Ambulance feasibility study of a rapid blood test for stroke

ISRCTN ISRCTN12803526
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12803526
IRAS number 332951
Secondary identifying numbers REC-292, IRAS 332951
Submission date
29/04/2024
Registration date
03/05/2024
Last edited
04/06/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a highly successful treatment for acute ischemic stroke triggered by a blockage in a large blood vessel (large vessel occlusion; LVO). Approximately 15,000 ischaemic strokes are eligible for MT in the UK each year. With the growing technological advances in both arterial imaging and thrombectomy techniques, this number will increase in the future. Due to the proximal site of arterial occlusion in LVO, these strokes tend to cause severe disability or death if untreated. Emergency treatment of LVO by MT reduces the chance of long-term disability and mortality and earlier treatment produces significantly better outcomes and health care savings, but optimising delivery faces many challenges due to:
1. Stroke-like symptoms that mimic LVO can also be due to lacunar stroke from small vessel infarction, intracerebral haemorrhage, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and non-vascular conditions such as seizures and migraines. Ruling in LVO from such a complex cohort of ‘suspected stroke’ patients currently requires specialist assessment and brain imaging only performed in-hospital;
2. Less than a third of stroke units are regional MT providers, meaning that many patients are initially taken to their local stroke unit, and then transferred to a thrombectomy centre. This leads to a median treatment delay of 2 hours by the time patients are identified and transferred between sites, with every 1-hour of delay increasing the chance of disability and dependence by 20%.

Currently, no tools are used in the pre-hospital to identify LVO and redirect suspected patients to regional MT providers.Tools to help ambulance clinicians diagnose LVO and transport patients immediately to a thrombectomy centre are vital.

This clinical feasibility study aims at assessing the feasibility of using the LVOne test during ambulance clinical assessment. LVOne is a new finger-prick blood test which is designed to help ambulance clinicians diagnose ischaemic strokes.
The test kit consists of 2 separate blood tests. One of them measures D-dimer. The D-dimer levels are high when a stroke is associated with a blood clot, i.e. ischaemic stroke. The second test measures Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) which is elevated when patients have haemorrhagic stroke (i.e. brain bleed). You will receive training and guidance on how to use and interpret the LVOne test.
Prior studies have shown that the LVOne test has 90% accuracy in identifying ischaemic strokes.

The purpose of the RADIOS study is to determine whether the LVOne test can be used by ambulance staff to diagnose patients with ischaemic strokes. If they can, this could see these stroke patients being assessed before arriving at hospital.
However, patients in this study will be assessed and treated in the standard way, and the results of the LVOne test will not be acted upon.
Future studies will explore use of the LVOne test in ambulance setting to reduce treatment times for stroke patients and improve their recovery.

Who can participate?
All patients evaluated by ambulance clinicians for a new acute suspected stroke will be evaluated for study eligibility.

What does the study involve?
The study includes performing the LVOne test, which, from the patient perspective, involves collecting a fingerstick blood sample and testing with the device.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no benefits for the participants and we do not expect any significant risk associated to the test procedure as this study is observational and the intervention involves a fingerstick blood sample which is known to be very safe.

Where is the study run from?
Pockit diagnostics Ltd, T/A Upfront diagnostics (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2024 to September 2024

Who is funding the study?
Pockit diagnostics Ltd, T/A Upfront diagnostics (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Edoardo Gaude, edoardo.gaude@pockitdx.co.uk

Contact information

Dr Edoardo Gaude
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator

University Of Cambridge CRUK
Robinson Way
CAMBRIDGE
CB2 0RE
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-8523-7792
Phone +44 1223 363608
Email edoardo.gaude@pockitdx.co.uk

Study information

Study designProspective feasibility cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Paramedicine
Study typeDiagnostic, Other
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request participant information sheet
Scientific titleRapid Ambulance DIagnosis Of Stroke (RADIOS): a pre-hospital feasibility study
Study acronymRADIOS
Study hypothesisAmbulance clinicians find the LVOne test feasible to use during ambulance assessment.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 07/05/2024, Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (Equinox House, City Link, Nottingham, NG2 4LA, United Kingdom; +44 207 1048098; cambridgecentral.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 23/EE/0226

ConditionSuspected stroke
InterventionThe intervention associated to this study is performing the LVOne test, which, from the patient perspective, involves collecting a fingerstick blood sample and testing with the device. The total observation is limited to the duration of in-hospital stay and there is no follow-up.

The LVOne test consists of two portable lateral flow assays: assay 1 measures blood D-dimer concentration and assay 2 measures blood GFAP concentration (Upfront diagnostics). The main analysis will include ambulance clinicians’ opinions on the feasibility of the LVOne test during routine ambulance visits for the pre-hospital evaluation of LVO stroke.
Intervention typeDevice
Pharmaceutical study type(s)Not Applicable
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)LVOne
Primary outcome measureExpert opinions on the feasibility of the LVOne test during routine ambulance visits. The method used to collect this data is qualitative evaluation in the form of a questionnaire.
Secondary outcome measuresThere are no secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date29/04/2024
Overall study end date30/09/2024

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit99 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants30
Participant inclusion criteria1. Attended by study trained ambulance clinician
2. Evaluated for suspected acute stroke
3. Within 6 hours of symptom onset
4. Age >18 years
5. Local hospital is Cambridge University Hospital (or other thrombectomy-capable hospital)
Participant exclusion criteria1. Witnessed seizure at presentation
2. Hypoglycaemia, (blood glucose <3mmol/l)
3. Severe frailty or limited life expectancy <6 months
4. Patient is not conveyed to Cambridge University Hospital (or other thrombectomy-capable hospital)
Recruitment start date01/07/2024
Recruitment end date30/09/2024

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge Biomedical Campus
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust
Unit 3
Whiting Way
Melbourn
Royston
SG8 6NA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Pockit diagnostics Ltd, T/A Upfront diagnostics
Industry

CRUK Cambridge Institute
Cambridge
CB2 0RE
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 1223330808
Email elizabeth.warburton5@nhs.net
Website https://upfrontdiagnostics.com/

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Pockit diagnostics Ltd, T/A Upfront diagnostics

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/03/2025
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planResults may be printed in public medical journals, presented at scientific conferences and meetings. No personally identifiable data will be released in publications or to third parties.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study will be available upon request from Edoardo Gaude, edoardo@upfrontdiagnostics.com

Editorial Notes

04/06/2024: Ethics approval details added.
29/04/2024: Trial's existence confirmed by Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee.