A randomised controlled trial of single antibiotic cement versus dual antibiotic cement in patients receiving a partial hip joint replacement after fracture

ISRCTN ISRCTN15606075
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15606075
Secondary identifying numbers 38386
Submission date
16/07/2018
Registration date
17/07/2018
Last edited
26/06/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
This study is comparing two types of treatments in patients who have suffered a hip fracture and need to have a partial hip replacement (also called a hemiarthroplasty). The hemiarthroplasty implant is inserted into the thigh bone and replaces the ‘ball’ part of the ‘ball-and-socket’ hip joint. ‘Bone cement’ is used to hold the implant in place. This study aims to compare two different antibiotic bone cement mixtures used to hold the implant in place. The results of this trial should show whether there is any difference in the rate of deep infection in patients when one of the two bone cement mixtures is used to hold their hemiarthroplasty implant in place. The information gained will help patients and their doctors make more informed decisions about the best way to reduce the risk of deep infection in this type of surgery.

Who can participate?
Patients 60 years of age or older who have been admitted to a participating hospital with a hip fracture that the surgeon feels should be treated with a hip hemiarthroplasty

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to receive one of two types of bone cement. The first type has a lower dose of a single type of antibiotic, and the second type has a higher dose of that same antibiotic, as well as a second type of antibiotic. Participants complete a questionnaire about their recovery by telephone at 120 days after their surgery.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There is no specific advantage to patients from taking part in the study. However, the results of this study will help to decide which treatment is best for patients with this type of injury. Any operation for a broken hip carries some risks. The risks of surgery with an implant include: bleeding requiring blood transfusion, infection, further fracture, dislocation, leg length discrepancy, blood clots, damage to nerves and blood vessels in the surgical area, and the risks associated with the anaesthetic. These risks are the same as for patients who are not part of this study. There are also uncommon risks associated with both types of cement. In a small number of cases, patients having a cemented replacement can have a reaction to the bone cement. If this were to occur, the anaesthetist and surgeon would continue treatment as per normal practice. This risk is the same for both types of bone cement.

Where is the study run from?
The study is sponsored by the Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and is managed by Oxford Trauma, a clinical trials research group which is a part of the Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS) at the University of Oxford. There will be 20+ hospitals from across the United Kingdom participating in the study.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2017 to December 2021

Who is funding the study?
Heraeus Medical GmbH

Who is the main contact?
Stephanie Wallis
white8-copal@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Ms Stephanie Wallis
Scientific

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Woodhorn Lane
Ashington
NE63 9JJ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 223111
Email White8-copal@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Prof Mike Reed
Scientific

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Woodhorn Lane
Ashington
NE63 9JJ
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment, Surgery
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleWHiTE 8 COPAL: a randomised controlled trial of low dose single antibiotic loaded cement versus high dose dual antibiotic loaded cement in patients receiving a hip hemiarthroplasty after fracture
Study acronymWHiTE 8 COPAL
Study hypothesisThis trial aims to establish if a high dose, dual antibiotic regime has fewer infections compared to low dose single antibiotic cement.
Ethics approval(s)Wales REC 5, 03/05/2018, ref: 18/WA/0154
ConditionHip fracture
InterventionParticipants will undergo surgery at the next available opportunity on a planned trauma list. Participants will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The operating surgeon will not be blinded to the allocation. Where possible clinical outcomes will be assessed by blinded assessors. Patients will be kept blinded until the completion of the trial when the blind may be broken.

Group 1: Cemented hemiarthroplasty with low dose single antibiotic cement
Replacement of the femoral head and neck with choice of femoral head and stem. Cement used will be Heraeus Palacos R+G cement (Hanau, Germany) – contains gentamicin 0.5 grams per 40 gram mix of cement.

Group 2: Cemented hemiarthroplasty with high dose dual antibiotic cement
Replacement of the femoral head and neck with choice of femoral head and stem. Cement used will be Heraeus Copal G+C cement (Hanau, Germany) – contains gentamicin 1 g and clindamycin 1 g per 40 gram mix of cement.

