Randomised controlled evaluation of the effectiveness of behavioural intervention in high risk gay men attending an sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic

ISRCTN ISRCTN27508373
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN27508373
Secondary identifying numbers RDC00058
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
08/12/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Judith Stephenson
Scientific

Department of Genitourinary Medicine
Public Health
University College London
The Mortimer Market Centre
Off Capper Street
Tottenham Court Road
London
WC1 6AU
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeNot Specified
Scientific title
Study hypothesisDespite clear evidence that gay men are at increased risk of HIV infection, there has been little rigorous evaluation of the effectiveness of behavioural intervention in reducing sexual risk behaviour in the group. We propose a randomised control trial (RCT) to examine the effectiveness of group work in promoting safer sex in gay men who have high risk sexual lifestyles, since they are at a high risk of transmitting and acquiring the HIV infection. Building on experience in this department, the feasibility of various forms of group intervention will be investigated during a pilot survey of gay men attending an STD clinic. In the subsequent RCT, high risk gay men will be randomly assigned to either the intervention under evaluation, or to standard management as currently provided in the clinic.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
ConditionInfection and infestations: Sexually transmitted diseases
InterventionOne day 'safe' sex workshop vs standard management
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureOutcome measures will focus on the nature, as well as the number of sexual partnerships and the type of sexual practices within those relationships. STD rates will be a further outcome measure. Differences in outcome will be compared between intervention and control groups at 6 and 12 months after intervention.
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/05/1995
Overall study end date01/07/2000

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexMale
Target number of participants290
Participant inclusion criteriaAll participants will be gay men attending an STD clinic. In order to recruit gay men at high risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, those who present with an acute STD or who indicate that they are having unprotected anal sex will be invited to enter the trial (except those in stable monogamous relationships where both partners repeatedly test negative). Estimated sample size will be around 145 men in each group of the study.
Participant exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Recruitment start date01/05/1995
Recruitment end date01/07/2000

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Genitourinary Medicine
London
WC1 6AU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

NHS Executive London (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 16/06/2001 Yes No