ISRCTN ISRCTN12883981
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12883981
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) Nil known
Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) Nil known
Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) 265559
Protocol serial number CPMS 43740, IRAS 265559
Sponsor University of Oxford
Funder Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Submission date
02/12/2019
Registration date
10/12/2019
Last edited
02/02/2026
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
There are around 170 ankle fractures each day in the UK. Many of these injuries heal with support in a plaster cast or splint, but some require surgery to restore the natural alignment of the bones and fix them in place with screws and plates. This improves how the ankle works once the fracture has healed. Following surgery for an ankle fracture, patients are commonly told not to walk on the affected leg for 6 weeks in order to allow the bones to heal. Restricting the weight put through the affected leg may reduce the chance of surgical complications such as infection, breakage of the plates and screws, and loss of alignment requiring revision surgery. However, this restriction has been associated with problems such as blood clots, muscle weakness, stiffness, and poor recovery. It is unclear that the traditional 6 weeks period of limited walking is of any benefit. A recent national review found that surgeons gave patients very varied instructions following ankle fracture surgery, indicating that overall, UK surgeons have differing opinions about the best extended treatment pathway. There has been little high-quality research in this area.

This study is asking should patients who have had surgery for an ankle fracture walk on their operated leg soon following surgery or wait 6 weeks before walking on the operated leg. It is a clinical trial, which is the best method to compare treatments to guide the care of patients.

Who can participate?
This study will include adults (aged 18 years or above) undergoing surgery for an ankle fracture.

What does the study involve?
All patients will be treated non-weight-bearing until their 2-week postoperative follow-up visit. They will then be instructed to either begin weight-bearing on the injured leg, or remain non-weight-bearing for an additional 4 weeks. The decision on which instruction they are given will be made by chance using a process called randomisation so that neither patients nor surgeons can influence the choice. All other care will be as per usual treatment. Patients will report how well their ankle is working and their quality of life using questionnaires at intervals over the first year following surgery. Differences in healthcare costs will also be compared. A small sample of patients and staff will also be interviewed to discuss their experience of the trial. These interviews will help understand how and why the different treatments may work and help design future studies.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Early weight-bearing, from two weeks after the operation, may reduce the inconvenience of having to use crutches and reduce immobility, length of hospital stay, and might lead to improved ability to walk, get back to work etc.. However, there is a small chance that putting weight through the ankle at an early stage may lead to the bone moving slightly or the skin around the injury and the incision made for the operation being damaged or causing infection, which might mean further treatment, such as an operation, is required.

Delayed weight-bearing, for up to 6 weeks after the operation, may reduce the risk of the bones slipping out of place, the skin around the injury being damaged and as such a need for further operations. However, it will be more inconvenient and it could lead to increased time off work and other activities. Participants will not be using the calf muscle and might lose some muscle mass and this means it might take longer after the initial 6 weeks to return to usual strength and activities. Finally, although highly unlikely, there may be a slightly increased chance of getting a blood clot in the calf or lung, which could require additional blood-thinning medication.

Where is the study run from?
The University of Oxford, UK

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2019 to November 2022

Who is funding the study?
Research for Patient Benefit Programme, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK

Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Susan Wagland (public), wax@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
2. Mr Chris Bretherton (scientific), christopher.bretherton@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Susan Wagland
Public

Adult trials office
Lvl 3, Kadoorie Centre
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley way
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-5566-0925
Phone +44 (0)1865 227318
Email wax@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
Mr Chris Bretherton
Scientific

Adult trials office
Lvl 3, Kadoorie Centre
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley way
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-9569-0734
Phone +44 (0)1865227318
Email christopher.bretherton@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designMulti-centre prospective randomised non-inferiority clinical trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleWeight Bearing in Ankle Fractures. A randomised clinical trial of weight-bearing following operatively treated ankle fracture
Study acronymWAX
Study objectivesWeight bearing at 2 weeks is not inferior to weight bearing at 6 weeks after surgically repaired unstable ankle fracture.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 01/12/2019, South Central- Oxford A- Health Research Authority (Level 3, Block B, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT; +44 (0)207 104 8041; nrescommittee.southcentral-oxforda@nhs.net), ref: 19/SC/0566
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgically repaired unstable ankle fractures
InterventionEarly-weight bearing vs Delayed weight-bearing.

