Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Learning to read can be a complicated process, especially for children in less developed countries. Regardless of the language a child learns to read in, a good reader will be able to identify works on a page and take meaning from those words. Children who can read well (fluency) are often able to achieve more academically, and so better programs are needed to help teach children to read better. This initial study is going to look at a random group of households in the Nyanza province (Kenya) in order to try and find a good way of helping children to improve their reading fluency. The study will compare a range of different programs, each more intense than the last, in order to try and find out whether using children’s story books in addition to parent training can help improve vocabulary skills and early language development in the short-run. The study will also look at the way parents and children use the storybooks, how parents change their priorities and behaviors after they learn more about reading with their children, and what level of intensity of the intervention is needed to achieve an impact.
Who can participate?
Households with children between the ages of 2 and 6 years old who live near to a small primary school in Nyanza province (Kenya).
What does the study involve?
Participating households are randomly allocated to one of five study groups. Those in the first group do not receive any books and continue as usual. Those in the second group are given a set of children's storybooks in English, Luo and Swahili. Those in the third group also receive the story books, but the parents of the children are given training to help them with dialogic reading skills. This is where the adult helps the child to learn to read by using questions about the books and praising the child’s efforts to take part in the reading experience, such as by naming objects or actions in the book. Those in the third group receive the story books and parent training, but as also given extra training and SMS reminders encouraging them to stay involved with the project and to be more aware of strategies to help their children. Those in the fifth group receive the same as the forth group, except that they also receive home visits to help them, answer any questions and allow them to give feedback about the project. At the start of the study and again after five weeks, the children have their vocabulary tested and parents/care givers complete a survey in order to find out if their reading habits have changed.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Households taking part in the study benefit from receiving children’s story books and some parents will benefit from learning new skills for reading with their children. There are no risks for participants taking part in the study.
Where is the study run from?
The study takes place in households in the Nyanza province (Kenya)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2015 to December 2016
Who is funding the study?
World Bank Group (USA)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Owen Ozier
Study website
Contact information
Type
Scientific
Contact name
Dr Owen Ozier
ORCID ID
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-0888
Contact details
The World Bank
1818 H St NW
Mail Stop MC3-311
Washington DC
20433
United States of America
Additional identifiers
EudraCT/CTIS number
IRAS number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
N/A
Study information
Scientific title
EMERGE Reading Pilot Study: Adaptation and scaling of early reading interventions in Kenya to improve early childhood development (Phase 1)
Acronym
EMERGE
Study hypothesis
The aim of this study is to investigate:
1. Whether the distribution of children’s storybooks, in addition to a training component for parents, improves vocabulary skills and early language development in the short-run
2. Whether parents and children make use of the storybooks, and if so, how often and what activities they substitute away from in order to devote more time to reading activities
3. Whether parents exhibit differential sensitivity to cues from their children as a result of the intervention
4. Which of the intervention delivery method being piloted leads to the highest up-take
5. Whether different sub-populations respond different to the four intervention variants
6. Whether illiterate parents use the books with their children
Ethics approval(s)
1. University of California, Berkeley Institutional Review Board, 27/05/2015, ref: 2014-09-6699
2. Human Subjects Committee for Innovations for Poverty Action, 03/12/2015, ref: 5691
3. Maseno University Ethics Review Committee, 03/11/2014, ref: 00118/14
Study design
Multi-arm clustered randomized control trial
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Cluster randomised trial
Study setting(s)
Community
Study type
Other
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet.
Condition
Poor early development of cognition and language in children
Intervention
The intervention has 5 study arms, with increasing levels of intensity of the intervention. Households in the same primary school catchment areas are randomly assigned to one of the 5 study arms using the Stata software package.
Group 1: Participants in this arm do not receive the intervention (comparator arm)
Group 2: Participants receive a set of children's storybooks in English, Luo and Swahili
Group 3: Participants receive the same intervention as group 2, in addition to a parent training on dialogic reading skills, and SMS reminders to keep parents engaged with the books (added 23/02/2016)
Group 4: Participants receive the same intervention as group 3, in addition to a booster training to keep parents engaged with the books and aware of strategies for reading and exploring the books with their children (added 23/02/2016)
Group 5: Participants receive the same intervention as group 4, in addition to home visits to encourage parents and to address individual parent's questions, and allow for practice and feedback
Participants in all groups are followed up after 5 weeks.
After data is collected to determine short-run impacts, the remaining eligible households who have not received an intervention will receive the same books as all others.
Previous:
Group 3: Participants receive the same intervention as group 2, in addition to a parent training on dialogic reading skills
Group 4: Participants receive the same intervention as group 3, in addition to a booster training and SMS reminders to keep parents engaged with the and aware of strategies for reading and exploring the books with their children
Intervention type
Other
Primary outcome measure
1. The number of books in the home is measured by an enumerator's observation in the home at 5 weeks
2. Frequency of book use is measured by survey at baseline and endline (5 weeks)
3. Expressive and receptive vocabulary are measured by assessing children using adaptations of the British Picture Vocabulary Scale and purpose-specific illustrations at baseline and endline (5 weeks)
Added 27/04/2016:
4. Comprehension is measured by questions specific to storybook content at endline (5 weeks)
Secondary outcome measures
1. Home stimulation practices are measured by a Mother-Child observation conducted by an enumerator at baseline and endline (5 weeks)
2. Program take-up by intervention delivery method and sub-population include primary outcome measures, but with sub-populations divided according to baseline characteristics, including direct assessments of caregiver literacy based on reading a sentence in each of three languages. This will be assessed at endline (5 weeks)
Overall study start date
31/10/2015
Overall study end date
31/12/2016
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Children aged between 2 to 6 years old and their primary care giver
2. Living within 1km of a small primary school (<20 children per class) in Nyanza province
Participant type(s)
Healthy volunteer
Age group
Mixed
Sex
Both
Target number of participants
10 communities, in which 50 households are randomly selected and assigned, for an estimated sample size of 750 children and 500 adult caregivers; an estimated 1250 in total.
Total final enrolment
867
Participant exclusion criteria
Developmental delays or health conditions that would interfere with a child’s ability to take a standard developmental assessment or participate in the intervention (i.e. blindness and deafness).
Recruitment start date
27/01/2016
Recruitment end date
30/11/2016
Locations
Countries of recruitment
Kenya
Study participating centre
Nyanza province
-
Kisumu
-
Kenya
Sponsor information
Organisation
The World Bank (USA)
Sponsor details
1818 H Street NW
Washington DC
20433
United States of America
Sponsor type
Industry
Website
ROR
Funders
Funder type
Industry
Funder name
World Bank Group
Alternative name(s)
World Bank, The World Bank, Grupo Banco Mundial, Banco Mundial, Groupe Banque Mondiale, Banque Mondiale, مجموعة البنك الدولي, Группа Всемирного банка, 世界银行, WBG
Funding Body Type
private sector organisation
Funding Body Subtype
International organizations
Location
United States of America
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Planned publication of study results in a peer-reviewed journal.
Intention to publish date
31/12/2018
Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan
IPD sharing plan summary
Stored in repository
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/01/2020 | 25/11/2019 | Yes | No |