Barretts oesophagus screening trial in a case control study
ISRCTN | ISRCTN12730505 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12730505 |
Secondary identifying numbers | A091986, Ethics reference - 10/H0308/71 |
- Submission date
- 16/06/2011
- Registration date
- 05/08/2011
- Last edited
- 18/04/2017
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English Summary
Contact information
Dr Rebecca Fitzgerald
Scientific
Scientific
Box 197 Hutchison / MRC Research Centre
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0XZ
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)122 376 3287 |
---|---|
rcf29@hutchison-mrc.cam.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Case control study |
---|---|
Primary study design | Observational |
Secondary study design | Case-control study |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Diagnostic |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | Evaluation of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge) for Barretts oEsophagus Screening Trial in a case control study: BEST 2 |
Study acronym | BEST 2 |
Study hypothesis | The purpose of the study is to obtain more accurate data on the potential of the Cytosponge as a screening modality (in conjunction with trifoil factor (TFF3) for Barrett's oesophagus (BE), and to find out its potential to determine the risk of cancer progression (in conjunction with biomarkers of risk). The primary objectives of the study are: 1. Performance and safety characteristics of the Cytosponge test 2. Effectiveness of the Cytosponge for diagnosing BE compared with endoscopy, including specificity (from controls) and sensitivity (from cases). 3. For patients with BE, the ability of Cytosponge biomarkers to risk stratify patients, according to their future cancer risk, in comparison with the dysplasia grade obtained from endoscopic biopsies. |
Ethics approval(s) | National Research Ethics Services Cambridgeshire Research Ethics Committee, 25/10/2010, ref: 10/H0308/71 |
Condition | Barrett's oesophagus |
Intervention | 500-700 cases and 500-700 controls [a range is given because this will vary slightly depending on the prevalence of dysplastic cases in order to give us 100 cases of low grade dysplasia (LGD) and 100 high grade dysplasia (HGD)]. Any patient clinically fit for an endoscopy with Barretts oesophagus (for the cases) and (or) with upper GI symptoms of reflux or dyspepsia as an indication for endoscopy. Individuals must be able to provide informed consent. A case control study design in which the cases will be patients with known Barretts oesophagus (BE) and controls individuals with reflux or indigestion (dyspepsia) symptoms referred for endoscopy. Four centres with expertise in Barretts oesophagus will recruit patients. All participants will swallow the Cytosponge device prior to having an endoscopy. The Cytosponge will be processed for a number of different biomarkers. The results will be compared with the endoscopy findings. Statistical methods for proportions including estimation of proportions with confidence intervals and testing for difference between two proportions and trends in proportions. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | 1. Performance and safety characteristics of the Cytosponge test 2. Effectiveness of the Cytosponge for diagnosing BE compared with endoscopy, including specificity (from controls) and sensitivity (from cases) 2. For patients with BE, the ability of Cytosponge biomarkers to risk stratify patients in comparison with dysplasia grade obtained from endoscopic biopsies |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Differential sensitivity of screening BE with dysplasia (low and high grade) compared to non-dysplastic BE 2. Determine the reproducibility of the Cytosponge result by repeated testing in a subset of individuals 3. Logistics of high-throughput sample processing and automated analysis of Cytosponge specimens for use in routine National Health Services (NHS) or other health care settings. |
Overall study start date | 07/07/2011 |
Overall study end date | 31/12/2016 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 1000-1400 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Any participant 18 years and above clinically fit for an endoscopy with Barretts oesophagus (Cases) with or without upper gastrintestinal (GI) symptoms 2. Any participant 18 years and above clinically fit for an endoscopy with upper GI symptoms of reflux or dyspepsia as an indication for endoscopy / gastroscopy (Controls) 3. Ability to provide informed consent 4. Patients who have undergone endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for high grade dysplasia and due for repeat endoscopy |
Participant exclusion criteria | 1. Individuals with a diagnosis of an oro-pharynx, oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal tumour, or symptoms of dysphagia 2. Oesophageal varices, stricture or requiring dilatation of the oesophagus 3. On anticoagulation therapy / medication (warfarin, clopridogrel, heparin or tinzaparin) 4. Individuals who have had a myocardial infarction or any cardiac event less than six months ago 5. Individuals who have had a cerebrovascular event < 6 months ago where their swallowing has been affected 6. Patients who have had previous treatment such as photodynamic therapy (PDT) or radio frequency ablation (RFA) 7. Participants who are unable to provide informed consent 8. Participants under age 18 9. Participants who exclude beef from their diet as the gelatine is beef based. This can be discussed with the patient 10. Endoscopy is generally avoided in pregnant women and therefore it is unlikely that any pregnant women will be included although pregnancy would not be an absolute contraindication. Pregnancy / pregnancy test will not be recorded as part of the trial |
Recruitment start date | 07/07/2011 |
Recruitment end date | 31/12/2016 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Hutchison/MRC Research Centre
Cambridge
CB2 0XZ
United Kingdom
CB2 0XZ
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre
Hospital/treatment centre
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
England
United Kingdom
https://ror.org/04v54gj93 |
Funders
Funder type
Charity
Cancer Research UK (CRUK) (UK)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
- Alternative name(s)
- CR_UK, Cancer Research UK - London, CRUK
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/01/2017 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
18/04/2017: Publication reference added.
08/02/2016: The overall trial end date was changed from 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2016.