ISRCTN ISRCTN10977996
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10977996
IRAS number 327879
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 59777, IRAS 327879
Submission date
17/05/2024
Registration date
17/05/2024
Last edited
17/05/2024
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Recent studies have shown that if a woman has had a caesarean section in labour (when the cervix is opening) she is more likely to have a premature baby in a future pregnancy. In women who have had an in-labour caesarean section there is a 5-10% chance of a preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy.
For women who have had an in-labour caesarean section, which was then followed by a preterm birth or mid-trimester loss, early birth is even more likely in subsequent pregnancies. Currently it is not known which treatments are most effective to stop this happening.
These women should be referred to specialist preterm clinics, which will offer them ultrasound monitoring of the length of their cervix, and they may or may not also be offered a cervical cerclage, although there are currently no national guidelines about this. This is a small surgical procedure where a stitch is placed around the cervix through the vagina (transvaginal cerclage). A cerclage can also be placed higher up, through an abdominal procedure involving a cut in the tummy (transabdominal cerclage). This procedure is a longer operation with more recovery time and means that any future babies will need to be born by caesarean section.
Both types of cerclage are offered as standard care to women at high risk of preterm birth. Although transvaginal cerclages are more straightforward, transabdominal cerclages might be more effective because they are above any damage that might have been caused during a previous caesarean section.

Who can participate?
Women who have had a preterm birth or mid-trimester loss (a loss between 14 and 24 weeks of pregnancy) after a previous caearean section in labour

What does the study involve?
Participants will be allocated to one of two treatments: a vaginally-placed cervical stitch or an abdominally-placed cervical stitch, performed before 14 weeks of pregnancy. Some women will join the study before pregnancy, in this group the abdominally-placed stitch will be sited before they get pregnant and the vaginal stitch before 14 weeks in the next pregnancy.
With both stitches participants are followed up in a prematurity clinic with regular transvaginal scanning. If the cervix becomes short participants may be admitted to hospital or offered other treatments (such as a steroid injection to help the baby’s lungs mature, and/or putting in an additional stitch if the cervix opens). These may be offered if there is a high chance the baby may be born very early.
The researchers will ask your permission to look at participants' medical notes after delivery to find out what happened. They may also save some scan images of the cervix taken in the prematurity clinic.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Taking part in the study may not have any direct benefit to participants now. However, the results of this study might help to improve care in any future pregnancies as well as other women, and to reduce the number of babies being born too early.
Having a cervical stitch inserted is a relatively common procedure and is known to help some women. Risks of both treatments include post-operative pain, infection and bleeding. The uncommon risks (occurring in 1 out of 1000) include tearing of the cervix or bladder. The obstetrician would generally be able to repair any tearing to the cervix immediately. A tear to the bladder would require another operation by a urologist (a medical doctor with specialist training in problems of the urinary tract). Both would require a few extra days in hospital. If the doctor is worried about infection, a swab may be taken from the vagina and, if there is evidence of infection, participants may be given a course of antibiotics. While it is likely that either of the cerclages will reduce the chance of miscarriage or preterm birth, they will not entirely eliminate the possibility.

Where is the study run from?
St Thomas' Hospital (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2023 to October 2026

Who is funding the study?
1. Action Research Medical (UK)
2. Borne (UK)

Who is the main contact?
above-study@kcl.a.c.uk

Contact information

Prof Andrew Shennan
Public, Scientific

Women's and Children's Department
10th Floor
St Thomas Hospital Westminster
Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-5273-3132
Phone +44 (0)20 7188 7188
Email andrew.shennan@kcl.ac.uk
Dr Laura van der Krogt
Public, Scientific

Women's and Children's Department
10th Floor
St Thomas Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0009-0004-2040-0375
Phone +44 (0)20 7188 7188
Email laura.c.van_der_krogt@kcl.ac.uk
Dr Jenny Carter
Public, Scientific

Women's and Children's Department
10th Floor
St Thomas Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7188 7188
Email jenny.carter@kcl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomized; Interventional; Design type: Treatment, Surgery
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet 45491_PIS_GroupA_v3.0.pdf
Scientific titleCerclage after Caesarean: a randomised controlled trial to assess the optimal preventative management for preterm birth secondary to caesarean section damage (ABOVE)
Study acronymABOVE
Study hypothesisTransabdominal cerclage (TAC) will be more effective than transvaginal cerclage (TVC) in reducing mid-trimester pregnancy loss (MTL) and spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) in women with experience of MTL/spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) after in-labour caesarean section (CS).
Ethics approval(s)Approval 15/05/2024, North West - Preston Research Ethics Committee (2 Redman Place Stratford, London, E20 1JQ, UK; +44 (0)2071048364; preston.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 24 /NW/0093
ConditionPreterm birth secondary to caesarean section
InterventionABOVE is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing TAC or TVC as a preventative strategy for sPTB in women with a history of sPTB or MTL after an in-labour caesarean section.

