Factors influencing the outcome of children attending Croydon CAMHS

ISRCTN ISRCTN42914685
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN42914685
Secondary identifying numbers 4604
Submission date
18/06/2010
Registration date
18/06/2010
Last edited
13/12/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Ms Tamsin Ford
Scientific

Institute of Health Services Research
St Luke's Campus
School Of Education
Heavitree Road
Exeter
EX1 2LU
United Kingdom

Email Tamsin.ford@pms.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulticentre randomised interventional diagnosis and treatment trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleFactors influencing the outcome of children attending Croydon Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS): a multicentre cohort study
Study acronymCroydon CAMHS Outcome Project
Study hypothesisThis project will focus on the effectiveness of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). It will evaluate a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of attendance at CAMHS by judging clinical outcome measures against normative data from national epidemiological studies. It will also identify factors predicting the outcome of children attending CAMHS with the aim of generating an empirically derived prognostic index. It will also assess the feasibility of the adoption of a standardized diagnostic assessment into routine practice. It will study the attitudes of CAMHS clinicians toward routine outcome monitoring and how these change over the course of the project. Finally, it will compare the rates of public sector service use over 18 months by CAMHS attenders as compared with a community sample of untreated children with similar psychopathology from a national study with a view to planning a more detailed cost-effectiveness study in the longer term.
Ethics approval(s)Joint South London and Maudsley and the Institute of Psychiatry NHS Research Ethics Committees, 14/09/2005, ref: 150/05
ConditionTopic: Mental Health Research Network, Generic Health Relevance and Cross Cutting Themes; Subtopic: All Diagnoses, Generic Health Relevance (all Subtopics); Disease: Not Applicable, Paediatrics
Intervention1. To evaluate the utility of the SDQ "added value" computer algorithm as a tool to allow clinics to measure their performance with that of untreated children in the community
2. To explore staff perceptions, about the use of a standardized diagnostic assessment and routine outcome monitoring
3. To gather preliminary data, to establish whether an in depth study of cost effectiveness is feasible
4. To identify factors, influencing the outcome of children attending Croydon CAMHS in order to generate an empirically based measure of case complexity

There was no treatment arm – children were assessed at baseline using the Development and Well-being Assessment which includes a brief measure call the SDQ (completed by parents) prior to assessment, and a brief in house questionnaire completed by the assessing clinician about what difficulties the child had, their level of function according to the CGAS, and was their assessment completed.

Every six months for two subsequent years the parents completed an SDQ, while the clinicians reported on how they perceived the child’s difficulties, the CGAS and what interventions had happened in the previous six months – if the child's was discharged, clinician follow up ceased (for obvious reasons) but parental follow up did not – we are just chasing the final follow ups for the final patients and data collection will close at the end of this month.

Follow-up length: 26 months
Study entry: single randomisation only
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureSDQ total difficulties and impact scores, according to parents at six monthly intervals.
Secondary outcome measures1. CGAS scores at 6 monthly intervals
2. Parental rating of whether coming to the clinic has changed the child's difficulties according to the follow up SDQ at six monthly intervals
2. The SDQ "added value", as produced by the computer algorithm
Overall study start date01/03/2006
Overall study end date31/05/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit5 Years
Upper age limit10 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned sample size: 300; UK sample size: 300
Participant inclusion criteria1. Subsequent referrals accepted to the waiting list of two district tier 2 - 3 CAMHS services
2. Aged between 5 - 10 years and 9 months over 2 years and 2 months
Participant exclusion criteria1. Younger than five or older than 10 years and 9 months at the time of they are accepted onto the waiting list
2. Child is looked after by their local authority, because of the difficulty of parental responsibility changing during the course of the study and because of the difficulty in finding informants that know the child well enough
3. The parent has insufficient English to complete the questionnaires
4. Emergency and paediatric liaison referrals because of the difficulty in gaining consent and completing the base line assessment between referral and first assessment
Recruitment start date01/03/2006
Recruitment end date31/05/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Institute of Health Services Research
Exeter
EX1 2LU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) (UK)
Not defined

Institute of Psychiatry
16 De Crespigny Park
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom

Website http://www.slam.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/015803449

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK) - Clinician Scientist Fellowship (ref: G108/625)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/04/2013 Yes No