Following fixation all patients will undergo a routine rehabilitation prior to discharge from hospital. Research staff will complete the infection-related questions at baseline, and at 4 months (120 days) post-surgery. In addition the following data will be collected:
1. Demographic and baseline characteristics (e.g. age, gender, pre-fracture mobility)
2. Routine 'operation notes' and 'discharge summaries' that include details of patient's diagnosis and treatment, perioperative complications, and discharge details
3. Medical record review for diagnosis of infection
4. Details of admission, assessment and treatment
5. Details of antibiotics use and microbiological reports for reported infections
6. Contact details, including of carers when appropriate
7. Complications and SAEs during the study period

Following their 4-month questionnaire, patients will have completed their participation in the trial and will continue to be treated as per normal standard of care.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureDeep Infection of surgical wound; the trialists will use the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention definition of a “deep surgical site infection”, that is a wound infection involving the tissues deep to the skin that occurs within 90 days of injury. Medical records for all patients will be reviewed by appropriately trained staff for indicators of infection at the time of the patient’s discharge from the research site. In addition, at 120 days post-surgery, the patients will self-report (via telephone interview, electronic media or postal questionnaire) on signs of infections. When potential signs of infection have been found, either at discharge or 120 days, the site will be asked to provide, if available, copies of: any re-operation records for surgery related to the index hip fracture, details of antibiotics prescribed, microbiology reports if samples of the suspected infected tissues around the hip were sent for analysis and imaging reports for any deep imaging that occurred in relation to suspected infection. These data will be collated by the central trial team in Oxford.
Secondary outcome measures1. Mortality recorded at discharge from the research site as well as in the 120-day follow-up. Sites or consultees may also report mortality at any point in the time between discharge and 120 days.
2. Health-related quality of life measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L at baseline and at 120 days post-surgery
3. All complications and surgical interventions related to the index wound will be recorded. These are reported by sites as they become aware of events, as well as by patients, carers or consultees at 4 months (120 days)
4. Antibiotic prescription information will be obtained from the patient, consultee or carer at the 4 months (120 days) follow-up. Should the patient be entered into the trial under nominated consultee agreement and this information not be available from a carer, the trial team may contact the patient’s GP for this information
5. Resistance patterns of infections; all infections identified in the primary endpoint will be assessed for antibiotic resistance profiles by the local microbiology team
6. Resource use; cost data will be obtained from national databases or will be estimated in consultation with the hospital finance department. The cost consequences following discharge, including NHS costs and patients' out-of-pocket expenses will be recorded via a short questionnaire, which will be administered at 4 months (120 days) post-surgery. This will be either by patient or consultee
7. Mobility; the ability to walk indoors and outdoors is rated very highly by patients. It has been included in a recommended ‘core outcome set’ for trials assessing interventions in hip fractures, hence it will be recorded using the CRF. It will be captured at baseline and at 4 months (120 days).
8. Residential status; also captured on CRF. The residential status is also part of the core outcome set for hip fractures and NHFD dataset. It will be captured at baseline and at 4 months (120 days)
Overall study start date15/12/2017
Overall study end date31/12/2021

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 4920; UK Sample Size: 4920
Total final enrolment4936
Participant inclusion criteria1. Aged 60 years or older
2. Intracapsular hip fracture, which in the opinion of the treating surgeon requires acute surgical treatment with a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty
Participant exclusion criteriaPatients will be excluded if they are allergic to gentamicin or clindamycin
Recruitment start date01/08/2018
Recruitment end date31/08/2021

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom
  • United States of America
  • Wales

