Management of low back pain in occupational health care using an approach that considers biological, psychological, and social factors

ISRCTN ISRCTN11875357
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11875357
Secondary identifying numbers 79/2017 (protocol number of the Ethics Committee of the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District)
Submission date
22/04/2019
Registration date
13/05/2019
Last edited
19/12/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Low back pain (LBP) is a complex condition in which biological, psychological, and social factors impact on both the experience of back pain and associated disability. For the vast majority of people with LBP, it is not possible to accurately identify the specific cause. Most people with new episodes of LBP recover quickly; however, recurrence is common and in a small proportion LBP becomes persistent and disabling.
In 2005, a multidimensional biopsychosocially oriented approach to assessment and management strategy LBP was proposed. This approach broadly focuses on personalised pain education, fear reduction, functional activation and adopting healthy lifestyle behaviours for people where serious pathology has been ruled out. The dose of the intervention is tailored to the patient presentation. This cognitive functional approach has been shown to demonstrate superior outcomes compared with the best evidence-based usual care strategy, consisting of manual therapy and exercises, at 12-month follow-up.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether a biopsychosocially oriented approach to LBP leads to improvement of patients’ disability at 1 year compared to usual care in occupational health care units. We will also evaluate whether this approach is implemented in the intervention group units 1 year after the recruitment of the last patient and we will interview qualitatively the professionals of the intervention units in order to describe facilitators and barriers to the new treatment approach in occupational health care.

Who can participate?
All patients 18-65 years of age contacting health care due LBP with or without radicular pain were included in the study.

What does the study involve?
Patients will either be treated using the Start Back Tool or receive treatment as usual depending on the health care unit that they visit. Participating requires 20-min time for answering the web-based questionnaire four times over 3 years.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Patients participating the study are given new knowledge about their pain, which enables improvement of low back pain management. There are no risks for individuals with participation to this study.

Where is the study run from?
Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Finland.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2017 to November 2018

Who is funding the study?
The Finnish Work Environment Fund (Työsuojelurahasto)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Jaro Karppinen (scientific), jaro.karppinen@oulu.fi

Contact information

Prof Jaro Karppinen
Scientific

BOX 5000
Oulu
90014
Finland

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-2158-6042
Phone +358-414462859
Email jaro.karppinen@oulu.fi

Study information

Study designCluster randomized controlled study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designCluster randomised trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet (available only in Finnish).
Scientific titleEffectiveness of biopsychosocially oriented management of low back pain in occupational health care
Study acronymBack works
Study hypothesisThe aim of this study is to investigate whether a biopsychosocially oriented approach to LBP leads to improvement of patients’ disability at 1 year compared to usual care in occupational health care units. We will also evaluate whether this approach is implemented in the intervention group units 1 year after the recruitment of the last patient and we will interview qualitatively the professionals of the intervention units in order to describe facilitators and barriers to the new treatment approach in occupational health care.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 19/09/2017, Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Oulu (PPSHP:n alueellinen eettinen toimikunta, Yhtymähallinto N5 (1 krs.), PL 10, 90029 OYS, Finland; +358 40 773 1529; minna.makiniemi@ppshp.fi) ref: 79/2017
ConditionLow back pain
InterventionImplementation of classification-based biopsychosocial approach for low back pain patients in occupational health care.

Professionals
The intervention consists of education of professionals with in-house courses and web-based material that enhanced adherence to the biopsychosocial individualized approach for LBP care, evidence-based information for patients (using the new patient information leaflet), avoidance of unnecessary imaging and harmful messages. To help utilize this approach participants were taught to use SBT (STarT Back Screening Tool) and the short version of ÖMPSQ (Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire) as screening tools for LBP patients. We started with a 4-day training in September 2017 with the involvement of the world leading pain psychologist, Prof. Steven Linton. Additionally, an experienced trainer, musculoskeletal physiotherapist, Kasper Ussing from Denmark, guided the study physiotherapists (PT). This training consisted of the theoretical basis of biopsychosocial approach in low back pain management, pain education, psychological risk factors, physical factors and behavioral responses to pain, interview and assessment, and tailored individualized management for LBP. Live patient demonstrations, clinical case problem solving and role plays were used to enhance the learning. Two experienced Finnish PT’s (Mikko Lausmaa and Riikka Holopainen) supported the implementation by 1-2 coaching visits to each intervention unit. Additionally, we delivered a written educational package to other professionals participating in treatment of LBP patients in the participating units (nurses, psychologists).
Professionals were instructed to use SBT systematically and to make individual care plans for all LBP patients according to the risk profile. The patient education booklet, which is based on the biopsychosocial model, delivers evidence-based information on etiology of LBP and appropriate imaging to patients and also reminds professionals of the biopsychosocial model of LBP. The booklet is translated to Finnish. A two-days booster session was organized in June 2018.

