Submission date
02/11/2016
Registration date
10/11/2016
Last edited
29/11/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Depression is a major global public health threat and by 2030 levels are predicted to be the second leading cause of disease burden and disability worldwide. Anxiety and depression commonly over-lap or co-exist and are prevalent amongst older people with up to 20% of older people reporting symptoms of depression. Depression and anxiety in older people often go undetected and are poorly managed in primary care, particularly in people with other long term health problems. One barrier to being able to spot depression and anxiety is that older people may not go to their GP with depression because of the stigma (negative associations) they have about mental health problems. It has been found that older people prefer to have talking therapies rather than taking antidepressant medications. Behavioural activation (BA) is a short form of cognitive behavioural therapy (a type of talking therapy that helps people change the way they think and behave). It has previously been found to be effective in the management of depression and can be given by non-mental health trained practitioners. The aim of this study is to find out whether it is possible and practical; for non-traditional providers (NTPs) to deliver BA to older people with anxiety and/or depression.

Who can participate?
Adults aged 65 and over who have symptoms of anxiety and depression

What does the study involve?
At the start of the study, participants are visited at home by a Research Nurse where they are asked to confirm that they are happy to take part and fill in some questionnaires. The participants are then randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in the first group are advised to go to their GP so that they can receive usual care. Those in the second group are contacted by a worker from Age UK and arrange 4-6 one-to-one appointments with them. The appointments can take place at a time and a place convenient to the participant (in their home for example) or over the telephone and last for approximately 30-60 minutes. During the appointments, the Age UK worker discusses strategies to help with low mood or stress with the participant. The Age UK worker also discusses types of activities that participants may be interested in, and then tries to help them to attend and take part in that activity or join a group, and attend with them if the participant wishes. At the start of the study and then again after four months, participants in both groups complete a number of questionnaires to assess their mental wellbeing. In addition, the number of participants who have taken part is recorded to see if conducting a larger study would be possible.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants who receive the BA may benefit from receiving the one-to-one support and taking part in group activities which could help improve their symptoms. There is a risk that some participants may find the visits with the Research Nurse tiring or upsetting.

Where is the study run from?
1. Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University (UK)
2. Age UK North Staffordshire (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2015 to August 2017

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Heather Burroughs
h.burroughs@keele.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Type

Public

Contact name

Dr Heather Burroughs

ORCID ID

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2701-909X

Contact details

Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences
Keele University
Keele
ST5 5BG
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1782 734983
h.burroughs@keele.ac.uk

Additional identifiers

EudraCT/CTIS number

IRAS number

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Secondary identifying numbers

32442

Study information

Scientific title

NOTEPAD: a feasibility study for NOn-Traditional providers to support the management of Elderly People with Anxiety and Depression

Acronym

NOTEPAD

Study hypothesis

The aim of this study is to test whether it is possible and practical for non-traditional providers (NTPs) to deliver a simple psychosocial intervention, which has been developed by members of the research team, to older people with anxiety and/or depression.

Ethics approval(s)

National Research Ethics Committee North West – GM West, 16/08/2016, ref: 16/NW/0552

Study design

Single-centre randomised controlled feasibility study

Primary study design

Interventional

Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Study setting(s)

Community

Study type

Quality of life

Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet

Condition

Depression, anxiety and loneliness in older adults

Intervention

Eligible participants will be visited at home by a Research Nurse at a time and date to suit them. The participant will be asked to complete a consent form and a number of baseline questionnaires. This visit will last approximately 90 minutes. Participants will then be randomised by computer to the control or intervention group.

Intervention group: Participants will be offered an individual appointment with the third sector worker (NTP) at a local third sector service or in the participant’s home (depending on participant preference). The NTP will work as a mentor or ‘befriender’ to the participant and deliver an intervention developed from the team’s previous work. Four-six contacts between the participant and the NTP are anticipated, utilising a combination of face to face and telephone contact. The intervention is intended to be tailored to patient preference so there is some flexibility regarding the precise number of sessions, interval, mode of delivery and format.