Study participating centres

John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Musculoskeletal Research Office
Ground Floor, Victoria Building
Leicester
LE1 5WW
United Kingdom
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital
Orthopaedic Research
East Block Level 2
Colney Lane
Norwich
NR4 7UY
United Kingdom
Poole Hospital
Research Dept
Cornelia House
Longfleet Road
Poole
BH15 2JB
United Kingdom
Queen Alexandra Hospital
ED Research Team
Lancaster House
Portsmouth
PO6 3LY
United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
NIHR SRMRC
4th Floor
North Block
Institute of Translational Medicine
Hertiage Building
Birmingham
B15 2TH
United Kingdom
Royal Berkshire Hospital
Research and Development
Level 2 | North Block
London Road
Reading
RG1 5AN
United Kingdom
Princess Royal Hospital
Research & Development
Sussex House
1 Abbey Road
Brighton
BN12 1ES
United Kingdom
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Peacock Hall
Level 2, Room 12
Newcastle Upon Tyne
NE1 4LP
United Kingdom
Southmead Hospital
Trauma & Orthopaedic Research Team
Department of Orthopaedics
Office 6, Gate 18, Level 1
Brunel Building
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
University Hospital Coventry
Trauma & Orthopaedic Research Team
Research & Development
Room ACF40002
4th Floor, West Wing
UHCW, Clifford Bridge Road
Walsgrave
Coventry
CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
Queens Medical Centre
T & O Research Manager
Trauma & Orthopaedic Audit Office
C Floor, West Block, QMC (WC1285)
Nottingham University Hospitals
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
University Hospital Wales
Trauma & Orthopaedics Directorate
Cardiff & Vale University Health Board
Cardiff & Vale Orthopaedic Centre (CAVOC)
University Hospital Llandough
Penlan Road
Penarth
Cardiff
CF64 2XX
United Kingdom
University Hospital Aintree
John Moorehead
Orthopaedic Research Room
Fracture Clinic
Lower Lane
Liverpool
L9 7AL
United Kingdom
Salford Royal Hospital
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom
Morriston Hospital
Heol Maes Eglwys
Morriston
SA6 6NL
United Kingdom
Wythenshawe Hospital
University Hospital of South Manchester
Southmoor Road
Wythenshawe
M23 9LT
United States of America
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Clinical Research Centre
2nd Flor, Area 5
Whinney Heys Road
Blackpool
FY3 8NR
United Kingdom
Ipswich Hospital
The East Suffolk North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Heath Road
Ipswich
IP4 5PD
United Kingdom
James Cook University Hospital
Academic Centre
Marton Road
Middlesbrough
TS4 3BW
United Kingdom
Sandwell General Hospital
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
Sandwell Medical Research Unit
Opposite Diabetes Centre
Lyndon
West Bromwich
B71 4HJ
United Kingdom
Royal Cornwall Hospital
Medical & Surgical Research Team
B16 Knowledge Spa
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Truro
TR1 3HD
United Kingdom
Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital
Wansbeck General Hospital
Woodhorn Lane
Ashington
NE63 9JJ
United Kingdom
Kings College Hospital
Orthopaedic Department
2nd Floor, Hambleden Wing
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 9RS
United Kingdom
Horton General Hospital
Oxford Road
Banbury
OX16 9AL
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

North Tyneside General Hospital
Rake Lane, North Shields
Tyne & Wear
North Shields
NE29 8NH
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)344 811 8111
Email white8-copal@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Website https://www.northumbria.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01gfeyd95

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Heraeus Medical GmbH

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/05/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryPublished as a supplement to the results publication
Publication and dissemination planProtocol will be published after the start of the trial. Planned publication of the results in a high-impact peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planAll data generated or analysed during this study will be included in the subsequent results publication

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article 01/02/2021 14/04/2021 Yes No
Results article 21/06/2023 26/06/2023 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

26/06/2023: Publication reference added.
13/01/2023: Total final enrolment added.
12/01/2023: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/05/2022 to 01/05/2023.
08/11/2021: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall end date was changed from 15/11/2021 to 31/12/2021.
2. The plain English summary was updated to reflect these changes.
14/04/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. The recruitment end date has been changed from 30/04/2021 to 31/08/2021.
2. Publication reference added.
08/07/2020: The following trial participating centres were added: University Hospital Aintree, Salford Royal Hospital, Morriston Hospital, Wythenshawe Hospital, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Ipswich Hospital, James Cook University Hospital, Sandwell General Hospital, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital, Kings College Hospital, Horton General Hospital.
04/06/2020: Recruitment has resumed.
23/04/2020: Due to current public health guidance, recruitment for this study has been paused.
22/03/2019: The condition was updated.
18/07/2018: Internal review.