Participants will be allocated to either Group A or Group B depending on whether they are already pregnant or planning a pregnancy. The trial is separately powered for these two groups; Group A: in pregnancy and Group B: pre-conception.

160 participants with complete data in total (80/group) with a history of term CS in labour, followed by a subsequent pregnancy loss or sPTB (defined as MTL between 14+0-23+6 weeks or sPTB <30 weeks), either planning a pregnancy, or <14 weeks pregnant <14 weeks pregnant (Group A) or planning a pregnancy (Group B), will be recruited. To allow for loss to follow up, and Group B participants not becoming pregnant within the 18 recruitment period.

Eligible women referred to specialist preterm birth services, either for pre-pregnancy counselling or pregnancy surveillance, will be offered the opportunity to take part in this trial. Pregnant participants (<14 weeks gestation) will be allocated to Group A, while women planning a pregnancy will be allocated to Group B.

Participants will be randomised (1:1) through the ABOVE trial database, which will be hosted within the Medscinet PCN Database (https://www.medscinet.net/ukpcn; REC reference 22/ES/01; IRAS 308157). Women will be randomised to one of the two preventative treatments: 1) TAC, or 2) TVC

It is important to separately evaluate pre-conception and in-pregnancy TACs. The suture can be placed higher pre-conception and this may provide better support around scar weakness. Efficacy could therefore be different in these populations so separately powered trials are planned.

Once randomisation has occurred, the allocated procedure will be arranged. A cervical cerclage will be inserted. The choice of cerclage insertion technique and anaesthesia will be at the local clinician’s discretion with all details recorded on the trial database. Participants in Group A will have the cerclage (TAC or TVC) inserted prior to 14 weeks’
gestation, usually under regional anaesthetic. Group B participants allocated to TAC will have the procedure placed pre-conceptually and those allocated to TVC will have it placed before 14 weeks' gestation (depending on the time point at study entry and randomisation). TACs are performed as as an open or laparoscopic procedure under either regional or general anaesthetic, requiring an inpatient stay of up to 3 days. TVCs will be performed at the participant’s local maternity unit with the insertion technique and anaesthesia according to the clinician’s discretion and local practices. TACs will usually remain in-situ (to support any future pregnancies) while TVCs are removed at around 37 weeks’ gestation. TACs are more specialised procedures and so, if unavailable locally, they may be carried out in tertiary specialist units. The time frame between randomisation and study procedure is flexible from site to site, depending on theatre list availability, although all procedures must be carried out before 14 weeks’ gestation.

There will be no additional research visits, and all preterm care will continue according to local participating site protocols.

Demographic, ongoing preterm surveillance (including cervical length measurements) and outcome data will be collected by recruiting sites from hospital electronic records and entered directly into the study database. Participant identifiers (initials, date of birth, hospital and NHS number) are kept on a separate but linked Medscinet database which is only accessible to authorised site users.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureThe occurrence of mid-trimester pregnancy loss or spontaneous preterm birth before 30 weeks of gestation, collected from the patient's medical records
Secondary outcome measuresMaternal:
1. Admission to hospital for symptoms of threatened preterm labour
2. Administration of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation
3. Administration of magnesium sulphate for fetal cerebral protection.
4. Transfer to other hospitals for neonatal cot availability (in-utero transfer)
5. Time between intervention and delivery
6. Requirement for additional emergency/rescue cerclage
7. Serious complications occurring as a result of trial intervention: bladder injury, bowel injury, intraoperative rupture of membranes, cervical tear, hysterectomy
8. Maternal sepsis
9. Admission to ITU
10. Maternal death

Neonatal:
1. Gestation at birth
2. Birthweight
3. Apgar scores (if available)
4. Days before discharge home (up to 28 days)
5. Admission to neonatal unit
6. Neonatal infection
7. In utero fetal death after 14 weeks
8. Stillbirth
9. Neonatal death

