A randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether use of intrapleural urokinase aids the drainage of multi-septated pleural effusion compared to placebo

ISRCTN ISRCTN12852177
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12852177
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
24/04/2008
Registration date
05/06/2008
Last edited
20/09/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/trials/trials-search/trial-looking-using-urokinase-help-drain-fluid-around-lung-time3-uk

Contact information

Dr Najib Rahman
Scientific

UKCRC Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit
University of Oxford
Respiratory Medicine
Churchill Hospital
Oxford
OX3 7LJ
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designMulti-centre randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please contact the Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Trials Unit at +44 (0)1865 225205 to request a patient information sheet.
Scientific titleAdjuvant urokinase in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion: The third Therapeutic Intervention in Malignant Effusion trial
Study acronymTIME3-UK
Study hypothesisA randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether use of intrapleural urokinase improves breathlessness and decreases the proportion of patients requiring further pleural fluid drainage to control breathlessness in subjects with septated/loculated malignant pleural effusions who are undergoing talc pleurodesis, compared to placebo.
Ethics approval(s)Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee A, 20/03/2009, ref: 09/H0604/5
ConditionMalignant pleural effusions
InterventionTreatment (urokinase) arm: Intra-pleural urokinase (100,000 IU in 30 ml normal saline) administered 12 hourly for a total of 3 doses.

Placebo arm: Intra-pleural urokinase placebo (in 30 ml normal saline) administered 12 hourly for a total of 3 doses.

All patients suitable for talc pleurodesis will receive this treatment after pleural drainage facilitated by the trial medication. For any patient where there is a contraindication to the administration of intrapleural talc, an alternative pleurodesis agent may be used.

Total duration of follow-up: 12 months post-randomisation
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase III
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Urokinase
Primary outcome measure1. Breathlessness quantified from visual analogue scales. The primary outcome will be the change in mean daily visual analogue scale (VAS) score defining breathlessness over 28 days following randomisation. A daily VAS score will be obtained at a similar time each day to assess how breathless each patient has felt over the preceding 24 hours.

The minimum clinically significant changes in the VAS scores have been established based on pilot data from previous studies determining the improvement in breathlessness associated with complete pleural fluid drainage with a permanent indwelling catheter. These are used in the power calculations. VAS methodology has been shown to be robust and reproducible. Patients who are known to be unable to record VAS scales (particularly the visually impaired) will be excluded (see Participants - exclusion criteria).

Added 09/08/2016:
2. After adjuvant urokinase/placebo treatment, all patients will have a sterile 4 g talc slurry pleurodesis. Pleurodesis will be performed with talc graded to exclude majority of <10 µm particles to minimise toxicity. The hypothesis is that the urokinase treatment will improve pleural drainage such that subsequent pleurodesis is more effective.

To assess whether adjuvant urokinase has improved the efficacy rate of pleurodesis, the failure rate of pleurodesis will be defined by the need for further pleural intervention within 28 days of randomisation. Recurrence of pleural fluid on imaging (e.g., chest radiograph or ultrasound) which is not causing sufficient breathlessness/pain to require further drainage will not be deemed pleurodesis failure.
Secondary outcome measures1. Radiographic improvement in the area of the pleural effusion (measured as the difference in the proportion of the ipsilateral hemithorax occupied by the pleural effusion opacity on chest radiograph) on day three (the day of pleurodesis)
2. Total volume of pleural fluid drained
3. The proportion of patients requiring a further pleural fluid drainage to control breathlessness at 3 months
4. Self reported health status ('quality of life'), quantified from standard questionnaires at each trial assessment: Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C-30)
5. Health care costs (from health care utilisation and cost utility analysis from EQ-5D)
Overall study start date01/10/2008
Overall study end date30/06/2014

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants71
Participant inclusion criteria1. Both males and females
2. A clinically confident diagnosis of pleural malignancy defined as:
2.1 Histocytologically proven pleural malignancy, or
2.2. Otherwise unexplained exudative pleural effusion in the context of histocytologically proven cancer elsewhere
2. A significant (>25% hemithorax area) multi-loculated or multi-septated pleural effusion (residual effusion on chest radiograph despite the presence of a patent in-situ chest tube)
3. Malignant pleural effusion requiring drainage and pleurodesis for symptom control
4. Written informed consent
Participant exclusion criteria1. Age <18 years
2. Expected survival <28 days
3. Previous pneumonectomy on the side of the effusion
4. Positive ipsilateral pleural fluid gram stain or bacterial culture in the previous month
5. Previously received intra-pleural fibrinolytic agents into this effusion
6. Known sensitivity to urokinase
7. Coincidental stroke, major haemorrhage or major trauma
8. Major surgery in the previous 5 days
9. Chylothorax
10. Total blood white cell count <1.0 x 10^9
11. Patients who are pregnant or lactating
12. Irreversible bleeding diathesis or platelet count <100 x 10^9
13. Irreversible visual impairment
14. Inability to give informed consent or comply with the protocol
Recruitment start date01/09/2009
Recruitment end date30/06/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

UKCRC Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit
Oxford
OX3 7LJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Oxford (UK)
University/education

Clinical Trials and Research Governance (CTRG)
Manor House
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.ox.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/052gg0110

Funders

Funder type

Government

Grant application submitted to the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) (UK). Decision pending as of 01/05/2008.

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 15/02/2018 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

20/09/2017: Publication reference added.
09/08/2016: Changed number of participants from 126 to 71. Have amended outcome measures (see relevant section for details)
22/02/2011: The overall trial end date was changed from 01/10/2010 to 31/12/2012.