Does routine peri-operative continuous cell salvage in cardiac surgery reduce exposure to allogeneic blood? A randomised controlled trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN17615029
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17615029
Secondary identifying numbers PO1003
Submission date
20/04/2005
Registration date
24/05/2005
Last edited
22/10/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Andrew Klein
Scientific

Papworth Hospital NHS Trust
Papworth Everard
Cambridge
CB3 8RE
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typePrevention
Scientific title
Study hypothesisWidespread use of new cell salvage technology will reduce the numbers of patients receiving red cells as well as the total units used.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from Peterborough and Fenland Local Research Ethics Committee on the 22nd April 2005.
ConditionBlood transfusion following cardiac surgery
InterventionPatients will be randomised to either the cell saver or control group. A Continuous Auto-Transfusion System (CATS, Fresenius Hemocare) cell saver will be used intra- and post-operatively with the aim of using all processed blood prior to the use of donor blood. Patients in the control group will be managed according to the Papworth hospital protocol.

Please note that as of 06/11/2007 the anticipated end date of this trial was changed from 31st December 2007 to 21st May 2007. This trial has now finished recruiting.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureThe proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic blood. All outcomes measured at 30 days post surgery.
Secondary outcome measures1. The number of units of allogeneic red blood cells transfused during first-time cardiac surgery
2. The use of blood products such as fresh frozen plasma and platelet concentrates
3. Adverse events
4. Resource use and cost savings of using CATS in this specific group of patients

All outcomes measured at 30 days post surgery.
Overall study start date01/05/2005
Overall study end date21/05/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants206
Participant inclusion criteriaPatients for non-emergency first-time Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) with planned use of cardiopulmonary bypass, and patients for valve repair or replacement, or combined CABG and valve procedure.
Participant exclusion criteria1. Refusal to receive blood or blood products
2. Previous cardiac or thoracic surgery
3. Having an unacceptable risk, as per investigator judgement
4. Known serious coagulation disorders
5. Known blood disorder (thalassemia, chronic anaemia, lymphoproliferative disorder etc.)
6. Any contra-indication to antifibrinolytics
7. The receipt of any investigational drug or participation in a device trial during the course of this trial
8. Where a specific request for cell salvage has been made by the surgeon
Recruitment start date01/05/2005
Recruitment end date21/05/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Papworth Hospital NHS Trust
Cambridge
CB3 8RE
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Papworth Hospital NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Papworth Hospital
Papworth Everard
Cambridge
CB3 8RE
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01qbebb31

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Devices and consumables are being provided free of charge by Fresenius Hemocare (UK). No other source of funding secured to date.

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results 01/11/2008 Yes No