Collected from the patient's medical records at time of birth unless stated otherwise
Overall study start date01/10/2023
Overall study end date01/10/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit16 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 243; UK Sample Size: 243
Participant inclusion criteriaWomen will be eligible for the trial if they are:
1. Willing and able to give informed consent
2. Aged 16 years or above
3. Have had a previous term in-labour caesarean section (between 4 and 10 cm dilated) followed by an MTL (> 14 weeks) or preterm birth (<30 weeks)
4. Pregnant, but will be less than 14+0 weeks’ gestation at the time of the allocated intervention (Group A) OR
5. Not yet pregnant but considering a further pregnancy (Group B)
Participant exclusion criteriaPotential participants will not be eligible for the trial if:
1. They are more than 14+0 weeks pregnant at the time of randomisation (as insertion of TAC is associated with higher risk beyond this gestation)
2. They already have a cerclage or (Arabin) pessary in situ
3. They are not planning another pregnancy
4. They have a history of preterm birth (spontaneous/iatrogenic) prior to the term emergency section
5. They are pregnant and expecting more than one baby (multiple pregnancy)
Recruitment start date01/07/2024
Recruitment end date01/01/2026

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

St Thomas' Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom
Uclh
250 Euston Road
London
NW1 2PQ
United Kingdom
Rosie Hospital
Robinson Way
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
Liverpool Womens Hospital
Crown Street
Liverpool
L8 7SS
United Kingdom
Leicester General Hospital
Gwendolen Road
Leicester
LE5 4PW
United Kingdom
The Royal Victoria Infirmary
Queen Victoria Road
Newcastle upon Tyne
TS1 4LP
United Kingdom
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Chelsea & Westminster Hospital
369 Fulham Road
London
SW10 9NH
United Kingdom
West Middlesex University Hospital
Twickenham Road
Isleworth
TW7 6AF
United Kingdom
Sunderland Royal Hospital
Kayll Road
Sunderland
SR4 7TP
United Kingdom
Heartlands Hospital
Bordesley Green East
Bordesley Green
Birmingham
B9 5ST
United Kingdom
Birmingham Womens Hospital
Metchley Park Road
Birmingham
B15 2TG
United Kingdom
St Michaels Hospital
St. Michaels Hospital
Hayle
TR27 4JA
United Kingdom
Royal United Hospital
Combe Park
Bath
BA1 3NG
United Kingdom
Princess Anne Hospital
Coxford Road
Southampton
SO16 5YA
United Kingdom
Southmead Hospital
Southmead Road
Westbury-on-trym
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
Poole Hospital
Longfleet Road
Poole
BH15 2JB
United Kingdom
St James's University Hospital
Gledow Wing
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Leeds General Infirmary
Great George Street
Leeds
LS1 3EX
United Kingdom
Royal Hampshire County Hospital
Romsey Road
Winchester
SO22 5DG
United Kingdom
St Richards Hospital
Spitalfield Lane
Chichester
PO19 6SE
United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley Way
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Kent and Canterbury Hospital
Ethelbert Road
Canterbury
CT1 3NG
United Kingdom
University Hospital Coventry
Clifford Bridge Road
Coventry
CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
Barnet Hospital
Wellhouse Lane
Barnet
EN5 3DJ
United Kingdom
Royal London Hospital
Whitechapel
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom
Conquest Hospital
The Ridge
St. Leonards-on-sea
TN37 7RD
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

King's College London
Hospital/treatment centre

Strand
London
WC2R 2LS
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)2078487306
Email vpri@kcl.ac.uk
Website http://www.kcl.ac.uk/index.aspx
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0220mzb33

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Action Medical Research; Grant Codes: GN2967
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
actionmedres, action medical research for children, AMR
Location
United Kingdom
Borne

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/07/2027
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryStored in non-publicly available repository, Not expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination plan1. Planned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal
2. Presentation at local and regional conferences
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available and will be stored in a non-publicly available repository. Data will be stored on the ABOVE Trial Database, which is hosted within the already established PCN Database (https://www.medscinet.net/ukpcn). This is a secure web-based platform containing standardised clinical information regarding women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Participant identifiers are kept on a secure separate but linked Medscinet “Patient Details” database, which is only accessible to authorised site users and the PCN Database Project Manager (where the ABOVE study database is hosted) for providing user access and assistance in resolving queries.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Group A
version 3.0
17/05/2024 No Yes
Participant information sheet Group B
version 3.0
17/05/2024 No Yes

Additional files

45491_PIS_GroupA_v3.0.pdf
Group A
45491_PIS_GroupB_v3.0.pdf
Group B

Editorial Notes

17/05/2024: Study's existence confirmed by the NIHR.