Control group: Participants will be advised to see their own doctor (GP) so that they can receive the usual care.

For all participants, a follow up interview will take place 4 months after the baseline interview, during which the baseline questionnaires will be repeated.

Intervention type

Other

Primary outcome measure

1. Engagement of GP practices is measured by recording the number of GP practices that agree to participate of those approached
2. Recruitment, training and retention of NTPs is measured by monitoring how many NTPs undergo full training and are retained to the end of the study
3. Response rates to the screening questionnaire is measured by recording the number of target participants that will respond to screening as a percentage of the number mailed and invited to participate in the study
4. Participant recruitment rate is measured by the number of eligible participant who consent to participate in the study as a percentage of all eligible participants
5. Response rates to follow-up questionnaire is measured recording the number of participants who consent to participate that remain in the study until the end of follow-up at 4 months
6. Adherence to intervention is measured by reviewing NTP notes at 4 months, recording of sessions and qualitative interviews with NTPs and a sample of participants

Primary outcome:
Depression is measured using the Computerised Clinical Interview Schedule Revised (CIS-R) Score at baseline and 4 months.

Secondary outcome measures

1. Quality of life is measured using the CASP-12 questionnaire at baseline and 4 months
2. Loneliness is measured using the Adult Attitude to Loneliness questionnaire at baseline and 4 months
3. Vulnerability is measured using the Adult Attitude to Loneliness (AAG) at baseline and 4 months
4. Health-related quality of life is measured using the EQ-5D-5L at baseline and 4 months
5. Social participation is measured using the Social participation questionnaire at baseline and 4 months
6. Self-efficacy is measured using the Self Efficacy questionnaire at baseline and 4 months
7. Participant burden is measured using a question by the research nurse at baseline and 4 months

Overall study start date

01/09/2015

Overall study end date

31/08/2017

Reason abandoned (if study stopped)

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

1. Aged over 65
2. Registered at 1 of the 6 recruited practices
3. A score of 10 or higher on the PHQ9 and/or GAD7 (as indicated on a postal screening questionnaire and a pre-baseline telephone call)

Participant type(s)

Patient

Age group

Senior

Sex

Both

Target number of participants

100

Total final enrolment

36

Participant exclusion criteria

1. People at risk of self-harm/suicide
2. Alcohol/substance abuse
3. People in the palliative phase of an illness
4. Lacking capacity to consent
5. Living in a care home

Recruitment start date

01/12/2016

Recruitment end date

30/04/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

England, United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences
Keele University
Keele
ST5 5BG
United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Age UK North Staffordshire
19 Stafford Street
Stoke-on-Trent
ST1 1JW
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Organisation

Keele University

Sponsor details

Directorate of Engagement and Partnerships
iC2 Building
Keele
ST5 5NH
England
United Kingdom

Sponsor type

University/education

Website

ROR

https://ror.org/00340yn33

Funders

Funder type

Government

Funder name

National Institute for Health Research

Alternative name(s)

National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR

Funding Body Type

government organisation

Funding Body Subtype

National government

Location

United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Feasibility study results to be published by end July 2018.

Intention to publish date

31/07/2018

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share

No

IPD sharing plan

The current data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date.

IPD sharing plan summary

Data sharing statement to be made available at a later date

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 07/03/2018 Yes No
Results article qualitative results 19/01/2019 12/02/2020 Yes No
Results article 01/07/2019 29/11/2022 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Additional files

Editorial Notes

29/11/2022: Publication reference added. 12/02/2020: The following changes have been made: 1. Publication reference added. 2. The total final enrolment number has been added from the reference. 18/04/2018: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/09/2017 to 31/07/2018. 09/03/2018: Publication reference added. 16/11/2016: The recruitment start date has been updated from 10/11/2016 to 01/12/2016.