Effects of Peri-Operative fluid Restriction in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery

ISRCTN ISRCTN62621488
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN62621488
Secondary identifying numbers NTR573
Submission date
14/02/2006
Registration date
14/02/2006
Last edited
16/10/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr G. Samkar, van
Scientific

Academic Medical Center (AMC)
Department of Anesthesiology
H1- 128
P.O. Box 22660
Amsterdam
1100 DD
Netherlands

Study information

Study designRandomised, double blind, active controlled, parallel group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeOther
Scientific titleEffects of Peri-Operative fluid Restriction in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery
Study acronymEPOR trial
Study hypothesisOur hypothesis is that peri-operative fluid restriction will lead to a significant reduction of solid phase gastric emptying time measured by radionuclide scintigraphy, and a reduction in its related post-operative complications.
Ethics approval(s)Received from local medical ethics committee
ConditionPancreatic cancer
InterventionRestrictive peri-operative fluid management versus standardised peri-operative fluid management in Whipple surgery.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe primary endpoint is defined as the reduction of minutes needed to achieve a 50% emptying of the stomach (T50) due to a restricted fluid infusion regime.
Secondary outcome measuresThe secondary endpoints are the following:
1. Total amount used of furosemide (no prior usage)
2. Total amount used intra-operatively of noradrenalin
3. Blood urea and creatinine levels: a rise of more than 10% of pre-operative values measured at: pre-assessment versus day 1, 3 and 7 post-operatively
4. Albumin levels: day 1, 3 and 7 post-operatively
5. Nutritional intake (calculation by dietician)
6. Duration of hospital stay
7. The length of remaining duodenum will be measured during operation (distance between pylorus and duodeno-jejunostomy)
Overall study start date01/03/2006
Overall study end date31/12/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants50
Participant inclusion criteria1. Age range >18 years
2. Male patients, or female patients of non childbearing potential or with adequate contraception
3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-IV
4. Patients who will undergo elective pancreatic surgery
5. Written informed consent
Participant exclusion criteria1. Age range: <18 years
2. ASA classification V
3. Emergency operations
4. Pregnancy
5. Breast feeding period
6. Informed consent missing
7. Alcohol abuse (more than 35 units a week)
8. Drug abuse (opiates, cocaine)
9. SaO2 <90% (room atmosphere), SpO2 <8 kPa
10. Presumed non cooperatives
11. Legal incapacity
12. Refusal to undergo epidural anaesthesia
13. Dialysis or fluid restriction based on renal failure
14. Any clinical condition which does not justify study participation in the investigator's opinion
Recruitment start date01/03/2006
Recruitment end date31/12/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Academic Medical Center (AMC)
Amsterdam
1100 DD
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Academic Medical Center (AMC) (Netherlands)
Hospital/treatment centre

P.O. Box 22660
Amsterdam
1100 DD
Netherlands

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03t4gr691

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Academic Medical Center (AMC) (Netherlands)
Private sector organisation / Universities (academic only)
Alternative name(s)
Academic Medical Center, AMC
Location
Netherlands

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 14/10/2015 Yes No

Editorial Notes

16/10/2015: Added publication reference.