Medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13 - 20 weeks
ISRCTN | ISRCTN17262711 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17262711 |
Secondary identifying numbers | SCR2000/1 |
- Submission date
- 23/02/2010
- Registration date
- 06/04/2010
- Last edited
- 01/08/2012
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English Summary
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Prof Stephen Robson
Scientific
Scientific
Institute of Cellular Medicine
3rd floor, William Leech Building
Medical School
Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4LP
United Kingdom
s.c.robson@ncl.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Single centre randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | A randomised controlled trial comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13 - 20 weeks |
Study hypothesis | Compared to surgical termination of pregnancy (STOP), medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) would be associated with greater psychological distress at 2 weeks after the procedure, as measured by the Impact of Events Scale (IES) at 13 - 20 weeks gestation. |
Ethics approval(s) | Joint Ethics Committee of the Newcastle and North Tyneside Health Authority approved on the 26th April 2000 (ref: 2000/63) |
Condition | Termination of unwanted pregnancy |
Intervention | Women randomised to STOP: All nulliparous women and multiparous women greater than 17 weeks' gestation were primed with Gemeprost 1 mg vaginally 3 and 6 hours prior to the anticipated time of STOP. Multiparous women between 13+0 and 16+6 weeks were primed with Gemeprost 1 mg vaginally 3 hours prior to the anticipated time of STOP. All STOPs were performed under general anaesthesia by one experienced surgeon. Cases between 13+0 and 14+6 vacuum aspiration was performed Cases greater than or equal to 15+0 weeks dilatation and evacuation was performed. Women randomised to MTOP: Women were given mifepristone 200 mg orally. 36 - 48 hours later misoprostol 800 µg was administered vaginally followed by 400 µg vaginally or orally (depending on amount of vaginal bleeding) every 3 hours up to a maximum of 4 doses. If abortion had not occurred by midnight a further dose of mifepristone 200 mg orally was administered followed by gemeprost 1 mg vaginally 3 hourly from 0800 hours up to a maximum of 5 doses. If abortion had still not occurred by 0800 hours the following morning the MTOP was deemed to have failed and STOP arranged. All women received periabortion antibiotic prophylaxis with doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily, commencing on the day prior to abortion. Women having STOP also received metronidazole 1 g rectally at the time of abortion. All women were invited back for follow up at two weeks post-procedure. |
Intervention type | Drug |
Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
Phase | Phase IV |
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Mifepristone, misoprotol |
Primary outcome measure | Impact of Event Scale (IES) at two weeks after the procedure. This 15 item scale has 7 intrusion and 8 avoidance items. |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Clinical effectiveness of procedure, measured at two weeks post-procedure 2. Complications, measured at two weeks post-procedure 3. Procedure specific symptoms, measured at two weeks post-procedure 4. Acceptability, measured at two weeks post-procedure 5. General health Questionnaire-12 item (GHQ-12), measured at baseline and two weeks post-procedure 6. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), measured at baseline and two weeks post-procedure 7. Satisfaction with care received before during and after procedure (excellent/very good/good/fair/poor), measured at two weeks post-procedure |
Overall study start date | 01/05/2000 |
Overall study end date | 31/01/2004 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Female |
Target number of participants | 130 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Women accepted for termination of pregnancy (TOP) under clause C of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990) amendment of the Abortion Act (1967) 2. Pregnancies between 13+0 and 19+6 weeks' gestation at the time of abortion 3. Aged over 16 years; women under 16 years of age were eligible for inclusion if deemed Fraser competent by the clinical practitioner and where a parent or guardian was present and also willing to give written consent |
Participant exclusion criteria | 1. Foetal congenital abnormality 2. Medical disease precluding MTOP 3. Unable to speak English (less than 5% of women presenting for TOP) |
Recruitment start date | 01/05/2000 |
Recruitment end date | 31/01/2004 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Institute of Cellular Medicine
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4LP
United Kingdom
NE2 4LP
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre
Hospital/treatment centre
The Freeman Hospital
High Heaton
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE7 7DN
England
United Kingdom
Jennifer.Walker@nuth.nhs.uk | |
Website | http://www.newcastle-hospitals.org.uk/ |
https://ror.org/05p40t847 |
Funders
Funder type
University/education
Newcastle University (UK)
Private sector organisation / Universities (academic only)
Private sector organisation / Universities (academic only)
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/11/2010 | Yes | No |