Patient level
All LBP patients received the patient education booklet. Patients were classified to low-, moderate- or high-risk groups during the first visit in health care based on the SBT. Physicians and physiotherapists were instructed to plan the individual treatment process according to risk classification. The low-risk group: advice on pain medication if needed and patient education booklet based on biopsychosocial model. Medium-risk group: an evaluation by a physiotherapist in addition to the low-risk group intervention. High-risk group: similar treatment protocol as medium-risk patients but with emphasis on psychosocial factors and minimal delay for the therapy (preferably less than one week). For all patients, physiotherapists were supposed to evaluate patients’ pain, fears and maladaptive behaviors in addition to clinical examination and patient advice. Physiotherapy was supposed to be individualized and biopsychosocially oriented. The number of physiotherapy contacts was not limited but rather physiotherapists were advised to construct individual care plan taking into account patient´s ability/disability, possible barriers for recovery and personalized goals. Co-occurring symptoms and comorbidities were told to be taken into consideration and treated if needed. The physiotherapists were allowed to refer patients to other professionals such as occupational psychologists if needed.

Groups are formed using cluster randomization. One cluster is one health care unit or health care area. Participants who visit the intervention health care unit, are allocated to the intervention arm. Participants who visit control health care unit are automatically allocated to the control arm.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureChange in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to 12-month follow-up.
Secondary outcome measures1. Pain and disability:
1.1 Oswestry Disability Index, change from baseline to 3-month follow-up
1.2 Roland Morris disability questionnaire change from baseline to 12-month follow-up
1.3 PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) (short form 20a) change from baseline to 3- and 12-month follow-ups
1.4 Frequency of LBP during past 3 months change from baseline to 3- and 12-month follow-ups
1.5 LBP intensity (NRS, numerical rating scale) during past week change from baseline to 3- and 12-month follow-ups
1.6 Leg pain intensity (NRS) during past week change from baseline to 3- and 12-month follow-ups
1.7 SBT (STarT Back Tool) change from baseline to 12-month follow-up.
2. Health-related quality of life: EQ-5D (EuroQol five dimensions) change from baseline to 12-month follow-up.
3. Direct costs:
3.1 Physician visits during past year
3.2 Physiotherapist visits during past year
3.3 Nurse visits during past year
3.4 Other health care professional visits (e.g. psychologist) during past year
3.5 Imaging due to LBP (x-ray/MRI/CT) during past year
3.6 Pain medication over the first year and 3 years; Back operations and other invasive procedures.
4. Indirect costs
4.1 Days on sick leave during past year (LBP-related and all)
4.2 Disability pensions over the first year and at 3 years
Overall study start date23/01/2017
Overall study end date31/12/2025

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit65 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsAccording to power calculation (in a cluster randomized design), to obtain a 20% difference in the primary outcome (ODI) at 1 year with 80% power, a sample size of 600 is needed
Total final enrolment315
Participant inclusion criteria1. 18 - 65 years of age
2. LBP with or without radicular pain
3. Signed consent form
Participant exclusion criteria1. Age under 18 or over 65 years
2. Serious cause for LBP or LBP requiring urgent care
Recruitment start date25/09/2017
Recruitment end date29/11/2018

