The effects of spironolactone on endothelial function, autonomic function and glycaemic control in diabetic patients with poor blood pressure control

ISRCTN	ISRCTN76558770
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN76558770
Secondary identifying numbers	SAM 001

Submission date: 16/07/2007
Registration date: 27/07/2007
Last edited: 12/05/2011

Recruitment status: No longer recruiting
Overall study status: Completed
Condition category: Circulatory System

Prospectively registered

Protocol

Statistical analysis plan

Results

Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Krishnan Swaminathan
Scientific

Department of Clinical Pharmacology
Level 7
Ninewells Hospital
Dundee
DD1 9SY
United Kingdom

Phone	+44 1382 632180
Email	krishnan.swaminathan@nhs.net

Study information

Study design	Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design.
Primary study design	Interventional
Secondary study design	Randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)	Not specified
Study type	Not Specified
Scientific title
Study hypothesis	Patients with diabetes are at particularly high risk of cardiovascular disease. Infact, macrovascular disease accounts for 70 % of the mortality in type 2 diabetes, making heart attacks and strokes two to four times more frequent in these patients compared to controls. The combination of diabetes and hypertension is a particularly strong cardiovascular risk factor. Vascular endothelial dysfunction is a recognised risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Blocking aldosterone with spironolactone in patients with cardiac failure can reverse endothelial dysfunction in this patient group, as well as improving the prognostic markers of PIIINP, BNP and heart rate variability. Additionally, the RALES (Randomised Aldactone Evaluation Study) and EPHESUS (Eplerenone Postacute myocardial infarction Heart failure Efficacy and Survival Study) studies have shown a dramatic reduction in total mortality (approximately 30%) with aldosterone blockade in patients with heart failure already taking the recognised optimum treatment for this condition. This lends weight to the concept that reducing endothelial dysfunction by spironolactone may be associated with reduction in real cardiovascular events. The question then arose whether similar benefits might be seen in other diseases. It was therefore somewhat surprising that in a normotensive population of patients with type 2 diabetes, spironolactone actually worsened the key prognostic marker of endothelial function while also worsening glycaemic control. The situation might however be different in diabetics with poorly controlled hypertension where a spironolactone induced fall in BP might instead lead to an improvement in endothelial and autonomic function. We therefore studied whether, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and poorly controlled hypertension, taking low-dose spironolactone in addition to their normal cardiovascular medication, would improve the important prognostic marker of endothelial function, as logic suggests that this should be of benefit. In addition we wish to investigate whether spironolactone treatment also brings about an improvement in the other prognostic markers of PIIINP, BNP and heart rate variability. We also wanted to see if the spironolactone induced worsening of glycaemic control that we saw in a previous study in normotensive diabetics was reproducible.
Ethics approval(s)	The Tayside Committee for Medical Ethics, Scotland, approved on 28/09/2004 (ref: 236/03)
Condition	Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension
Intervention	In this cross-over study, each participant was treated with two different drugs and a placebo, one at a time, in addition to his or her standard medication. Each drug / placebo treatment lasted for 4 weeks, and there was a 2-week washout period between each treatment (during the washout period participants took their standard medication only). Therefore, the entire duration of the intervention was 16 weeks. Details of the intervention treatments are as follows: 1. Spironolactone, 25 mg orally per day for 1 week, increased to 50 mg per day for the next 3 weeks if potassium levels were within normal limits (total duration of treatment 4 weeks) 2. Amlodipine, 5 mg orally per day for 4 weeks 3. Placebo for 4 weeks
Intervention type	Drug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
Phase	Not Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)	Spironolactone, Amlodipine
Primary outcome measure	Improvement in endothelial function, assessed 24 months after the start of the trial.
Secondary outcome measures	The following were assessed 24 months after the start of the trial: 1. Improvement in the other prognostic markers of PIIINP and B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) 2. Improvement in heart rate variability
Overall study start date	01/01/2005
Overall study end date	31/12/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)	Patient
Age group	Not Specified
Sex	Both
Target number of participants	50
Participant inclusion criteria	Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension who were on standard treatment were recruited. All patients were on either Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers.
Participant exclusion criteria	1. Blood pressure <140 mm Hg systolic and 80 mm Hg diastolic 2. Recent admission to hospital within last 4 weeks 3. History of alcohol abuse 4. Liver or renal impairment 5. Heart failure 6. On potassium sparing diuretics, insulin or warfarin (procedural risks)
Recruitment start date	01/01/2005
Recruitment end date	31/12/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

Scotland
United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Clinical Pharmacology

Dundee
DD1 9SY
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Tenovus Scotland (UK)
Charity

234 St. Vincent Street
Glasgow
G2 5RJ
United Kingdom

Phone	+44 (0)1292 311276
Email	gen.sec@talk21.com
Website	http://www.tenovus-scotland.org.uk/TS_homepage.html
"ROR"	https://ror.org/037866t57

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Tenovus Scotland (ref: T03/21) (UK)

No information available

Northwood Trust (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share	No
IPD sharing plan summary	Not provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination plan	Not provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type	Details	Date created	Date added	Peer reviewed?	Patient-facing?
Results article	results	01/05/2008		Yes	No