Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
This study will evaluate the impact of results based financing (RBF) on priority maternal (mother) and child health services in rural districts of Zimbabwe. RBF is an output based financing mechanism where the health providers receive financial incentives to provide a pre-agreed set of services designed to help people in poor countries to live healthier lives. The objective of the Zimbabwe RBF impact evaluation is to inform policy regarding the effectiveness of the RBF model and support the government with additional evidence for potential scale up. The primary research question is – “What is the causal effect of results based financing with suspension of user fees on priority population health utilization and outcome measures in intervention districts?”
Who can participate?
Participating health facilities come from the selected 16 rural districts for implementation of RBF.
What does the study involve?
The government has selected 16 districts to implement RBF with two in each rural province of the country. All health facilities in these 16 districts will receive RBF incentives every 3 months based on a set of indicators related to maternal and child health. The facilities receive incentives on quantity (volume of services), quality (adherence to national standards of care), and client satisfaction. All participating health facilities receive RBF resources according to their level of service provision (primary, secondary or hybrid, i.e. primary plus secondary) and remoteness. The comparison districts have been selected within each province with pair-matching on geographical accessibility (i.e. rural and remoteness), type and level of health facilities, average facility catchment population, proportion of staff in position, presence of key staff such as the District Medical Officer, health services utilization rates such as antenatal care coverage, postnatal care coverage, institutional delivery and immunization
rates. The facilities in comparison districts will not receive any RBF incentives (business-as-usual).
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The health facilities will benefit from the financial resources tied with performance. There are no side effects or risks of this intervention.
Where is the study run from?
There are 356 health facilities from 16 rural districts participating in this study. The implementing agency is the Ministry of Health and Child Care, Zimbabwe.
When is study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
March 2012 to March 2015.
Who is funding the study?
Governments of Norway and the UK through the Health Results Innovation Trust Fund administered by the World Bank
Who is the main contact?
Ashis Das
adas8@worldbank.org
Study website
Additional identifiers
EudraCT/CTIS number
IRAS number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
N/A
Study information
Scientific title
The effects of results based financing on maternal and child health access and utilization in rural Zimbabwe: Impact Evaluation of Zimbabwes Health Results Based Financing Project
Acronym
Zimbabwe RBF IE
Study hypothesis
Results based financing increases access to and utilization of maternal and child health services in rural Zimbabwe
Ethics approval(s)
Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe, 29/11/2011, ref. MRCZ/A/1648
Study design
Controlled before and after study; quasi-experimental study
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)
Other
Study type
Quality of life
Patient information sheet
Condition
Maternal and child health
Intervention
Health facilities within RBF districts will receive incentives every quarter based on attaining
1. Quantity (volume of services)
2. Quality (adherence to national standards of care)
3. Client satisfaction
Health facilities in the control districts receive no incentives (business-as-usual).
Intervention type
Other
Primary outcome measure
Health utilization indicators:
1. Antenatal care
2. Institutional delivery
3. Postnatal care
4. Immunization
5. Outpatient consultations
6. Referral
7. Adoption of family planning methods
8. ARV prophylaxis
Household level indicators:
1. Household health seeking behavior
2. Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure
3. Satisfaction on the service provider
These will be measured through a household survey at the end of the intervention
Secondary outcome measures
Health facility infrastructure indicators:
1. Drug stockout rates
2. Availability of drugs
3. Availability of clinical protocols
4. Availability of equipment
5. Updated records
Quality of care indicators:
1. Counseling and client interaction
2. Waiting time
3. Physical examination
Equity indicators:
1. Utilization of health care and quality of care indicators vis-à-vis clients' socio-economic and residence status
Health worker indicators:
1. Health worker training status
2. Knowledge
3. Motivation
4. Job satisfaction
These will be measured through a health facility survey at the end of the intervention
Overall study start date
01/03/2012
Overall study end date
01/03/2015
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Health facilities within the selected 16 rural districts and matched control districts
2. Health facilities contracted under RBF project
Participant type(s)
Patient
Age group
Other
Sex
Both
Target number of participants
All health facilities in participating rural districts (n=356)
Participant exclusion criteria
1. Health facilities outside the selected 32 rural districts
2. Health facilities not contracted under RBF project
Recruitment start date
01/03/2012
Recruitment end date
01/03/2015
Locations
Countries of recruitment
United States of America, Zimbabwe
Study participating centre
The World Bank
Washington, D.C.
20433
United States of America
Sponsor information
Organisation
Health Results Innovation Trust Fund, World Bank (USA)
Sponsor details
The World Bank
1818 H St NW
Washington
DC
20433
United States of America
Sponsor type
Government
Website
ROR
Funders
Funder type
Government
Funder name
Health Results Innovation Trust Fund, World Bank (USA)
Alternative name(s)
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Location
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Not provided at time of registration
2017 thesis in https://doi.org/10.17037/PUBS.04539376 (added 25/06/2020)
Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan
IPD sharing plan summary
Not provided at time of registration
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|