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Finland

Study participating centres

Attendo Haukipudas
Teollisuustie 1
Haukipudas
90830
Finland
Attendo Imatra
Tainionkoskentie 68
Imatra
55120
Finland
Attendo Kemi
Rivinkarintie 68 C
Kemi
94800
Finland
Attendo Kempele
Voimatie 6 D
Kempele
90440
Finland
Attendo Kerava
Kultasepänkatu 8
Kerava
04250
Finland
Attendo Liminka
Kauppakatu 2
Liminka
91900
Finland
Attendo Loimaa
Heimolinnankatu 10
Loimaa
32200
Finland
Attendo Oulu Nuottasaari
Paperitehtaantie 1
Oulu
90120
Finland
Attendo Rovaniemi
Valtakatu 11
Rovaniemi
96100
Finland
Attendo Valkeakoski
Sääksmäentie 1
Valkeakoski
37600
Finland
Attendo Vantaa
Vernissakatu 6
Vantaa
01300
Finland
Mehiläinen Espoo
Mehiläinen Espoo Leppävaara
Lääkärikeskus, Työterveysasema
Hevosenkenkä 3, Panorama Tower
Espoo
02600
Finland
Mehiläinen Espoo Matinkylä
Lääkärikeskus, Työterveysasema
Piispanportti 10 A, 3. krs
Espoo
02200
Finland
Mehiläinen Helsinki Forum
Lääkärikeskus, Työterveysasema
Mannerheimintie 20 B, 4. krs
Helsinki
00100
Finland
Mehiläinen Helsinki Töölö
Lääkärikeskus, Sairaala, Työterveysasema
Pohjoinen Hesperiankatu 17
Helsinki
00260
Finland
Mehiläinen Jyväskylä
Kauppakatu 35
Jyväskylä
40100
Finland
Mehiläinen Kokkola
Rantakatu 2 B
Kokkola
67100
Finland
Mehiläinen Kuopio
Kauppakatu 39 A
Kuopio
70100
Finland
Mehiläinen Oulu
Lääkärikeskus, Sairaala, Työterveysasema
Kauppurienkatu 9
Oulu
90100
Finland
Mehiläinen Turku Artukainen Työterveys
Työterveysasema
Pansiontie 45
Turku
20210
Finland
Mehiläinen Turku Kauppiaskatu
Lääkärikeskus, Työterveysasema
Kauppiaskatu 8
Turku
20100
Finland
Mehiläinen Neo Turku
Lääkärikeskus, Sairaala, Työterveysasema
Joukahaisenkatu 6, NEO-talo
Turku
20520
Finland
Työterveys Virta Lakeus
Työterveysasema Liminka
Liminganraitti 10
C-talo 2. kerros
Liminka
91900
Finland
Työterveys Virta Oulu, Hallituskatu (Teletalo)
Työterveysasema Hallituskatu (Teletalo)
Hallituskatu 36 A, 5. krs.
Oulu
90100
Finland
Työterveys Virta Oulu, Rehapolis
Työterveysasema Rehapolis
Kiviharjunlenkki 6, 2 krs.
Oulu
90220
Finland
Terveystalo Kouvola
Tommolankatu 9
Kouvola
45130
Finland
Terveystalo Oulu
Albertinkatu 16/Sepänkatu 17
Oulu
90100
Finland
Terveystalo Tampere
Rautatienkatu 27
Tampere
33100
Finland
Terveystalo Tampere Tullintori
Hammareninkatu 2 B, 4 krs
Tampere
33100
Finland
Terveystalo Lahti Työterveys
Hämeenkatu Hämeenkatu 15
Lahti
15110
Finland
Terveystalo Varkaus
Terveystalo Varkaus Wredenkatu Wredenkatu 2
Varkaus
78250
Finland
Terveystalo Varkaus
Linjurikatu Linjurikatu 12
Varkaus
78200
Finland
Työplus Kokkola
Mariankatu 26
Kokkola
67200
Finland
Pohjola Sairaala Oulu
Kiilakivenkuja 1
Oulu
90250
Finland

Sponsor information

Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu
University/education

Box 5000
Oulu
90014
Finland

Phone +358 294 48 0000
Email university.of.oulu@oulu.fi
Website https://www.oulu.fi/medicine/elite
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03yj89h83

Funders

Funder type

Government

Työsuojelurahasto
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Finnish Work Environment Fund, Työsuojelurahasto Arbetarskyddsfonden, Työsuojelurahasto | Helsinki
Location
Finland

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/12/2024
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planThe results of the trial will be published in peer-reviewed international journals. The results will be disseminated through conventional media and social media.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available due to national regulations.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Interim results article interim results 30/12/2019 02/01/2020 Yes No
Results article 13/04/2021 15/12/2021 Yes No
Protocol article 04/03/2021 06/11/2023 Yes No

Editorial Notes

19/12/2024: The contact confirmed the record is up to date.
06/11/2023: Publication reference added. The intention to publish date was changed from 31/05/2020 to 31/12/2024.
15/12/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
02/01/2020: Publication reference added.
24/04/2019: Trial’s existence confirmed by Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Oulu.