Biomarker evaluation of different types of Internet-based interactive computer-tailored nutrition education on fat consumption
ISRCTN | ISRCTN01557410 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN01557410 |
Secondary identifying numbers | NTR623 |
- Submission date
- 04/04/2006
- Registration date
- 04/04/2006
- Last edited
- 06/01/2021
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English Summary
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Willemieke Kroeze
Scientific
Scientific
Erasmus Medical Center
Department of Public Health
Room AE 139
P.O. Box 2040
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands
Phone | +31 (0)10 4089253 |
---|---|
w.kroeze@erasmusmc.nl |
Study information
Study design | Randomised, single blind, active controlled, parallel group trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Not specified |
Study type | Prevention |
Scientific title | Biomarker evaluation of different types of Internet-based interactive computer-tailored nutrition education on fat consumption |
Study hypothesis | Computer-tailored health education has been found to be a promising intervention technique to improve a variety of health related behaviours, such as physical activity and dietary behaviours. To be able to improve efficacy, efficiency and applicability of computer-tailored interventions, more in-depth investigations are needed into the most effective delivery forms (print versus interactive), the feedback elements that contribute to efficacy, and whether intervention effects can also be demonstrated using biomarkers as an outcome measure. The aim of the present study was three-fold: 1. To investigate whether provision of interactive computer-tailored information versus in print format differ in efficacy 2. To identify the minimally required feedback elements of a computer-tailored intervention 3. To evaluate the intervention effects using biomarkers as an outcome measure in addition to self-reported behaviour These research questions were studied in relation to a computer-tailored intervention aimed at fat intake. Fat intake is an important behavioural risk factor and computer-tailored interventions have been found most effective in reducing fat intake. The study was conducted among healthy adults recruited from nine companies and two communities in the area of Rotterdam. |
Ethics approval(s) | Ethics approval received from the local medical ethics committee |
Condition | No condition, healthy person |
Intervention | The study contains four experimental conditions and one control group: 1. Computer-tailored personal feedback on fat consumption in print form 2. Computer-tailored personal and normative feedback on fat consumption in print form 3. Computer-tailored personal, normative and action feedback on fat consumption in print form 4. Computer-tailored personal, normative and action feedback on fat consumption in web-based form (CD-ROM) 5. Generic information on fat consumption in print form (control group) All the intervention materials were provided once. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | 1. Total fat and saturated fat consumption - measured with a validated food frequency questionnaire developed by Wageningen University 2. Blood lipids (total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein [HDL], low density lipoprotein [LDL], triglycerides) - sampling and analysing conducted by a certified laboratory (Star Rotterdam) |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Intention to change 2. Process measures |
Overall study start date | 24/03/2003 |
Overall study end date | 21/04/2005 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 841 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Age 18 - 65 years 2. No prescribed diet from dietician or physician 3. No treatment for hyper-cholesterolaemia 4. Sufficient understanding of the Dutch language |
Participant exclusion criteria | Does not comply with the above inclusion criteria |
Recruitment start date | 24/03/2003 |
Recruitment end date | 21/04/2005 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Netherlands
Study participating centre
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands
3000 CA
Netherlands
Sponsor information
Erasmus University Medical Center
Hospital/treatment centre
Hospital/treatment centre
Department of Public Health
PO Box 2040
Rotterdam
3000 CA
Netherlands
Website | http://www.erasmusmc.nl/ |
---|---|
https://ror.org/018906e22 |
Funders
Funder type
Research organisation
ZonMw
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
- Alternative name(s)
- Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Location
- Netherlands
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 29/04/2008 | 06/01/2021 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
06/01/2021: Publication reference added.