Initially patients will be instructed to be non-weight bearing in the immediate two weeks following surgery, as per usual clinical care, to allow the soft tissues to recover and wounds to heal. At two weeks, participants will be randomised (online using RRAMP) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by centre and whether they are aged under 60 or 60 and over, to either early weight-bearing (unrestricted weight-bearing group, begin weight-bearing immediately at 2 weeks after their operation) or to delayed weight-bearing (restricted weight-bearing group, wait until 6 weeks after the operation) for a period of four weeks. Participants will be given verbal and standardised written instructions dependant on their randomisation outcome. Both of these weight-bearing strategies are widely used within the NHS and all of the clinical teams in the chosen centres will be familiar with both instructions. At four weeks post-randomisation participants’ weight-bearing status will default back to routine clinical care. Patients will be followed up for four months.

Baseline demographic data and pre-injury functional data using the OMAS instrument will be collected. Participants will also be asked to complete the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L health-related quality-of-life questionnaire to indicate their typical pre-injury health status. At 4 weeks post-randomisation, the clinical team will perform a clinical assessment; participants will be asked to complete the OMAS and a record of any early adverse events made. Additionally, OMAS, EQ-5D-5L, Global rating of change (GRC), Pain self-efficacy questionnaire and Tampa scale of kinesphobia-11, adverse events and resource use questionnaires will be collected at 6 weeks, 4 and 12 months post randomisation.

Data will be collected via the clinical trial IT system REDCap, hosted by the University of Oxford, UK. Baseline data will be directly entered onto the database by the local research team. Participants will be contacted for follow-up using email and/or SMS text message prompts and invited to complete questionnaires through an online link, postal and telephone follow-up will be conducted for those who are not comfortable to, or cannot complete forms online.

A process evaluation will be performed. The main aim of this evaluation will be to identify barriers and facilitators in the delivery of the interventions, look for selection and researcher bias and to understand the generalizability of the trial, through a mixed methods approach. This will include qualitative interviews with staff and participants as well as a quantitative assessment of the characteristics of the sample and fidelity of the interventions. The interviews will be conducted by a student researcher (after sufficient training) and take place over the telephone, in clinic or hospital/university meeting rooms. Patients will be approached at the time of consent to the main trial to see if they would be happy to be contacted for the interview. Patient's who do not wish to take part in the main trial may still consent to be
approached and then complete the interview. All participants completing the interview will sign a separate consent form.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure(s)

Ankle function outcomes measured by the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) at the 4 month follow-up time-point

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. OMAS at 6 weeks and 12 months
2. Health related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at 6 weeks, 4 months and 12 months
3. Resource use, costs and comparative cost utility (The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) at 6 weeks, 4 months and 12 months
4. Difference in risk of adverse events (adverse events)
5. Investigate generalisability, acceptability and mechanism of action of the trial and interventions (CRF's, patient and staff interviews) 6 weeks, 12 months

Completion date18/11/2022

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit100 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration436
Total final enrolment562
Key inclusion criteria1. Age 18 years and above
2. The patient has undergone operative fixation for an unstable ankle fracture
3. Surgery was performed within 14 days of the injury
4. In the opinion of the treating surgeon, the participant might benefit from early weight-bearing
5. Able and willing to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. A lack of protective sensation (e.g. peripheral neuropathy)
2. Inability to adhere to trial procedures
3. Bilateral operatively treated ankle fractures
4. Already in a trial for ankle fracture
5. The patient has received a hindfoot nail to treat index fracture
Date of first enrolment23/12/2019
Date of final enrolment28/10/2021

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England
  • Northern Ireland
  • Wales

