation and birth
Overall study start date01/09/2017
Overall study end date31/01/2022
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)Participant recruitment issue

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 600; UK Sample Size: 600
Total final enrolment33
Participant inclusion criteriaCurrent inclusion criteria as of 20/05/2020:
1. Pregnant women suffering from severe NVP
2. Gestation ≤166/7 weeks
3. Taken first line antiemetic treatment (cyclizine, chlorpromazine, promethazine, prochlorperazine (as recommended by the RCOG [10]) or doxlamine/pyridoxine (a new licensed antihistamine), as prescribed i.e. over a minimum of 24 hours with no sustained improvement in symptoms
4. Age ≥18 years
5. Able to give informed consent
6. Able to read/understand written English


Previous inclusion criteria:
1. Pregnant women suffering from severe NVP (nausea and vomiting in pregnancy)
2. Gestation ≤166/7 weeks
3. Taken first line antiemetic treatment (cyclize, chlorpromazine, promethazine or prochlorperazine as recommended by the RCOG), as prescribed i.e. full course taken by participant in the current pregnancy with no sustained improvement in symptoms (over a minimum of 24 hours use)
4. Age ≥18 years
5. Able to give informed consent
6. Able to read/understand written English
Participant exclusion criteriaCurrent exclusion criteria as of 20/05/2020:
1. Allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs
2. Received either ondansetron or metoclopramide intravenously
3. Received either ondansetron or metoclopramide orally for more than 72 hours (with or without IV rehydration)
4. Pre-existing diagnosis of medical condition: type 1 and 2 diabetes, Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5, Graves’ disease, significant cardiac disease (including long QT syndrome), phaeochromocytoma, epilepsy (or other seizure disorder).
5. Moderate renal impairment (known CKD 3b/4/5 or serum creatinine > 100 micromoles/l in pregnancy)
6. Known pre-existing diagnosis of severe liver impairment (for example: ALT or AST of > 2.5 x upper limit of pregnancy normal)
7. Severe diarrhoea (definition >10 loose, watery stools in a day (24 hours))
8. Hypokalaemia
9. Known pre-existing diagnosis of hypomagnesaemia
10. Vomiting caused by another underlying condition/infection
11. Concomitant use of apomorphine, serotonergic drugs (e.g. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, lithium)
12. Confirmed diagnosis of severe lactose intolerance (for example: Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption)


Previous exclusion criteria:
1. Allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs
2. Prior treatment with the study drugs in this pregnancy
3. Pre-existing diagnosis of medical condition: type 1 and 2 diabetes, Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5, Graves’ disease, significant cardiac disease (including long QT syndrome), phaeochromocytoma, epilepsy (or other seizure disorder).
4. Moderate renal impairment (known CKD 3b/4/5 or Cr > 100 in pregnancy)
5. Severe liver impairment (ALT / AST > 150)
6. Severe diarrhoea (definition > 10 loose, watery stools in a day (24 hours))*
7. Hypokalaemia**
8. Vomiting caused by another underlying condition/infection
9. Concomitant use of apomorphine, serotonergic drugs (e.g. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, lithium)

*If a woman who has severe diarrhoea (as defined above) meets other inclusion criteria and is subsequently found to have a serum potassium > 3 mmol/L and has not yet been prescribed an antiemetic it would be reasonable to offer participation in EMPOWER.
**all women with severe NVP will have routine assessment of 'Urea & Electrolytes' - in the absence of severe diarrhoea women can be approached, consented and given study treatments before results are available. If the serum potassium is subsequently found to be low (< 3 mmol/L) they should not be withdrawn from the trial but the hypokalaemia corrected quickly with intravenous supplementation.
Recruitment start date01/02/2018
Recruitment end date12/08/2019

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Royal Victoria Infirmary
Queen Victoria Road
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4LP
United Kingdom
Sunderland Royal Hospital
Kayll Road
Sunderland
SR4 7TP
United Kingdom
The James Cook University Hospital
Marton Road
Middlesbrough
TS4 3BW
United Kingdom
St George’s Hospital (London)
Blackshaw Road
London
SW17 0QT
United Kingdom
St Thomas’ Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom
Birmingham Women’s Hospital
Mindlesohn Road
Birmingham
B15 2TG
United Kingdom
St James University Hospital
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Duckworth Lane
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Salford Royal Infirmary
The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom
Royal Stoke University Hospital
Royal Stoke University Hospital
Newcastle Road
Stoke-on-Trent
ST4 6QG
United Kingdom
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Cosham
Portsmouth
PO6 3LY
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

Freeman Hospital
Freeman Road
High Heaton
Newcastle-Upon-Tyne
NE7 7DN
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05p40t847

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health Research
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/01/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planThe Chief Investigator will co-ordinate dissemination of data from this trial. This will be achieved by publication in academic peer reviewed journals and dissemination through social media and the patient network, thereby reaching large numbers of women and health professionals. Findings will also be presented at national and international conferences (both academic and charity/voluntary sector based).

It is anticipated that there will be several outputs from EMPOWER. In addition to submitting the full study protocol for publication the aim is to submit the primary research paper, detailing the main results of EMPOWER, to a high impact academic peer reviewed journal as well as the HTA open access journal.

By publishing all components of the EMPOWER study in relevant journals and ensuring the results are included in relevant guidelines the aim is to maximise awareness (and impact) of the trial results to both academic and NHS clinical communities.
IPD sharing planThe data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article internal pilot results 01/11/2021 17/11/2021 Yes No
Results article qualitative study on trial recruitment failure 14/07/2022 15/07/2022 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

15/07/2022: Publication reference added.
17/11/2021: The study was stopped after the internal pilot phase due to slow recruitment. The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
20/05/2020: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The inclusion criteria were changed.
2. The exclusion criteria were changed.
3. The trial participating centres Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust were added.
22/10/2019: The recruitment end date was changed from 31/07/2020 to 12/08/2019.
29/03/2019: The condition has been changed from "Specialty: Reproductive health and childbirth, Primary sub-specialty: Maternal/ Fetal medicine; UKCRC code/ Disease: Reproductive Health and Childbirth/ Other maternal disorders predominantly related to pregnancy" to "Reproductive Health and Childbirth" following a request from the NIHR.