Barrett’s oesophagus screening trial in a case control study

ISRCTN ISRCTN12730505
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12730505
Secondary identifying numbers A091986, Ethics reference - 10/H0308/71
Submission date
16/06/2011
Registration date
05/08/2011
Last edited
18/04/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

http://cancerhelp.cancerresearchuk.org/trials/a-study-to-see-how-well-a-new-way-screening-for-barretts-oesophagus-works-best2

Contact information

Dr Rebecca Fitzgerald
Scientific

Box 197 Hutchison / MRC Research Centre
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0XZ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)122 376 3287
Email rcf29@hutchison-mrc.cam.ac.uk

Study information

Study designCase control study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCase-control study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleEvaluation of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge) for Barrett’s oEsophagus Screening Trial in a case control study: BEST 2
Study acronymBEST 2
Study hypothesisThe purpose of the study is to obtain more accurate data on the potential of the Cytosponge as a screening modality (in conjunction with trifoil factor (TFF3) for Barrett's oesophagus (BE), and to find out its potential to determine the risk of cancer progression (in conjunction with biomarkers of risk).

The primary objectives of the study are:
1. Performance and safety characteristics of the Cytosponge test
2. Effectiveness of the Cytosponge for diagnosing BE compared with endoscopy, including specificity (from controls) and sensitivity (from cases).
3. For patients with BE, the ability of Cytosponge biomarkers to risk stratify patients, according to their future cancer risk, in comparison with the dysplasia grade obtained from endoscopic biopsies.
Ethics approval(s)National Research Ethics Services Cambridgeshire Research Ethics Committee, 25/10/2010, ref: 10/H0308/71
ConditionBarrett's oesophagus
Intervention500-700 cases and 500-700 controls [a range is given because this will vary slightly depending on the prevalence of dysplastic cases in order to give us 100 cases of low grade dysplasia (LGD) and 100 high grade dysplasia (HGD)]. Any patient clinically fit for an endoscopy with Barrett’s oesophagus (for the cases) and (or) with upper GI symptoms of reflux or dyspepsia as an indication for endoscopy. Individuals must be able to provide informed consent.

A case control study design in which the cases will be patients with known Barrett’s oesophagus (BE) and controls individuals with reflux or indigestion (dyspepsia) symptoms referred for endoscopy. Four centres with expertise in Barrett’s oesophagus will recruit patients. All participants will swallow the Cytosponge device prior to having an endoscopy. The Cytosponge will be processed for a number of different biomarkers. The results will be compared with the endoscopy findings.

Statistical methods for proportions including estimation of proportions with confidence intervals and testing for difference between two proportions and trends in proportions.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Performance and safety characteristics of the Cytosponge test
2. Effectiveness of the Cytosponge for diagnosing BE compared with endoscopy, including specificity (from controls) and sensitivity (from cases)
2. For patients with BE, the ability of Cytosponge biomarkers to risk stratify patients in comparison with dysplasia grade obtained from endoscopic biopsies
Secondary outcome measures1. Differential sensitivity of screening BE with dysplasia (low and high grade) compared to non-dysplastic BE
2. Determine the reproducibility of the Cytosponge result by repeated testing in a subset of individuals
3. Logistics of high-throughput sample processing and automated analysis of Cytosponge specimens for use in routine National Health Services (NHS) or other health care settings.
Overall study start date07/07/2011
Overall study end date31/12/2016

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants1000-1400
Participant inclusion criteria1. Any participant 18 years and above clinically fit for an endoscopy with Barrett’s oesophagus (Cases) with or without upper gastrintestinal (GI) symptoms
2. Any participant 18 years and above clinically fit for an endoscopy with upper GI symptoms of reflux or dyspepsia as an indication for endoscopy / gastroscopy (Controls)
3. Ability to provide informed consent
4. Patients who have undergone endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for high grade dysplasia and due for repeat endoscopy
Participant exclusion criteria1. Individuals with a diagnosis of an oro-pharynx, oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal tumour, or symptoms of dysphagia
2. Oesophageal varices, stricture or requiring dilatation of the oesophagus
3. On anticoagulation therapy / medication (warfarin, clopridogrel, heparin or tinzaparin)
4. Individuals who have had a myocardial infarction or any cardiac event less than six months ago
5. Individuals who have had a cerebrovascular event < 6 months ago where their swallowing has been affected
6. Patients who have had previous treatment such as photodynamic therapy (PDT) or radio frequency ablation (RFA)
7. Participants who are unable to provide informed consent
8. Participants under age 18
9. Participants who exclude beef from their diet as the gelatine is beef based. This can be discussed with the patient
10. Endoscopy is generally avoided in pregnant women and therefore it is unlikely that any pregnant women will be included although pregnancy would not be an absolute contraindication. Pregnancy / pregnancy test will not be recorded as part of the trial
Recruitment start date07/07/2011
Recruitment end date31/12/2016

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Hutchison/MRC Research Centre
Cambridge
CB2 0XZ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04v54gj93

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) (UK)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
CR_UK, Cancer Research UK - London, CRUK
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2017 Yes No

Editorial Notes

18/04/2017: Publication reference added.
08/02/2016: The overall trial end date was changed from 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2016.