Study participating centres

Royal Berkshire Hospital
London Road
Reading
RG1 5AN
England
Salisbury District Hospital
Odstock Road
Salisbury
SP2 8BJ
England
Tunbridge Wells Hospital
The Tunbridge Wells Hospital
Tonbridge Road
Pembury
Tunbridge Wells
TN2 4QJ
England
University Hospital Lewisham
Lewisham High Street
London
SE13 6LH
England
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust
Combe Park
Bath
BA1 3NG
England
Ysbyty Gwynedd
Penrhosgarnedd
Bangor
LL57 2PW
England
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Walsgrave General Hospital
Clifford Bridge Road
Coventry
CV2 2DX
England
Dorset County Hospital
Williams Avenue
Dorchester
DT1 2JY
England
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
Great Western Road
Gloucester
GL1 3NN
England
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
England
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Hamstel Road
Harlow
CM20 1QX
England
Princess Royal University Hospital
Farnborough Common
Orpington
BR6 8ND
England
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Southwick Hill Road
Cosham
Portsmouth
PO6 3LY
England
Royal Derby Hospital
Uttoxeter Road
Derby
DE22 3NE
England
Royal Preston Hospital
Sharoe Green Lane
Fulwood
Preston
PR2 9HT
England
Royal Victoria Hospital
Radnor Park Avenue
Folkestone
CT19 5BN
England
Salford Royal Hospital
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
England
Southampton
Southampton General Hospital
Tremona Road
Southampton
SO16 6YD
England
Wexham Park Hospital
Wexham Street
Wexham
Slough
SL2 4HL
England
East Surrey Hospital
Canada Avenue
Redhill
RH1 5RH
England
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital
Aldermaston Road
Basingstoke
RG24 9NA
England
Royal Cornwall Hospital
Treliske
Truro
TR1 3LJ
England
Conquest Hospital
The Ridge
St. Leonards-on-sea
TN37 7RD
England
University Hospital Llandough
Penlan Road
Llandough
Penarth
CF64 2XX
Wales
Peterborough City Hospital
Edith Cavell Campus
Bretton Gate
Bretton
Peterborough
PE3 9GZ
England
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
Queens Medical Centre
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
England
Craigavon Area Hospital
Lurgan Rd
Craigavon
BT63 5QQ
Northern Ireland
William Harvey Hospital
Kennington Road
Willesborough
Ashford
TN24 0LZ
England

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request
wax@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 04/06/2024 11/06/2024 Yes No
Protocol article 09/08/2021 12/10/2021 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No
Other publications Co-design of rehabilitation intervention: healthcare professionals 23/01/2025 02/02/2026 Yes No
Other publications Co-design of rehabilitation intervention: patients 02/04/2025 02/02/2026 Yes No
Study website 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

02/02/2026: Publication references added.
11/06/2024: Publication reference added.
10/05/2024: The intention to publish date was changed from 30/04/2023 to 01/06/2024.
13/02/2023: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall end date was changed from 28/02/2023 to 18/11/2022.
2. The total final enrolment was added.
3. The participant level data sharing statement was added.
4. The contact was updated.
10/02/2023: The contact confirmed the record is up to date.
12/10/2021: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The trial website was added.
09/02/2021: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 28/02/2021 to 28/10/2021.
2. The overall end date was changed from 30/06/2022 to 28/02/2023.
3. The intention to publish date was changed from 30/06/2022 to 30/04/2023.
4. The plain English summary was updated to reflect these changes.
29/06/2020: The following changes have been made:
1. Recruitment has resumed.
2. The plain English summary has been updated to reflect the previous change in the public contact.
16/04/2020: Due to current public health guidance, recruitment for this study has been paused.
20/03/2020: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment start date
2. The public contact was changed.
3. The trial participating centres "Altnagelvin Area Hospital, University Hospital of Wales, Medway Maritime Hospital" were removed and "East Surrey Hospital, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Conquest Hospital, University Hospital Llandough, Peterborough City Hospital, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Queen's Medical Centre, Craigavon Hospital, William Harvey Hospital" were added.
10/12/2019: Trial’s existence confirmed by South Central- Oxford A- Health Research Authority