Submission date
30/06/2016
Registration date
06/07/2016
Last edited
30/11/2020
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Retrospectively registered
? Protocol not yet added
? SAP not yet added
Results added
? Raw data not yet added
Study completed

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
The gallbladder is a small, pouch-like organ found underneath the liver, which is responsible for storing bile (a chemical produced by the liver which helps with the digestion of fats) and making it more concentrated. In some cases, if there is too much cholesterol in the bile inside gallbladder, it can lead to the development of small stones (gallstones). In some cases gallstones can be very painful and it may be necessary for the gallbladder to be surgically removed. Older patients experience more complications after gallbladder removal compared with younger patients. However, most studies have not considered patient frailty, particularly in patients who undergo emergency gallbladder removal. The aim of this study is to find out whether there is a link between frailty and poor surgical outcomes (complications and death).

Who can participate?
Patients aged 65 and over who have gallstones who are scheduled for a routine or emergency gallbladder removal.

What does the study involve?
All patients are assessed using the Geriatric Assessment (GA) on the day that they are admitted to hospital. This includes a range of questionnaires and tests designed to evaluate the patient’s physical and emotional functionality as well as their nutritional status and the medications they take, so that their frailty can be determined. Participants then undergo their surgery as per standard practice and are followed up for thirty days so that any complications or death after surgery can be recorded, as well as the length of their hospital stay. This information is then compared with the results of the GA in order to look at the link between frailty and surgical outcomes.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits or risks involved with participating in this study.

Where is the study run from?
3rd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College (Poland)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2013 to March 2015

Who is funding the study?
3rd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College (Poland)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Jakub Kenig
jkenig@cm-uj.krakow.pl

Study website

Contact information

Type

Scientific

Contact name

Dr Jakub Kenig

ORCID ID

Contact details

)3rd Department of General Surgery
Jagiellonian Univeristy Medical College
Pradnicka str. 35-37
Krakow
21-202
Poland
+48 126 331 995
jkenig@cm-uj.krakow.pl

Additional identifiers

EudraCT/CTIS number

IRAS number

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Protocol/serial number

N/A

Study information

Scientific title

Geriatric assessment as a qualification element for elective and emergency cholecystectomy in older patients

Acronym

Study hypothesis

1. Frail patients who have qualified for an elective cholecystectomy can be safely operated upon
2. Frail patients who have qualified for an emergency cholecystectomy have higher postoperative morbidity and mortality

Ethics approval(s)

Jagiellonian University Medicall College approved the study, 22/05/2014, ref: KBET/128/B/2014

Study design

Observational case series

Primary study design

Observational

Secondary study design

Case series

Study setting(s)

Hospital

Study type

Treatment

Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet

Condition

Cholecystitis

Intervention

All included patients will be assessed using the Geriatric Assessment, which will be performed on the day of admission by trained physicians or, for emergency patients, by trained physicians or nurses. The GA comprises the validated instruments evaluating functional (Activities of Daily Living - ADL, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living - I-ADL), cognitive (Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test - BOMC and Clock Drawing Test - CDT), depressive (Geriatric Depression Scale - GDS), nutritional (Mini Nutritional Assessment - MNA) and polypharmacy status (number of drugs taken by the patient) with the range and the literature-based cut-off scores. A cumulative deficit model of frailty will be used. The equally weighted deficits, as a measure of accumulated vulnerability, included ADL/IADL, Geriatric Depression Score, BOMC/CDT, the Mini-Nutritional Assessment, CCS, and the Polypharmacy Assessment. The functional (ADL/IADL) and cognitive domains (BOMC/CDT) will be considered abnormal if one of the assessment tools showed literature-based impairment. The detection of deficits in two or more GA domains indicates an increased risk of disability or death and is used as the cut-off score for the GA set and also as the definition of frailty.

Participation in the study does not change anything in the treatment plan, surgery and postoperative rehabilitation. Enrolled patients will undergo elective/emergency laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy (decision of the surgeon and anesthesiologist). All operations will be performed by residents under the direct supervision of a consultant (who also served as the first assistant) or by the consultants themselves. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed using a standard three- or four-port technique and all emergency patients were treated surgically within 24 h after admission. Severity grading for the acute cholecystitis patients is according to the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines. The postoperative follow-up regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality will last for 30-days.

Intervention type

Other

Primary outcome measure

1. Post-operative complications, defined as any event occurring within 30 days of surgery that required treatment not routinely applied in the post-operative period, is measured through telephone interviews and clinic visits at 30 days post-surgery
2. Post-operative mortality, defined as death within 30 days after surgery, is measured using review of medical records or contact with the appropriate registry office

Secondary outcome measures

Length of hospital stay, defined as the time between the day of admission until discharge from hospital, is measured through medical record review.

Overall study start date

01/01/2013

Overall study end date

01/03/2015

Reason abandoned (if study stopped)

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

Elective patients:
1. Age 65 years or older
2. Symptomatic and sonographically detected cholelithiasis
3. Qualified for elective cholecystectomy (symptomatic and sonographically detected cholelithiasis without any signs of inflammation)
4. Provision of informed consent to participate

Emergency patients:
1. Age 65 years or older
2. Acute cholecystitis according to the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines
3. Qualified for emergency cholecystectomy (acute cholecystitis according to the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines operated within 24 hours after admission to the surgical department)
4. Provision of informed consent to participate

Participant type(s)

Patient

Age group

Senior

Sex

Both

Target number of participants

60 elective and emergency patients

Total final enrolment

126

Participant exclusion criteria

1. Patients with pancreatitis
2. No consent at the time of surgery

Recruitment start date

22/05/2014

Recruitment end date

15/12/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

Poland

Study participating centre

Jagiellonian University Medical College
3rd Department of General Surgery
Pradnicka str. 35-37
Kraków
31-202
Poland

Sponsor information

Organisation

3rd Department of General Surgery Jagiellonian University Medical College

Sponsor details

Pradnicka 35-37
Krakow
31-202
Poland

Sponsor type

Hospital/treatment centre

Website

ROR

https://ror.org/03bqmcz70

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Funder name

3rd Department of General Surgery Jagiellonian University Medical College

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype

Location

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Publication in a peer reviewed journal.

Intention to publish date

30/09/2016

Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan

IPD sharing plan summary

Data sharing statement to be made available at a later date

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 29/07/2016 30/11/2020 Yes No

Additional files

Editorial Notes

30/11/2020: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.